City of Idaho Falls v. Idaho Department of Water Resources - Water Rights Dispute

The Idaho Supreme Court issued a substitute opinion in the case of City of Idaho Falls v. Idaho Department of Water Resources, withdrawing a prior opinion dated December 31, 2025. The appeal concerning water rights distribution was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Spears v. Antelope Mountain Resort, LLC - Idaho Supreme Court Opinion

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in Spears v. Antelope Mountain Resort, LLC, ruling that a property owner may not be held civilly liable for the criminal acts of her grandson. The court found no duty to aid or protect the victim from the grandson's actions.

Vann Bragg v. State of Arkansas - Supreme Court Opinion

The Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed a lower court's denial of a Rule 37 petition. The petition alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel in the case of Vann Bragg, who was convicted of first-degree murder and battery. The court found no clear error in the lower court's decision.

State v. Roy Nichols, Jr. - Rape Shield Statute Scope

The Arkansas Supreme Court reversed a lower court's decision regarding the admissibility of evidence under the state's rape-shield statute in the case of State v. Roy Nichols, Jr. The court found that evidence of prior sexual conduct was not admissible in this instance, reversing the trial court's ruling.

Arkansas Access to Justice Commission Appointment

The Supreme Court of Arkansas has appointed Judge Thomas Potter to the Arkansas Access to Justice Commission for a three-year term. Deepali Lal and Kyle Burton were reappointed to the Board of Directors of the Arkansas Access to Justice Foundation, Inc. The court expressed gratitude to Judge Kim Bridgforth for her service.

Arkansas Access to Justice Commission Appointments

The Supreme Court of Arkansas has issued an opinion appointing Judge Thomas Potter to the Arkansas Access to Justice Commission for a three-year term. Additionally, Deepali Lal and Kyle Burton have been reappointed to the Board of Directors of the Arkansas Access to Justice Foundation, Inc. for three-year terms.

Bryan Norris v. Independence County - Election Dispute

The Supreme Court of Arkansas issued a dissenting opinion regarding the handling of an election dispute case involving Independence County. The dissent argues for expedited resolution of jurisdictional questions in election matters, citing federal court precedents for rapid decision-making.

State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto - Criminal Appeal

The Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto, vacating and remanding the Court of Appeals' decision. The court addressed issues regarding the denial of a motion to suppress evidence found during a traffic stop and the appellate standard of review for video evidence.

Knight v. Fontes - Arizona Supreme Court Opinion

The Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in Knight v. Fontes, affirming the constitutionality of the retention election process for court of appeals judges as established by A.R.S. § 12-120.02. The court found no violation of the Free and Equal Elections Clause or the Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Arizona Constitution.

State of Arizona v. hon.gordon/owen - Criminal Case Opinion

The Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in State of Arizona v. hon.gordon/owen, docket number CR-24-0064-PR, filed on December 12, 2025. The court reversed a lower court's decision regarding charges under an enhanced penalty statute for a traffic violation resulting in death.

State of Arizona v. Hon. marner/haniffa - Sentencing Enhancement Ruling

The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that a conviction for luring a minor for sexual exploitation can qualify for a Dangerous Crime Against Children sentencing enhancement, even if the "minor" victim is fictitious. The court reversed and remanded the case, vacating the Court of Appeals opinion.

Arizona Supreme Court Opinion in Re: MH2023-004502

The Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case In Re: MH2023-004502, vacating a prior Court of Appeals opinion. The case concerns the legal process for involuntary mental health treatment in Arizona, referencing specific statutes related to court-ordered evaluations and treatment petitions.

Howard v. D.C. Employment Services - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The D.C. Court of Appeals affirmed a Compensation Review Board decision granting temporary total disability benefits to an employee for an occupational disease. The court found the employee's carpal tunnel syndrome led to her resignation and upheld the board's findings.

Jennings & Turner v. US - Court Opinion

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed some convictions for appellant Derek Brian Turner related to violent incidents but reversed accessory after the fact convictions for appellant Ronnika M. Jennings due to insufficient evidence. Both appellants' obstruction of justice convictions were vacated.

Hewitt v. United States - Felony Murder Conviction Vacatur

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Hewitt v. United States that trial courts must vacate the predicate felony conviction when a defendant is convicted of both first-degree felony murder and the underlying felony, to avoid violating the Double Jeopardy Clause. The court clarified that the trial court has no discretion to choose which conviction to vacate.

