Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Alvin R. Bradley, Sr. - Writ Denial

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ application in the case of Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Alvin R. Bradley, Sr. The court's decision, dated March 9, 2026, does not specify the nature of the writ or the underlying dispute.

State of Louisiana v. Rocshey D. Carmel - Criminal Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied a writ application from Rocshey D. Carmel, stating the applicant failed to demonstrate seeking relief in the district court first or show extraordinary circumstances justifying bypassing the lower court. The court noted the application appeared to be a motion to remove appointed counsel filed directly with the appellate court.

State of Louisiana v. Elvis Graham - Criminal Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ filed by Elvis Graham. The court found the matter moot as the district court had already denied the relator's motion to enforce an order on October 10, 2025. The opinion was issued on March 9, 2026.

Louisiana v. Roosevelt D. Jones - Court Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ application filed by Roosevelt D. Jones in case number 2025 KW 1319. The court's decision upholds the lower court's ruling, with no specific details on the underlying case provided in this opinion.

Anh Lien LLC v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company - Court Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied supervisory writs in the case of Anh Lien, LLC and Henry Nguyen v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company. The court's decision pertains to a matter filed in the 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany.

Kendal Bellard v. Henry A. Hollier - Louisiana Court of Appeal Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed a lower court's decision, ruling that a delivery driver's employment contract is exempt from arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. The court found that the driver, as a transportation worker involved in interstate commerce, falls under the Act's exemption.

Municipal Police Retirement System v. Paris C. Sumrall - Writ Denial

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ application in the case of Municipal Police Retirement System v. Paris C. Sumrall. The court's decision, dated March 9, 2026, relates to a matter concerning the Village of Varnado and its officials.

Stenhouse v. Louisiana Women's Healthcare Associates, L.L.C. - Writ Denial

The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied a writ application in the case of Dr. James Stenhouse v. Louisiana Women's Healthcare Associates, L.L.C., et al. The court found that the criteria for granting the writ were not met, referencing the standard set in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc.

Louisiana v. James Jerrod Spikes - Court Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued a court opinion denying supervisory writs in the case of State of Louisiana v. James Jerrod Spikes. The docket number for this case is 2025 KW 1201.

BAC Home Loans Servicing v. Stockstill - TILA and FDCPA Claims

The Louisiana Court of Appeal granted a writ in BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. Stockstill, reversing the trial court's denial of a motion for summary judgment. The appellate court found that the Stockstills' claims under the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA) were time-barred.

Claybourn v. Finley - Louisiana Court of Appeal Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued an opinion in Claybourn v. Finley, docket number 2025 CW 1287. The court considered a writ application from Maria Finley and Maria A. Finley, Attorney at Law, LLC. The application was not considered due to the relator failing to include a copy of the petition.

H.T.H. v. B.B.W. - New Jersey Superior Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a final restraining order and an award of attorney's fees in the case of H.T.H. v. B.B.W. The court found sufficient evidence to support the predicate act of assault and the need for the restraining order, as well as the reasonableness of the fee award.

L.A. v. E.K. - Child Relocation and Custody Case

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's order granting a parent primary residence and permission to relocate with a child to Connecticut. The case involved child relocation and custody disputes between the parents.

Mitchell Kotler v. Noah Kane - Civil Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division dismissed the appeal in Mitchell Kotler v. Noah Kane (Docket No. A-2256-24) with prejudice and without costs, as the parties have settled their dispute. This non-precedential opinion is binding only on the parties involved.

DCPP v. M.M. and A.M. - Child Abuse and Neglect Case

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued an opinion in DCPP v. M.M. and A.M. concerning findings of abuse and neglect. The court found that the trial court improperly admitted hearsay opinions from a child psychologist, which were critical to the case's outcome. The decision may impact how child testimony and expert assessments are handled in future cases.

S.S. v. Woodcliff Lake Board of Education - Appeal of HIB Policy Decision

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed in part and remanded in part a decision regarding the dismissal of a complaint. The case involved a student disciplined under the Board's Harassment, Intimidation, and Bullying (HIB) policy and the subsequent appeal process.

New Jersey Solar Transition Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a decision by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities denying extension requests for solar energy projects under the Transition Incentive program. The court's opinion is non-precedential.

New Jersey Solar Transition Case Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the Board of Public Utilities' denial of extension requests for solar energy projects under the Transition Incentive (TI) program. The court's decision impacts Ecological Systems, LLC and NJ Solar Power regarding their project timelines and eligibility.

M.B.M. v. M.R.-l. - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a Family Part order regarding child custody and visitation. The court designated the plaintiff as the parent of primary residence and ordered supervised visitation for the defendant. The opinion is non-precedential.

New Jersey Solar Transition Program Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed a decision by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) regarding a solar energy project's certification. The court found that the BPU improperly denied a request for an extension to submit post-construction certification documents for a project registered in the Transition Incentive program.

Gold Tree Spa, Inc. v. Pd Nail Corp. - Appeal of Sanctions

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a trial judge's order sanctioning defendants PD Nail Corp., CD Nail Corp., Hee Jung Kim, and Sook Hee Kim an additional $39,274.31 for filing frivolous litigation. The defendants are appealing multiple prior orders related to discovery disputes and summary judgment.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, even though the documents might not be discoverable from the client abroad.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction Vacated

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

B.B. v. Hochul - Children's Due Process Rights in Foster Care

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's decision in B.B. v. Hochul, finding that plaintiffs (children removed from parents) have standing to sue over New York's certification scheme for relative foster parents. The court remanded for further proceedings, noting some claims were moot.

