Darren Clark v. State of Mississippi - Criminal Appeal

The Mississippi Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Darren Clark for armed robbery. The court ruled that the indictment was not legally defective for failing to name the specific store employee robbed, as it named the establishment and alleged the robbery occurred from its staff. Hinds County was taxed with the costs of the appeal.

James Carroll v. State of Mississippi - Criminal Appeal

The Court of Appeals of Mississippi affirmed the conviction of James Carroll for two counts of child exploitation. The court denied his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, upholding the consecutive forty-year sentences.

HHS OIG: Colorado Medicaid Improper Payments for ABA Services

The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) found that Colorado made at least $77.8 million in improper fee-for-service Medicaid payments for Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) services provided to children in 2022 and 2023. The OIG recommended Colorado refund $42.6 million to the Federal Government and improve guidance for ABA providers.

People of Michigan v. Robbie Deshawn Taylor - Affirmation of Lower Court Judgment

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in the case of People of Michigan v. Robbie Deshawn Taylor. The defendant was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder and two counts of assault with intent to commit murder following a second trial. This decision comes after the appellate court denied the defendant's initial application and was ordered by the Supreme Court to consider the appeal of the order denying his motion for relief from judgment.

Caleb Mitchell Brown v. Comstock Turf Inc - Opinion Vacated and Remanded

The Michigan Court of Appeals vacated a trial court judgment of $9,512,590.35 against Comstock Turf Inc. and remanded the case with an order to enter judgment in favor of the defendants. The court's decision means the original judgment is no longer valid.

Thomas King v McLaren Health Corporation - Case Vacated and Remanded

The Michigan Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the case of Thomas King v. McLaren Health Corporation. This action follows a Supreme Court order for reconsideration in light of a new precedent, potentially impacting the application of employment contract limitations periods.

People of Michigan v. Vertese Steven Woods - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment and sentence for Vertese Steven Woods, who was convicted of multiple felonies including involuntary manslaughter and fleeing and eluding. The court found the sentence, which included an upward departure from guidelines, to be proportionate.

Commonwealth v. Owen R. Broadhurst - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Commonwealth v. Owen R. Broadhurst. The case involves an appeal of 2018 convictions for OUI and negligent operation, with subsequent actions related to a prior OUI case affected by Commonwealth v. Hallinan.

Commonwealth v. Shannon Bennett - Criminal Threat Case

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion in Commonwealth v. Shannon Bennett, concerning a conviction for threatening to commit a crime. The court acknowledged an instructional error regarding First Amendment rights, requiring a vacatur of the conviction.

Sullivan v. Flanagan - Opinion Affirming Protective Order

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to grant an Interpersonal Protective Order (IPO) against Dawn Sullivan based on stalking allegations. The opinion was issued on February 27, 2026, under docket number 2025-CA-1247.

State v. Wilkins - Idaho Court of Appeals Opinion

The Idaho Court of Appeals vacated a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm against Robert Emanuel Wilkins, Jr. The court found that the impoundment and inventory search of the vehicle, which led to the discovery of the firearm, were unlawful.

Dimanione Lovelace v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Dimanione Lovelace for felony murder and conspiracy to commit robbery. The court found no error in the trial court's decisions regarding venue, sufficiency of evidence for a firearm enhancement, sentencing discretion, or the appropriateness of the sentence.

Ryan Matthew Gluys v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed and remanded Ryan Matthew Gluys's conviction for invasion of privacy. The court found that while Gluys was properly removed from a pretrial diversion program, his conviction was based on the wrong statutory interpretation of harassment under a protective order.

Rodregus Morgan v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the conviction of Rodregus Morgan for murder. The court found that the trial court erred in limiting the testimony presented regarding prior threats and abuse, which may have impacted the jury's verdict. The case will be reconsidered.

Stokes v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Isaiah Jerone Stokes in docket number 25A-CR-00531. The court's disposition indicates no changes to the lower court's ruling.

Krista B Gue v. Triple E Property Management, LLC - Legal Opinion

The Indiana Court of Appeals issued a legal opinion in Krista B. Gue v. Triple E Property Management, LLC. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case concerning vicarious liability for an employee's actions and claims of negligent hiring, retention, and supervision.

