SEC Adopts Final Amendments for Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act

The SEC has adopted final amendments to rules and forms under the Exchange Act to implement the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act. These amendments require directors and officers of foreign private issuers with U.S. registered equity securities to disclose beneficial ownership and transactions. The rule becomes effective on March 18, 2026.

L.B. v. San Diego Unified School District - IDEA Reimbursement

The Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's decision, ruling that a student may be entitled to reimbursement for private special education expenses under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The court found that the school district's duty to offer a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) was not contingent on parents specifically requesting an 'IEP document' versus an 'IEP meeting'. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

Medical Negligence Lawsuit Dismissed Based on Statute of Repose

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a medical negligence lawsuit against the United States. The court ruled that the claim, filed 18 years after the alleged unauthorized surgery and complications at a VA hospital, was barred by Mississippi's seven-year statute of repose.

Fifth Circuit Court Opinion: Voice of the Experienced v. LeBlanc

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for rehearing en banc in the case of Voice of the Experienced vs. LeBlanc. A dissenting opinion argued the district court twice disobeyed the Prison Litigation Reform Act by failing to make preliminary injunctions permanent within 90 days.

John Rapp v. Naphcare, Inc. - Minor Settlement Approval

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington approved a minor settlement in the case of John Rapp v. Naphcare, Inc. The court reviewed stipulated orders, motions, and a settlement guardian ad litem report before entering its order.

John Rapp Estate v. Naphcare, Inc. - Settlement and Dismissal

The District Court for the Western District of Washington has issued a stipulated motion to approve a settlement and dismissal order in the case of John Rapp Estate v. Naphcare, Inc. The case involves multiple plaintiffs and defendants, including Naphcare, Inc. and Kitsap County. The court's order signifies the resolution of the legal dispute.

Leader Capital Corp v. FNEX Capital LLC - Court Order

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington issued an order in the case of Leader Capital Corp v. FNEX Capital LLC. The order addresses motions to dismiss filed by both the plaintiff and defendants concerning claims related to a sales agreement for mutual fund products.

AG Blocks SNAP Funding Cut Over Data Privacy

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell secured a court order blocking the Trump Administration from cutting off SNAP funding to states refusing to share personal data of applicants and recipients. The court found the demand for data and the proposed USDA protocol unlawful due to privacy concerns and potential misuse of sensitive information.

Fix the City Inc. v. City of Los Angeles - Legal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in Fix the City, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, ruling that a city ordinance allowing mayoral powers during a housing and homelessness emergency is not preempted by state law. The court found no conflict between the City's administrative code and the California Emergency Services Act.

Salley v. Outfront Media - Employment Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of Outfront Media, LLC, in a case brought by former employee Robert Shane Salley. Salley appealed the dismissal of claims related to unpaid commissions and meal/rest period violations.

People v. Hill - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal issued a non-precedential opinion in People v. Hill, addressing consolidated appeals from judgments of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions regarding convictions for murder, assault, and firearm possession by felons.

People v. Salomon - Modification of Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, issued a modification to its opinion in People v. Salomon. The modification corrects the judge's name in the caption of the opinion. This is a non-precedential, unpublished opinion.

People v. Montoya - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One, issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Montoya. The court affirmed the judgment, finding no arguable issues after an independent review of the record.

People v. Rios - Appeal of Order Denying Motion to Vacate Guilty Pleas

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, affirmed a trial court's order denying Saul Meza Rios's motions to set aside guilty pleas and vacate convictions. The court found the motions untimely and that Rios failed to establish prejudicial error.

People v. Mercado - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of People v. Mercado, concerning a criminal conviction for attempted murder and assault with a firearm. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case with directions. The appeal addressed jury instructions, prosecutorial misconduct, and cumulative error.

Seeley v. Urwell Diversified Holdings - Appeal of Real Estate Transaction Judgment

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in Seeley v. Urwell Diversified Holdings. The case involves competing claims related to real estate transactions where buyers fraudulently accepted loans. The appellate court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the judgment from the Superior Court of Riverside County.

Raubitschek v. County of Los Angeles - Premises Liability Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's summary judgment for the County of Los Angeles in a premises liability case. The court found the sidewalk defect was trivial and could not support liability, affirming the non-precedential opinion.