Care One LLC v NLRB - Unfair Labor Practices Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction for Care One LLC and its affiliates. The court found that despite arguments regarding the NLRB's quorum and ALJ appointment, the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm necessary for injunctive relief to halt unfair labor practice proceedings.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and vacated in part a lower court's decision in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of copyright management information claims but remanded copyright infringement claims for further proceedings, finding factual issues regarding DMCA safe harbor immunity.

Reidy Contracting Group LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage to Reidy Contracting Group, LLC. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and construed an ambiguous Employers Liability Exclusion against Mt. Hawley.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a district court decision concerning claims that CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions violated the Fair Housing Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials based on criminal history, but also found CoreLogic violated the FCRA regarding conservatorship documentation.

US v. Jiminez - Sentence Affirmation for Felony Conviction

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment against William Jimenez, upholding his 105-month sentence for possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. The court found no abuse of discretion in the imposed special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mental health counseling.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Summary Judgment Granted

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a Tax Court order that had granted summary judgment to Joseph Safdieh, ruling that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failing to report control of a foreign business. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.

US v. Aryeetey - Affirmation of Conviction and Sentence

The Second Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivanjoel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Miller v. Lamanna - Appeal of Dismissal

The Second Circuit vacated a district court's dismissal of a former corrections officer's race discrimination and retaliation claims. The appellate court found the district court erred by converting a summary judgment motion into a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal motion, considering only the complaint's allegations.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Concealed Carry License Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New York's concealed carry license laws. The court held that state court judges are absolutely immune from individual-capacity lawsuits and that federal courts lack jurisdiction for official-capacity claims seeking injunctive or declaratory relief due to Article III's case-or-controversy requirement.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review filed by Luis Peña Garcia, who sought reimbursement for medical cannabis edibles under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. The court affirmed the Department of Labor's decision, citing the Controlled Substances Act's classification of marijuana.

Mar-Can Transport v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a District Court ruling, directing the Local 854 Pension Fund to reduce Mar-Can Transportation Company's withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The decision interprets an ambiguous ERISA provision regarding the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch unions.

Bugliotti v. Argentina - Bondholders Sue for Defaulted Sovereign Bond Payments

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's dismissal of a case where bondholders sued the Republic of Argentina for defaulted sovereign bond payments. The court found that some of the bondholders' claims are timely under New York law and that they now have the authority under Argentine law to sue.

OFAC Adds Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood to SDN List

The US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has added the Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood to its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List. This action imposes sanctions on the entity and carries secondary sanctions risk under Executive Order 13224, as amended.

Garante Privacy Sanctions Aldilapp, Halts Non-Compliant Cameras

The Italian Garante Privacy has sanctioned Aldilapp and its distributors for non-compliant digital cemetery services, halting the use of non-compliant cameras. The authority also approved a delegation management platform and expressed global concerns regarding AI-generated intimate content.

HSE Reminds Employers of Health and Safety Duties for Home Workers

The UK's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is reminding employers that they have the same health and safety duties for home workers as for office-based staff. The guidance highlights key risk areas such as stress, mental health, and display screen equipment, and emphasizes that these responsibilities are legal duties, not optional.

Two companies and site manager prosecuted for asbestos disturbance

Two companies, Sohan Group Limited and Maize Metals Limited, and a site manager, Ali Raza Baig, have been prosecuted by the UK's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) for large-scale asbestos disturbance at a demolition site. Fines totaling over £88,000 were issued, and the site manager received a suspended prison sentence and director disqualification.

State v. Freed - Plea Withdrawal Denial

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's decision to deny a defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea without a hearing. The appellate court found that the trial court abused its discretion and remanded the case for further proceedings.

State v. Bingle - Theft and Attempted Extortion Convictions Upheld

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld the theft and attempted extortion convictions of Ryan T. Bingle. The court ruled that the offenses were not allied offenses of similar import, affirming the trial court's decision. The case involved threats made to establish ongoing coerced property surrender.

State v. Runyon - Sentencing Notification Error

The Ohio Court of Appeals found reversible error in the sentencing notification provided to the defendant in State v. Runyon. The court remanded the case for resentencing specifically to provide the defendant with mandatory statutory notifications regarding the indefinite nature of his sentence.

Anderson v. Bonnema - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's decision in Anderson v. Bonnema. The appellate court found that the trial court erred in dismissing the case with prejudice based on res judicata. The case involves a pro se appellant challenging the dismissal of his complaint.

State v. Griffis - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District, has issued a decision in State v. Griffis. The court granted the motion of appellant's counsel to withdraw and dismissed the appeal as wholly frivolous, finding no prejudicial error in the trial court proceedings.

American Express Natl. Bank v. Jenkins - Civ.R. 60(B) Relief Denial

The Ohio Court of Appeals denied a motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B) based on standing grounds. The court found that the original credit card issuer demonstrated standing and that the debtor's challenge constituted an improper collateral attack on the judgment.

State v. Myers - Consecutive Sentences Upheld

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld consecutive sentences imposed on Cory Thomas Myers, finding the trial court made the necessary findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The decision affirms the trial court's sentencing in two consolidated cases involving charges of gross sexual imposition, endangering children, and disseminating matter harmful to juveniles.

State v. Upkins - Drug Possession and Fair Trial Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant's drug possession convictions in State v. Upkins. The court found the convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence and that any prosecutorial misconduct did not constitute plain error. The defendant also failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel.

State v. Burch - Aggravated Arson Sentence Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and aggravated arson sentence of Michael Troy Burch. The court held that the trial court was not required to advise the defendant on potential sentence mergers and that the aggravated arson charges did not merge due to the risk to multiple victims. The amended sentencing order was deemed a permissible correction of a typographical error.