Employee vs. Contractor Classification Payroll Tax Guide
Summary
This guide from ABA Legal News discusses the risks of misclassifying workers as 1099 contractors rather than W2 employees for payroll tax purposes. State payroll tax audits have increased in recent years, and misclassification can result in penalties, back taxes with interest, and extended audit periods. The article advises business owners on documentation practices to defend against misclassification findings, noting that audits are commonly triggered by unemployment claims, worker complaints, and cross-state agency referrals.
“Employers have lost independent contractor classification in audits because a worker lacked a simple $35 city business license.”
Businesses that engage 1099 contractors should conduct an immediate review of their documentation practices. Specifically, confirm that each contractor has a city business license—the article notes that employers have lost classification arguments over a missing $35 license. Documentation gaps are the primary vulnerability in any audit.
What changed
This informational guide summarizes the consequences of misclassifying employees as independent contractors for payroll tax purposes. The article explains that states have generally become more employee-friendly over the past decade, and that misclassification can lead to financial penalties, back taxes with interest, and expanded audit periods across multiple state agencies.
Employers should be aware that audits are frequently triggered by unemployment insurance claims, worker complaints, and whistleblowing. The guide specifically cautions against misclassifying household workers such as nannies, caregivers, and private nurses, noting that these workers have a high likelihood of being reclassified as employees if they file for unemployment benefits. To defend against misclassification findings, businesses should maintain thorough documentation including city business licenses, business insurance, incorporation documents, and EINs for their 1099 contractors.
Archived snapshot
Apr 21, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Summary
- Misclassification can lead to penalties, back taxes with interest, and expanded audit periods, depending on the type of business and recordkeeping.
- Most audits are triggered by unemployment claims, the type of profession, worker complaints and whistleblowing, and cross-state agency audits that alert other state agencies.
- Never discount things that might seem insignificant when considering how you want to document the classification of the individuals you end up hiring.
iStock.com/Darylann Elmi
Jump to:
In recent years, state payroll tax audits have begun to increase. At the federal level, the IRS also does payroll tax audits, but they are less stringent when it comes to what makes an individual a W2 versus a 1099 contractor. (Be aware that the tests that are usually used by the states are different than those used by the IRS in making an employee misclassification assessment.)
Misclassification can lead to penalties, back taxes with interest, and extended audit periods, depending on the type of business and its recordkeeping practices. Further, many state payroll tax audits can bleed into other state agencies, depending on the type of business. For instance, if you are the owner of a construction business and you consistently misclassify your workers, you could be investigated for your general contractor license, for workers’ compensation, etc. All state and federal tax agencies issue some type of financial penalty for the infraction committed by business owners.
In the last ten years, states have generally become more employee-friendly. Most audits are triggered by unemployment claims, the type of profession, worker complaints and whistleblowing, and cross-state agency audits that alert other state agencies.
Also, always be aware of individuals who are hired for work in the home, such as nannies, executive assistants, chefs, caregivers, tutors, and private nurses, just to name a few relevant professions. Many employers of these workers pay cash and do not issue 1099s, or they issue these workers 1099s not realizing that should these individuals ever file for unemployment, they have a very high chance of being categorized as employees, and thus should have been issued W2s.
As always, proactive documentation is a business owner’s best defense. When deciding whether to classify a hire as a W2 or a 1099 worker, consider their relationship to your business. A good guideline that we always give to clients is that if the individual is essential to your business, usually they will be viewed as a W2 employee. There are, of course, instances where you can have an individual who is considered essential to your business and can be a contractor. When hiring these 1099 individuals, documenting their contracts specifically tailored to their actions is essential. Further, make sure that those individuals provide evidence of their separate and independent business operations, such as city business licenses, business cards, business insurance, incorporation documents, and EIN.
Employers have lost independent contractor classification in audits because a worker lacked a simple $35 city business license. Never discount things that might seem insignificant when considering how you want to document in your business files the classification of the individuals you end up hiring. Always consult either a tax or employment attorney if you feel that you have questions related to hiring 1099 individuals for your business. Moving forward with unanswered questions or inadequate business records can and will create a bigger headache than necessary if you are ever contacted for a payroll audit.
Endnotes
Authors
Allison D. H. Soares
Allison D.H. Soares, JD, MBA San Diego (619) 618-6648 | Irvine (949) 449-1446 | San Francisco (415) 799-3031 [email protected] | www.AllisonSoares.com| www.VanstLawFirm.com...
View Bio →
Lauren Suarez
Lauren Suarez ([email protected]), of counsel with RJS Law Firm, is a SanDiego native with a passion for tax. She has worked on both the tax controversy side and the tax preparation side for businesses and individuals...
View Bio →
Authors
Allison D. H. Soares
Lauren Suarez
Related Content
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ABA Legal News
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from RJS Law.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ABA Legal News publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.