State v. Deangelo - Intermediate Court of Appeals Opinion

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued a memorandum opinion in State v. Deangelo, concerning a conviction for Murder in the Second Degree and Arson in the First Degree. The court vacated the conviction and remanded the case.

State v. Kauhola - Appeal Dismissal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals has approved a stipulation to dismiss the appeal in State v. Kauhola. The dismissal is with prejudice, as per the parties' agreement and compliance with Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Narvaez v. Rojas - Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Opinion

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Narvaez v. Rojas, addressing an award of attorney's fees. The court affirmed the district court's judgment regarding attorney's fees, totaling $26,570.19, after a prior order was vacated.

Walley Isle Motors v. La Costa - Appeal of Service Dispute

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals vacated a lower court's judgment in a dispute between Walley Isle Motors and P. Denise La Costa. The court remanded the case for entry of an amended judgment, indicating a modification of the original ruling.

Quinton Earl Settles v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Quinton Earl Settles for first-degree domestic battery. The court also addressed his appeal concerning charges of witness tampering and violation of a no-contact order, ultimately affirming his conviction.

Ronnie Tucker v. State of Arkansas - Drug Court Termination Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of Ronnie Tucker's participation in the Saline County Drug Court program. Tucker appealed the decision, arguing improper revocation and the judge's failure to recuse. The court found no error in the termination.

Weatherly v. Arkansas Dept. Human Services - Parental Rights Termination

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of parental rights for Christopher and Destiny Weatherly. The court granted the motions to withdraw filed by the parents' counsel, finding no issues of arguable merit on appeal.

Christopher Cole v. State of Arkansas - Probation Revocation Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals reviewed a probation revocation case involving Christopher Cole. The court affirmed in part and reversed and dismissed in part the lower court's decision to revoke Cole's probation and sentence him to three years imprisonment.

Dylan Hise v. Arkansas Dept. Human Services - Termination of Parental Rights

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of Dylan Hise's parental rights to his minor child. The court found sufficient statutory grounds and that termination was in the child's best interest, upholding the lower court's decision.

In Re: Mh - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in the case In Re: Mh 2024-008892. The court found the appeal moot, meaning the issue was no longer a live controversy. This is a non-precedential opinion.

Arizona Court of Appeals - Parental Rights Termination

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed an order terminating parental rights for H.K. The decision, filed on February 25, 2026, addresses the father's appeal of the juvenile court's order. The case involved issues of drug use, non-compliance with court orders, and child support.

State v. Coker - Arizona Court of Appeals Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a lower court's order forfeiting a $10,000 appearance bond for Kristi Ann Coker. The court found that Coker's attorney in the criminal case did not represent her in the civil bond forfeiture matter, and she did not attend the hearing.

Total Renal v. Hon Moskowitz/Brackman - Special Action Review

The Arizona Court of Appeals accepted special action jurisdiction and granted relief in the case of Total Renal Care, Inc. v. Hon Moskowitz/Brackman. The court reconsidered a prior decision regarding the duty owed by medical providers to non-patient third parties when their patients cause harm after leaving the facility.

Arizona Court of Appeals Parental Rights Decision

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to terminate parental rights due to chronic substance abuse. The father appealed, alleging due process violations related to a suppressed police report and a missed adjudication hearing, but the court found no merit in his claims.

Milton W. Taylor v. Director, Douglas Bellile - Appeal Opinion

The Wisconsin Courts have released an opinion for case 2024AP000709, Milton W. Taylor v. Director, Douglas Bellile. The opinion is dated February 27, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

State v. Jonathan Glen Berbaum - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Courts have released an opinion in the criminal appeal case of State v. Jonathan Glen Berbaum, with case number 2025AP001380-CR. The opinion was released on February 25, 2026.

State v. L. J. H. - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the criminal case State v. L. J. H. (Case number 2025AP002511-CR). The opinion is available in PDF format and is subject to further editing before appearing in official bound volumes.

Grant County Department of Social Services v. D. G. N. - Family Law

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the case of Grant County Department of Social Services v. D. G. N. The case number is 2025AP002382. The opinion was released on February 27, 2026.

Brittany Bay Club Condominium Owners Association, Inc. v. James R. Traugott

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals released an opinion in the case of Brittany Bay Club Condominium Owners Association, Inc. v. James R. Traugott. The opinion, identified by docket number 2025AP000100, was released on February 27, 2026. This release makes the court's decision publicly available.

