Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Chase Browning-Langstaff v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for second-degree murder. The appellant was sentenced to six years imprisonment. The court found sufficient evidence despite the appellant's claim of self-defense.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Dedrick Brigance v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Dedrick Brigance for second-degree murder with a firearm enhancement. Brigance appealed, arguing insufficient evidence and error in jury instructions regarding the state's stand-your-ground law.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Ryan Michael Douglas v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to revoke Ryan Michael Douglas's suspended imposition of sentence. Douglas was sentenced to three years imprisonment and a suspended imposition of sentence on one case, and a four-year suspended imposition of sentence on another.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Alberto Dominguez v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for thirty counts of possession of child sexual abuse material. The court also remanded the case to correct the sentencing order. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of evidence and the denial of motions to suppress.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Fard Muhammad v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a misdemeanor conviction for third-degree battery against Fard Muhammad. The court found that Muhammad knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel, despite his limited education and self-representation.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Oberlander v. Oberlander - Appeal of Summary Judgment

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of David Oberlander and Conway Neurology, P.A., dismissing claims of tort-of-outrage and invasion of privacy. The case involved the disclosure of medical records in a child support dispute.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Madiha Shahid v. Asif Masood - Divorce Case Opinion

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part a divorce decree concerning child support, alimony, and custody. The court also affirmed the lower court's findings on contempt and joint custody.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Scott v. Arkansas Dept. Human Services - Parental Rights Termination

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of parental rights for Katlyn and Steven Scott concerning their minor child. The court found clear and convincing evidence supported the termination grounds and that it was in the child's best interest, despite the parents' arguments regarding support for the findings and potential relative placement.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Ortiz v. Bagley - Child Custody Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision denying a mother's request to change child custody. The mother argued a material change in circumstances, but the court found insufficient evidence to support her claims for increased possession time.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

April Bradley v. Arkansas Dept. Human Services - Parental Rights Termination

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order terminating April Bradley's parental rights to her son. The court granted the motion to withdraw filed by Bradley's counsel, agreeing that there were no meritorious grounds for appeal. The case originated from allegations of child endangerment and injury.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 7891–7900 of 11,374 changes

1 788 789 790 791 792 1138

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.