Consultation on the Prudential Treatment of Cryptoassets on Permissionless Blockchains
Summary
The Monetary Authority of Singapore has published Consultation Paper P009-2026, seeking public comments on a proposed prudential treatment framework for cryptoassets held by banks and financial institutions. The consultation covers capital adequacy, credit risk, and liquidity risk treatment for cryptoassets on permissionless blockchains. Comments will be accepted until 11:59 PM on 18 May 2026.
What changed
The Monetary Authority of Singapore has released a consultation paper proposing a prudential treatment framework for cryptoassets on permissionless blockchains. The consultation addresses how banks and financial institutions should treat cryptoassets for purposes of capital adequacy, credit risk, and liquidity risk under Singapore's regulatory framework.
Affected banks and financial institutions should review the proposed framework and prepare submissions before the 18 May 2026 comment deadline. The outcome may establish new capital and risk management requirements for crypto-related activities in Singapore's financial sector.
Archived snapshot
Apr 20, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Decrease font size Increase font size Print this page Consultations Published Date: 17 April 2026
Consultation Paper on the Prudential Treatment of Cryptoassets on Permissionless Blockchains
- Capital Adequacy
- Credit Risk
- Liquidity Risk Consultation Number: P009-2026 Start Date: 17 April 2026 Closing Date: 18 May 2026 This consultation closes at 11.59 PM on 18 May 2026. VIEW DOCUMENT Consultation Paper on the Prudential Treatment of Cryptoassets on Permissionless Blockchains (695.1 KB)
Get daily alerts for MAS Guidelines
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from MAS.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when MAS Guidelines publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.