Grant v. United States - Court Opinion on Motion to Suppress

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence in Grant v. United States. The court found that the police did not seize the appellant until after he discarded a satchel containing a gun, thus the evidence was not the fruit of an illegal seizure.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals - Disbarment of Paul Gerard Wersant

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals has disbarred Paul Gerard Wersant from the practice of law. This action follows the Supreme Court of Florida's permanent revocation of his license and his failure to respond to the court's order to show cause. His disbarment is effective pending his compliance with specific filing requirements.

Helms v. State - Second-Degree Murder Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a conviction for second-degree murder in Helms v. State. The appellant claimed self-defense immunity and errors in jury instructions and evidence sufficiency. The court found no abuse of discretion and sufficient evidence for the conviction.

Joshua John O'Dell v. State of Wyoming - Criminal Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a minor. The defendant appealed, challenging rulings on cross-examination and evidence admissibility. The court found no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decisions.

Castaner v. State of Wyoming - Sentencing Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's sentence for a juvenile convicted of second-degree murder. The appellant argued the sentence violated constitutional prohibitions against cruel or unusual punishment, but the court found it was within statutory limits.

Allen v. Allen - Marital Property Division Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's decision in the divorce case of Allen v. Allen. The appellant husband appealed the division of marital property and an equalization payment of $850,000, but the court found no abuse of discretion.

Baier v. State of Wyoming - Restitution Award Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a restitution award of $92,722.79 against Kylea Rae Baier. Baier appealed, arguing that certain credit card charges should be excluded from the award because the victim received a benefit. The court found no abuse of discretion in the district court's decision.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bryant H. Klos - Disciplinary Action

The Wisconsin Supreme Court released an opinion in the case of Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bryant H. Klos on January 9, 2026. This case involves disciplinary action against a legal professional. The full opinion is available in PDF format.

State v. Michael Joseph Gasper - Criminal Opinion

The Wisconsin Supreme Court released its opinion in State v. Michael Joseph Gasper on January 14, 2026. This is a published opinion, meaning it is the final version and will appear in the official reports.

State v. Andreas W. Rauch Sharak - Criminal Opinion

The Wisconsin Supreme Court released its opinion in State v. Andreas W. Rauch Sharak on February 24, 2026. The case number is 2024AP000469-CR. The opinion is available in PDF format and is subject to further editing before appearing in the official bound reports.

State v. J. D. B. - Criminal Opinion

The Wisconsin Supreme Court released its opinion in State v. J. D. B. on February 25, 2026. The case number is 2023AP000715-CR. This is a published opinion, and the final version will appear in the official reports.

Billy Johnson v. Blackhawk Mining - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals is reviewing a decision concerning Billy Johnson's workers' compensation claim against Blackhawk Mining. The appeal challenges the denial of temporary total disability benefits and the exclusion of a cervical strain as a compensable condition.

ACNR Resources v. Miller - Workers' Comp Appeal Decision

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed a decision granting Ronald Miller 8.25% permanent partial disability for occupational hearing loss. The court found that the employer, ACNR Resources, Inc., failed to demonstrate reversible error in the Intermediate Court of Appeals' affirmation of the Board of Review's decision.

Conley v. Logan County Board of Education - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed a decision rejecting a workers' compensation claim. The claimant, a physical education teacher, appealed after her claim for hip and back pain sustained while leading kindergarteners in dancing was denied. The court found no reversible error in the lower courts' decisions.

Parental Rights Termination Appeal Affirmed

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order terminating a mother's parental rights. The mother appealed, arguing the court erred by refusing to continue a hearing when neither she nor her attorney were present. The court found no error in the lower court's decision.

Devon Woodward Appeal - Supervised Release Revocation

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals issued a memorandum decision affirming a lower court's order revoking Devon Woodward's supervised release. Woodward appealed, arguing his sentence was disproportionate, but the court found no substantial legal question or prejudicial error.

Public Health Alert for Misbranded Beef Jerky Products

The USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has issued a public health alert for ready-to-eat beef jerky products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens. The affected products were produced by a firm that is not subject to FSIS inspection, raising concerns about potential contamination and allergen exposure.

