Colorado Bill Restricts AI Use in Psychotherapy
Summary
Colorado's HB26-1195 proposes to prohibit licensed professionals from using AI for direct therapeutic communication, generating treatment plans without review, or detecting emotions. The bill allows administrative AI use with professional oversight and requires informed consent for recording sessions. It aims to regulate AI's role in psychotherapy services within the state.
What changed
Colorado Bill HB26-1195, introduced for the 2026 Regular Session, seeks to impose significant restrictions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in psychotherapy services. The bill specifically prohibits licensed psychologists, counselors, social workers, therapists, and other regulated professionals from using AI for direct client interaction in therapeutic communication, generating treatment plans without professional review and approval, or for detecting client emotions or mental states. While allowing AI for administrative or supplementary support under the direct responsibility of the regulated professional, it mandates written informed consent if AI is used for recording or transcribing sessions.
The practical implications for healthcare providers in Colorado are substantial. Regulated professionals must immediately cease using AI for direct client interaction or emotion detection in therapy. Any AI-assisted treatment planning requires rigorous professional oversight and approval. Furthermore, a new compliance requirement for obtaining written informed consent for session recording via AI is introduced. The bill also clarifies that AI use in accredited educational programs, research under IRB oversight, or for non-diagnostic wellness tools is permissible under specific conditions. Violations could lead to disciplinary action by the applicable regulatory board, impacting professional licenses and potentially leading to entity-level penalties.
What to do next
- Review and update psychotherapy service protocols to prohibit direct AI client interaction and emotion detection.
- Implement a process for professional review and approval of all AI-generated treatment plans.
- Obtain written, informed client consent for any AI-assisted session recording or transcription.
Penalties
Applicable board may take disciplinary action against regulated professionals for violations.
Source document (simplified)
HB26-1195
Psychotherapy Artificial Intelligence Restrictions
| Type | Bill |
| --- | --- |
| Session | 2026 Regular Session |
| Subjects | Business & Economic Development Professions & Occupations |
Concerning restrictions on the use of artificial intelligence relating to psychotherapy services.
Recent Bill (PDF) Recent Fiscal Note (PDF) Bill Summary:
The bill prohibits licensed, certified, or registered psychologists, professional counselors, social workers, clinical social workers, marriage and family therapists, addiction counselors, or candidates for those credentials, as well as unlicensed psychotherapists and other individuals lawfully permitted to provide psychotherapy services in the state (regulated professionals), from using an artificial intelligence system to:
- Directly interact with clients in any form of therapeutic communication;
- Generate therapeutic recommendations or treatment plans without review and approval by regulated professionals; or
- Detect emotions or mental states. Under current law, the practice of "psychotherapy" or "psychotherapy services" means, in pertinent part: Treatment, diagnosis, testing, assessment, or counseling in a professional relationship to assist individuals or groups to alleviate behavioral and mental health disorders; understand unconscious or conscious motivation; resolve emotional, relationship, or attitudinal conflicts; or modify behaviors that interfere with effective emotional, social, or intellectual functioning. Psychotherapy follows a planned procedure of intervention that takes place on a regular basis or over a period of time, or, in the cases of testing, assessment, and brief psychotherapy, psychotherapy can be a single intervention. The definition of psychotherapy in current law also states that it is the intent of the general assembly that the definition of psychotherapy be interpreted in its narrowest sense to regulate only those persons that clearly fall within the definition.
The bill allows regulated professionals to use an artificial intelligence system to assist in providing administrative support or supplementary support for psychotherapy services if the regulated professional maintains full responsibility for all interactions, outputs, and data use associated with the artificial intelligence system.
Further, if a client's therapeutic session will be recorded or transcribed through the use of an artificial intelligence system, the regulated professional must obtain written, informed consent from the client or the client's representative.
The bill does not prohibit the use of an artificial intelligence system within accredited or approved educational, instructional, or professional training programs so long as the artificial intelligence system is used solely for educational, administrative, simulation, or training purposes and is not deployed or marketed for use with clients, patients, or the public.
The bill also does not prohibit the development or testing of an artificial intelligence system solely for research purposes under the oversight of a federally registered institutional review board, so long as the artificial intelligence system is not offered to consumers or used to provide psychotherapy services outside of the research setting.
Further, the bill also does not prohibit the use of a technology or service that provides self-help, coaching, guided meditation, or wellness tools and that does not diagnose or treat mental health disorders and clearly discloses that the technology or service is not a substitute for clinical care.
The applicable board that regulates a regulated professional may take disciplinary action against a regulated professional that violates prohibitions in the bill concerning the use of artificial intelligence systems relating to psychotherapy services.
The bill also makes it unlawful for an individual, corporation, or entity (person) to provide, advertise, or otherwise offer psychotherapy services to the public in the state unless the services are provided by a regulated professional.
It is an unfair trade practice under the "Colorado Consumer Protection Act" for a person to use a term, letter, or phrase in the advertising, interface, or outputs of an artificial intelligence system that indicates or implies that the artificial intelligence system's output data is endorsed by or equivalent to psychotherapy services provided by regulated professionals or represent that the artificial intelligence system provides psychotherapy services or that users' data or information is confidential.
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Prime Sponsors
Gretchen Rydin
Representative
Javier Mabrey
Senator
Judy Amabile
Senator
Kyle Mullica
Committees
House
Share:
If you require reasonable accessibility accommodation to access this content, please email accessibility@coleg.gov.
Status
Under Consideration
Introduced
Under Consideration
Related Documents & Information
| Date | Version | Documents |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 02/11/2026 | Introduced | PDF |
| Date | Version | Documents |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 03/05/2026 | PA1 | PDF |
| Date | Version | Documents |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 03/04/2026 | First Revised Fiscal Note | PDF |
| 02/23/2026 | Initial Fiscal Note | PDF |
| Activity | Vote | Documents |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Refer House Bill 26-1195, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole. | The motion passed on a vote of 13-0. | Vote summary |
Committee Report: PDF
| Date | Amendment Number | Committee/ Floor Hearing | Status | Documents |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 03/04/2026 | L.003 | HOU Health & Human Services | Passed [] | PDF |
| 03/04/2026 | L.002 | HOU Health & Human Services | Passed [] | PDF |
| 03/04/2026 | L.001 | HOU Health & Human Services | Passed [*] | PDF |
* Amendments passed in committee are not incorporated into the measure unless adopted by the full House or Senate.
** The status of Second Reading amendments may be subsequently affected by the adoption of an amendment to the Committee of the Whole Report. Refer to the House or Senate Journal for additional information.
| Date | Location | Action |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 03/25/2026 | House | House Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments |
| 03/09/2026 | House | House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments |
| 03/04/2026 | House | House Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole |
| 02/11/2026 | House | Introduced In House - Assigned to Health & Human Services |
Prime Sponsor
Rep. J. Mabrey | Rep. G. Rydin
Sen. J. Amabile | Sen. K. Mullica
Sponsor
(None) Co-Sponsor
(None)
Quick Links
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Government & Legislation alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when CO Legislature Bill Search publishes new changes.