Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Ex Parte Salinas - Out of Time Appeal Granted
Priority review Enforcement Amended Final

Ex Parte Salinas - Out of Time Appeal Granted

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted Joe Salinas an out-of-time appeal after finding he was denied his right to pursue direct appeal due to a clerical error removing his appointed counsel. Salinas was convicted of failure to register as a sex offender and sentenced to eighteen years' imprisonment. The trial court must determine indigence within ten days of the mandate and appoint counsel if applicable. Salinas has thirty days from the mandate to file a notice of appeal.

Published by TX Ct. Crim. App. on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted habeas corpus relief to applicant Joe Salinas, who was convicted of failure to register as a sex offender and sentenced to 18 years imprisonment. The Court found that applicant was denied his right to pursue a direct appeal through no fault of his own when a clerical error removed his appointed appellate counsel. The Court ordered that applicant may file an out-of-time appeal and provided specific procedural timelines: the trial court must determine indigence within ten days of the mandate, and if applicant is indigent and desires representation, counsel shall be appointed. Applicant must file a written notice of appeal within thirty days of the mandate.\n\nAffected parties: Criminal defendants in Texas who may have been denied their right to appeal due to procedural or clerical errors now have precedent supporting out-of-time appeal requests. Trial courts must ensure continuous representation during critical filing periods to avoid similar habeas corpus findings.

Archived snapshot

Apr 19, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Lead Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 16, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Salinas, Joe

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Disposition

Out of Time Appeal Granted

Lead Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-97,495-01

EX PARTE JOE SALINAS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. DC-2025-CR-2477-A IN THE 140TH DISTRICT
COURT
LUBBOCK COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Applicant was convicted of failure to register as a sex offender and sentenced

to eighteen years’ imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ of habeas

corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court.

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal because a

clerical error removed his appointed appellate counsel and he was left without
2

representation during the period for filing a notice of appeal. Based on the record,

the trial court has found that Applicant was denied his right to pursue a direct

appeal through no fault of his own.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of his conviction in cause number DC-

2025-CR-2477 from the 140th District Court of Lubbock County. Within ten days

from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by

counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him on direct appeal.

Should Applicant decide to appeal, he must file a written notice of appeal in the

trial court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: April 16, 2026
Do not publish

Named provisions

Article 11.07 Habeas Corpus

Get daily alerts for Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from TX Ct. Crim. App..

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
TX Ct. Crim. App.
Filed
April 16th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
WR-97,495-01
Docket
WR-97,495-01 DC-2025-CR-2477-A

Who this affects

Applies to
Courts Criminal defendants
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Habeas corpus proceedings Criminal appeals Right to counsel
Geographic scope
Texas US-TX

Taxonomy

Primary area
Criminal Justice
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Judicial Administration Civil Rights

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Texas Court of Criminal Appeals publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!