Supreme Court of Virginia Opinions and Published Orders

The Supreme Court of Virginia has published new opinions and published orders, including decisions on arbitration awards, sovereign immunity claims, and public utility certificate approvals. These documents provide guidance on legal standards and affirm or remand lower court decisions.

Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee Opinions on Judicial Conduct

The Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (JEAC) of the Supreme Court of Virginia has issued advisory opinions regarding judicial conduct. These opinions clarify compliance with the Canons of Judicial Conduct for judges and individuals subject to these canons.

Naji Dyall v. Walton County Officer Guard West - Dismissal Order

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia dismissed the case Naji Dyall v. Walton County Officer Guard West without prejudice. The dismissal was due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with court orders regarding the filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and to respond to a show cause order.

Tractor Supply Co. v. Coblentz - Statutory Employer Liability

The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that a retail store purchaser of products is not a statutory employer of a product vendor's injured employee under state workers' compensation statutes. The court clarified that a vendor-vendee relationship, even with ancillary delivery services, does not fall under the "subcontractor" definition for "statutory employer" liability.

Tennessee Jurisdiction for Arbitration Award Confirmation

The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that Tennessee courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to confirm an arbitration award if the parties agreed that arbitration would occur in another state. This decision vacates lower court judgments and dismisses the petition to confirm the award.

Workers' Comp Review and Aggravation Injury Compensability Clarified

The Supreme Court of Tennessee clarified the standard of review for factual findings in workers' compensation cases and the criteria for compensability of aggravation injuries. The court held that the standard of review is de novo on the record unless the preponderance of the evidence shows otherwise, and aggravation injuries do not require proof of permanent worsening to be compensable.

Ashworth v. Pendelton - Inheritance Dispute

This document details a fictional court case concerning a dispute over an inheritance. The will of Lord Ashworth bequeaths his fortune to his cat, Whiskers, and a diamond to the solver of a riddle. The case explores the legalities of such bequests and the interpretation of a will's conditions.

Supreme Court Rules on Quarry Zoning Resolution

The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that Grundy County enacted a resolution regulating quarry locations without following statutory zoning procedures. The court reversed a lower court decision, finding the resolution to be an invalid zoning ordinance. This decision impacts local government authority in land use regulation.

State of Oregon v. Worsham - Reconsideration of Supreme Court Opinion

The Oregon Supreme Court granted reconsideration in State v. Worsham, modifying its prior opinion. The court reversed the Court of Appeals' decision and remanded the case for further proceedings, specifically to address a second assignment of error that had not been previously considered.

State v. Ribas - Oregon Supreme Court Affirmance

The Oregon Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court in the case of State v. Ribas. The case was argued in September 2025 and the decision was issued on January 29, 2026.

State of Oregon v. Allen Rex Roberts - Mandamus Case

The Oregon Supreme Court dismissed the alternative writ of mandamus in State of Oregon v. Allen Rex Roberts (SC S071661). The case originated from a Multnomah County Circuit Court order and involved arguments from various legal parties and amici curiae.

State v. Fletes - Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied

The Oregon Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by the State of Oregon against Dominic Fletes. The court's decision was issued on February 5, 2026, with one justice dissenting.

State v. Bonnell - Fourth Amendment Facebook Search

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed a conviction, ruling that a sender has no reasonable expectation of privacy in electronic messages stored on a recipient's device. The court also found that while law enforcement's search of the appellant's Facebook accounts lacked temporal limitations, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

State v. Nicholas Firkus - First-Degree Murder Conviction Affirmed

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed the first-degree murder conviction of Nicholas James Firkus. The court found sufficient circumstantial evidence to support the conviction and that the district court applied the correct standard when considering motions for judgment of acquittal.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has filed an opinion on March 2nd, 2026. This document represents a judicial decision and is now publicly available through the Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library.

State v. Liech - Criminal Appeal

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Liech. This document represents the court's final decision on the matter, which likely pertains to a criminal appeal. The opinion is now publicly available through the Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library.

State v Dale - Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Dale. This document represents a final judicial decision on the matter, adding to the body of case law.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion on Estate of Meyers

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued an opinion regarding the Estate of Meyers. This document is a published court opinion, indicating a final decision on a legal matter within the state's judicial system.