Gracious Dining LLC v. Lopez - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed a decision by the Workers' Compensation Board of Review. The court found no substantial question of law or prejudicial error in the Board's reversal of a claim administrator's order that had rejected Miriam Lopez's workers' compensation claim against Gracious Dining LLC.

Cynthia Griffith v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. - Fatal Dependent Benefits

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed a prior order rejecting a claim for fatal dependent benefits filed by Cynthia Griffith, dependent spouse of deceased worker James Griffith. The court found no substantial question of law or prejudicial error in the Workers' Compensation Board of Review's decision.

City of Wheeling v. Cody Melsop - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed a decision reversing the denial of a firefighter's claim for a right knee medial meniscal tear and temporary total disability benefits. The court found no substantial question of law or prejudicial error in the Workers' Compensation Board of Review's order.

WV DMV v. Perez - Chemical Test Refusal Appeal Dismissal

The West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals dismissed the DMV's appeal of a lower court's decision to dismiss the DMV's appeal of a magistrate court's ruling on a chemical test refusal. The court found the DMV lacked statutory authority to appeal such matters.

Airgas v. Lowe - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed a Workers' Compensation Board of Review order that reversed a claim administrator's denial of benefits for Joshua Lowe. Airgas Mid America, the employer, appealed the decision. The court found no substantial question of law or prejudicial error.

Great-Grandmother's Parental Rights Termination Appeal Affirmed

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a great-grandmother's petition to terminate a mother's parental rights. The appellate court found that while grounds for termination existed, it was not in the child's best interest.

Emerson v. Emerson - Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an interlocutory appeal in the case of Emerson v. Emerson due to the appellant's untimely filing. The appeal sought to challenge a trial court's order denying a motion for recusal. The court found it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because the appeal was filed after the deadline stipulated by Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B.

Capps v. OneCare Dental Solutions LLC - Fiduciary Duty Breach

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment against Deborah McGilton for breaching her fiduciary duty as a member of OneCare Dental Solutions LLC. McGilton unilaterally sold company assets for $70,000 while securing personal employment, despite previous valuations suggesting a much higher worth. The court found the trial court properly adopted the Special Master's findings.

Urquia v. Neal - Dissenting Opinion on UM Statute Application

A dissenting opinion in the Urquia v. Neal case argues against the trial court's interpretation of Tennessee's uninsured motorist (UM) statute. The dissent contends that the statute's plain language, specifically section (d), should have been applied based on the process server's notation of 'NOT TO BE FOUND AFTER DILIGENT SEARCH AND INQUIRY,' rather than requiring further action or reissuance of summons.

Court of Appeals Dismisses Recusal Motion Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal concerning a motion to recuse a trial judge in the case of Isaiah M. The court found that issues related to the recusal denial could be raised in the appeal of the final judgment, rendering the immediate appeal unnecessary.

Sean William Lee v. State of Tennessee - Post-Conviction Relief Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Sean William Lee's petition for post-conviction relief. Lee argued his guilty plea was involuntary due to misinformation about supervision, but the court found the issue was not properly raised in the lower court.

State v. Albert Dejuan White - Concurring Opinion on Miranda Rights

A concurring opinion in State v. Albert Dejuan White argues that law enforcement violated the defendant's Miranda rights during questioning. The opinion contends that specific actions by officers constituted interrogation without proper warnings, potentially impacting the admissibility of statements.

Albert Dejuan White appeal drug and firearm convictions

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the drug and firearm convictions of Albert Dejuan White. White appealed, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and statements obtained during a search of his residence, and that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. The appellate court found no reversible error.

Jerome Barrett appeal denied, post-conviction petition reopened

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals denied Jerome Barrett's application for permission to appeal the denial of his post-conviction petition. The court found that while Barrett cited a new Supreme Court ruling on the Confrontation Clause, his claims were previously determined or not factually supported.

State v. Mario Reed - Evading Arrest and Tampering Convictions Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals reviewed the convictions of Mario Reed for evading arrest, attempted tampering with evidence, and reckless endangerment. The court affirmed the trial court's judgments on most counts but remanded for sentencing on the reckless endangerment conviction.