Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Mrs V Keegan v Regal Health and Wellbeing Ltd: ...
Priority review Enforcement Amended Final

Mrs V Keegan v Regal Health and Wellbeing Ltd: Sex Discrimination and Unlawful Deduction from Wages

Favicon for www.gov.uk UK HMCTS
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The Employment Tribunal in the Manchester hearing centre issued a Reserved Judgment in Mrs V Keegan v Regal Health and Wellbeing Ltd (t/a The Massage Company), case number 3300617/2024, dated 8 February 2026. The claim was brought under the jurisdiction codes of Sex Discrimination and Unlawful Deduction from Wages under the Employment Rights Act 1998.

Why this matters

Employers should review their equal pay practices and wage deduction procedures against the Equality Act 2010 and Employment Rights Act 1998 provisions. Employment Tribunals in England and Wales have jurisdiction to award unlimited compensation for unlawful wage deductions and discrimination, including back pay, injury to feelings, and future losses.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by HMCTS on gov.uk . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The Employment Tribunal issued a Reserved Judgment in case 3300617/2024, finding in favour of the claimant on claims of Sex Discrimination and Unlawful Deduction from Wages against Regal Health and Wellbeing Ltd (trading as The Massage Company). The decision was reserved following a hearing at the Manchester hearing centre.

Employers in the retail health and wellness sector should ensure compliance with sex discrimination protections under the Equality Act 2010 and wage deduction provisions under the Employment Rights Act 1998. The reserved judgment, once formally entered, will create enforceable obligations on the respondent employer.

Archived snapshot

Apr 22, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Mrs V Keegan v Regal Health and Wellbeing Ltd (T/a The Massage Company): 3300617/2024

Employment Tribunal decision.

From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Employment Tribunal Published 22 April 2026 Country: England and Wales Jurisdiction code: Sex Discrimination and Unlawful Deduction from Wages Decision date: 8 February 2026 Read the full decision in Mrs V Keegan v Regal Health and Wellbeing Ltd (T/a The Massage Company): 3300617/2024 - Reserved Judgment.

Published 22 April 2026

Named provisions

Sex Discrimination Unlawful Deduction from Wages

Get daily alerts for UK HMCTS

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from HMCTS.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
HMCTS
Filed
February 8th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
3300617/2024
Docket
3300617/2024

Who this affects

Applies to
Employers Healthcare providers
Industry sector
6211 Healthcare Providers
Activity scope
Employment discrimination claims Wage disputes Tribunal proceedings
Geographic scope
England GB-ENG

Taxonomy

Primary area
Employment & Labor
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Civil Rights Healthcare

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when UK HMCTS publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!