Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Lead Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 26, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Kevin Duane Owens v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

• Citations: None known
• Docket Number: 11-25-00381-CR
• Nature of Suit: Evading Arrest

• Disposition: Dismissed

• Opinion

• Authorities (4)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (0)

• PDF

Disposition

Dismissed

Lead Opinion

Opinion filed March 26, 2026

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

No. 11-25-00381-CR

KEVIN DUANE OWENS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 35th District Court
Brown County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CR30642

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Kevin Duane Owens, pleaded guilty to the third-degree felony
offense of evading arrest or detention with a vehicle. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN.
§ 38.04(a), (b)(2)(A) (West Supp. 2025). Pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain
agreement between Appellant and the State, the trial court sentenced Appellant to
imprisonment in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice for eight years. Appellant filed a motion for new trial challenging the
voluntariness of his guilty plea and a motion for permission to appeal the trial court’s
judgment. Appellant also filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
The trial court’s certification shows that this is a plea bargain case and that
Appellant does not have the right of appeal. As a result, we notified Appellant that
the trial court’s certification reflected that Appellant did not have the right of appeal,
requesting Appellant’s counsel to respond and show grounds to continue the appeal
and informing him that the appeal was subject to dismissal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West
2018). Appellant’s counsel responded that the motion for new trial and the motion
for permission to appeal were set for a hearing on February 17, 2026, and he
requested that we “make no decisions” regarding the dismissal of the appeal until
after the hearing.
Following the hearing, the trial court denied Appellant’s motions and denied
his request to “reinstate [Appellant’s] right to appeal.” We again requested a
response from Appellant’s counsel, informing him that the appeal was subject to
dismissal. Appellant’s counsel has not filed a response.
Rule 25.2(a)(2) provides that, in a plea bargain case in which the punishment
imposed does not exceed the punishment agreed to by the parties, “a defendant may
appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on
before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or (C) where the
specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); see
also CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02. The trial court denied Appellant’s request for
permission to appeal, and an appeal is not authorized by statute in this circumstance;
therefore, subsections (B) and (C) are not applicable here. Further, Rule 25.2 does
not permit a plea-bargaining defendant to appeal matters related to the voluntariness
of his plea unless the defendant has obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal.
See Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Carender v. State,
155 S.W.3d 929, 931 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.).

2
The documents on file show that Appellant entered into a plea bargain
agreement, his punishment was assessed by the trial court in accordance with the
agreement, and the trial court denied his request for permission to appeal.1 Further,
the trial court certified that this is a plea bargain case and that Appellant has no right
of appeal. The documents on file in this court support the trial court’s certification.
See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613–14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly,
we must dismiss this appeal without further action. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d);
Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
This appeal is dismissed.

W. STACY TROTTER
JUSTICE

March 26, 2026
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

1
The documents on file also show that in the appeal waiver that: Appellant waived his right of
appeal, the trial court certified that the case was a plea bargain case, Appellant has no right of appeal,
Appellant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right of appeal, Appellant understood the
consequences of the waiver, and the waiver was accepted by the trial court. The waiver is signed by the
trial court and Appellant.
3