Ribstein v. Marx - Civil Harassment Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed an order granting a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) against the appellant. The case involves allegations of fraud and a subsequent petition for a CHRO.

People v. Ortega - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Two, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Ortega. The court affirmed the judgments and sentences of defendants Daniel Ortega, Alfonso Keer, and Jaime Chacon, who were convicted of murder.

People v. Stewart - Sentencing Error on Manslaughter and Attempted Murder Charges

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, vacated the sentence for Steele Stewart in case C102503. The court found that the trial court erred by aggravating Stewart's sentence based on underlying facts that were not properly proven or admitted, and has remanded the matter for resentencing.

De La Torre v. CashCall - Unconscionable Interest Rates Ruling

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's ruling that CashCall's high interest rates (96%-135%) on subprime loans were unconscionable. The court ordered restitution for class members and enjoined collection efforts on these loans.

Woodhouse v. State Bar of Cal. - Vexatious Litigant Ruling

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's finding that Benjamin Woodhouse is a vexatious litigant. The court held his complaint lacked merit and affirmed orders barring him from future self-represented suits without pre-filing approval and security. This ruling impacts Woodhouse's ability to file future lawsuits.

People v. Rogers - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of People v. Rogers. This document is a non-precedential opinion related to a specific legal case. The court has not identified any known citations or subsequent legal actions directly related to this opinion.

People v. Sierra - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Sierra. The court affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, upholding the conviction of first-degree kidnapping and murder. The appeal concerned the admission of prior uncharged misconduct evidence.

Pomona Valley Hospital Med. Center v. Kaiser Foundation - Medical Reimbursement Dispute

The California Court of Appeal reversed in part and remanded a judgment concerning a medical reimbursement dispute between Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan. The case involves approximately $66 million in asserted unreimbursed emergency medical services provided by the hospital to Kaiser members.

People v. Quijano - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of a resentencing petition filed by Maria Quijano under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found Quijano ineligible for relief as a matter of law based on her conviction for conspiracy to commit murder and first-degree murder with a special circumstance finding.

People v. Sims - Criminal Convictions Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed in part and modified a criminal judgment for Kyle Richard Sims. The court found the evidence insufficient for certain aggravating circumstances related to drug quantities but otherwise upheld the jury's verdicts. The judgment was modified regarding sentencing terms and conduct credits.

People v. Pollard - Felony Reckless Evation Appeal

The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in the case of People v. Pollard, concerning a felony reckless evasion charge. The court is reviewing whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the underlying traffic violations for the evasion charge.

Ofcom provisionally finds suicide forum in breach of Online Safety Act

Ofcom has provisionally found a provider of an online suicide forum in breach of the UK's Online Safety Act. The provider failed to conduct adequate risk assessments and implement proportionate measures to protect users from illegal content. Ofcom is considering sanctions, including potential fines or business disruption measures.

Medina Jimenez v. Tesla, Inc. - Notice of Removal

Tesla, Inc. has filed a Notice of Removal in the case Medina Jimenez v. Tesla, Inc., case number 3:26-cv-01727, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was originally filed in Alameda Superior Court and has been removed to federal court.

H.R. 4638 - BOWOW Act of 2025 Hearing Announcement

The US House Committee on the Judiciary announced a hearing for H.R. 4638, the BOWOW Act of 2025, scheduled for March 3, 2026. The bill text and committee report are available for review.

H.R. 4638 BOWOW Act of 2025 - Immigration inadmissibility for harming law enforcement animals

H.R. 4638, the BOWOW Act of 2025, was introduced in the US House of Representatives. This bill proposes to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make aliens inadmissible and deportable if convicted of harming animals used in law enforcement.

H.R. 1958 Deporting Fraudsters Act Hearing Announcement

The US House Committee on the Judiciary announced a hearing for H.R. 1958, the Deporting Fraudsters Act of 2026. The hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, March 3, 2026, and will discuss the proposed legislation.

HR 1958: Deporting Fraudsters Act of 2026

The "Deporting Fraudsters Act of 2026" (H.R. 1958) amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to make aliens convicted of defrauding the U.S. government or unlawfully receiving public benefits inadmissible and deportable. This bill was reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary and ordered to be printed.

NCCI Loss Costs Accepted with 3.8% Decrease for Workers' Compensation

The Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) has accepted the NCCI advisory loss cost filing, resulting in an average 3.8% decrease for workers' compensation insurance, effective July 1, 2026. Insurance companies writing workers' compensation in Texas must submit rate filings by June 1, 2026, using the new loss costs.

EMA CHMP Recommends 12 Medicines for Approval

The European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended 12 new medicines for approval and six for extension of therapeutic indications. This includes novel treatments for influenza, COVID-19, paediatric brain tumours, Parkinson's disease, and several biosimilar medicines.

EMA Recommends Ojemda for Paediatric Low-Grade Glioma

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended a conditional marketing authorisation for Ojemda (tovorafenib) to treat paediatric low-grade glioma in patients aged 6 months and older with specific BRAF gene alterations. This recommendation addresses an unmet medical need for a targeted therapy in this patient population.

California Officials Seize Illegal Cannabis Plants Worth $57 Million

California state officials, led by Governor Gavin Newsom, announced the seizure of over 58,000 illegal cannabis plants and approximately three tons of processed cannabis in November. The operation, conducted by the Department of Cannabis Control, targeted the illicit market and resulted in the eradication of plants and product valued at an estimated $56.5 million.

Cannabis Business Dispute and Fraud Avoidance Guidance

The California Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) has issued guidance on avoiding business disputes and fraud within the cannabis industry. The document outlines proactive measures for vetting partners, understanding contracts, and maintaining records to prevent common pitfalls.

DCC Awards $30 Million in Cannabis Research Grants

The California Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) awarded nearly $30 million in research grants to nine academic institutions for 22 projects. This funding, derived from cannabis tax revenues, supports research on economic dynamics, public health, and environmental impacts related to cannabis.

Sonoma County CEQA Cannabis Projects Public Comment

The California Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) has released draft environmental documents for three commercial cannabis projects in Sonoma County for public review and comment. These documents, prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), analyze potential environmental impacts and propose mitigation measures. The comment period is open until March 1, 2026.

California Seizes Over $1.2 Billion in Illegal Cannabis

California announced state officers have seized and destroyed over $1.2 billion in illicit cannabis products through the Unified Cannabis Enforcement Task Force (UCETF). Seizures in 2025 alone reached $609 million, an 18-fold increase since 2022, highlighting the state's efforts to combat the illegal market.

I&S LLC Stipulation, Agreement, and Order

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has entered into a Stipulation, Agreement, and Order with I&S LLC. The order addresses alleged deceptive advertising practices related to the company's subscription services. I&S LLC has agreed to specific terms to resolve these allegations.

Dutch Botanicals LLC Stipulation Agreement Order

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a Stipulation Agreement Order against Dutch Botanicals LLC. This order likely addresses violations related to the manufacturing or marketing of food products, requiring specific actions and potentially imposing penalties.

Galactic Meds LLC Stipulation, Agreement, and Order

The US Department of Justice has entered into a Stipulation, Agreement, and Order with Galactic Meds LLC. This agreement resolves alleged violations related to the False Claims Act, requiring Galactic Meds LLC to pay a settlement amount and implement compliance measures.

Grateful Grove LLC Stipulation Agreement Order

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Stipulation Agreement Order against Grateful Grove LLC for deceptive advertising practices related to its "Get Sleep" product. The order prohibits the company from making unsubstantiated claims about the product's efficacy and requires specific disclosures.

PURA Final Decision in Yankee Gas Case

The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) has issued its final decision in the Yankee Gas case. This decision impacts energy companies operating within the state and establishes regulatory parameters for utility operations.

PURA Press Releases: Water Rate Case, Electric Rate Adjustments

The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) has issued several press releases detailing 2024 activities. Key announcements include electric rate adjustments effective July 1, 2024, and approval of CT Water's rate case with enhanced customer policies. Other releases cover newsletters, annual reports, and program incentive updates.

PURA Holds Public Comment Hearings on CNG/SNG Rate Application

The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) will hold public comment hearings to gather ratepayer feedback on an application by Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation and The Southern Connecticut Gas Company to amend their existing rate schedules. These hearings are part of the regulatory process for reviewing proposed changes to utility rates.

PURA Approves Low-Income Electric Discount Rate

The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) has approved a final decision establishing a low-income discount rate for qualifying residential electric customers. This decision, made in Docket No. 17-12-03RE11, aims to provide financial relief to eligible households.