State v. McInnes - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentence of Ian W. McInnes. The court addressed issues including the burden of proof for affirmative defenses, admissibility of lay opinion testimony, sufficiency of evidence, confrontation rights, Garrity statements, grand-jury transcripts, and sentencing.

State v. Jackson - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a conviction for endangering children in the case of State v. Jackson. The court found that the state failed to establish that the appellant created a substantial risk to the health or safety of the child as required by statute.

State v. Gill - Weapons Charge Acquittal

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's denial of a motion for acquittal on weapons charges for Lee Gill. The court found insufficient evidence presented by the state for both the weapons under disability and tampering with evidence charges, entering a judgment of acquittal.

Mitchell Family Trust Fund v. Cole - Summary Judgment Vacated

The Ohio Court of Appeals vacated a trial court's decision granting summary judgment on third-party claims. The appellate court remanded the case with instructions to deem the third-party claims and the summary judgment motion moot, as they were derivative of the primary claims.

Price v. Price - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in the case of Price v. Price. The appellate court found no merit in the appellant's arguments regarding summary judgment, land installment contract law, and jurisdiction over personal property.

Shaker Hts. v. Patterson - Traffic Violation Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision finding Larry Reginald Patterson guilty of two traffic violations. Patterson's appeal, which raised issues of discovery violations and alleged financial instrument irregularities, was denied as he failed to file a transcript and raise issues properly on appeal.

University Heights v Weizman - Public Nuisance Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision finding a property a public nuisance and appointing a receiver. The court found the property unfit for habitation and a fire hazard, upholding the appointment of a receiver to manage abatement prior to a full repair estimate.

Yates v. Rigby - Appellate Review of Divorce

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's divorce judgment in Yates v. Rigby. The appellate court presumed the regularity of proceedings and affirmed due to the appellant's failure to provide a transcript and lack of cognizable legal argument.

State v. Green - Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for second-degree robbery in State v. Green. The court ruled that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea was outside the scope of the appeal as it was filed in a related trial court case. The court also found no error in imposing the maximum sentence.

Cleveland v. Shaker Heights Apartments Owner, LLC - Housing Court Abuse of Discretion

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a housing court's denial of the City of Cleveland's motion to dismiss charges against Shaker Heights Apartments Owner, LLC. The appellate court found the housing court abused its discretion by not allowing the City to argue facts and by partially applying the test for good cause, remanding the case to grant the dismissal.

Mitchell Family Trust Fund v. Cole - Trademark Infringement Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's summary judgment orders in the case of Mitchell Family Trust Fund v. Cole. The appellate court found that the appellants did not properly raise discovery disputes with the trial court and that their demand for a manifest-weight-of-the-evidence review was inappropriate for summary judgment orders.

Ohio Court of Appeals Denies Custody Hearing Continuance

The Ohio Court of Appeals denied a father's request to continue a permanent custody hearing. The court found no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision, affirming the granting of permanent custody to Franklin County Children Services.

Sager v. Sager - Child and Spousal Support Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment regarding child and spousal support calculations in the case of Sager v. Sager. The decision addresses the division of marital property and the establishment of staged support obligations tied to the sale of the marital residence.

Gomez-Gomez v. Hrycak - Default Judgment for Accident Damages

The Delaware Superior Court entered a default judgment against Elizabeth M. Hrycak in favor of Gladys M. Gomez-Gomez for damages resulting from a car accident. The judgment includes $2,000 for medical bills and $5,000 for pain and suffering, plus costs and post-judgment interest.

State v. Ushery - Postconviction Relief Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied Calvin Ushery's motion for postconviction relief without prejudice. The court found the motion lacked sufficient factual and legal basis for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and denied the request for appointed counsel.

State v. Earl - Postconviction Relief Motion Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied Melvin L. Earl's motion for postconviction relief. The court considered the defendant's plea agreement, sentencing, and subsequent filings before issuing its decision.

McGinnis v. Gold Medal Gymnastics: Motion to Dismiss Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied a motion to dismiss filed by Gold Medal Gymnastics Academy LLC in a case involving a minor's injury. The court found that neither of the two waivers presented by the parties were sufficiently clear under Delaware law to absolve the gymnastics academy of liability for potential negligence.

Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Instagram, LLC - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Delaware Superior Court issued a corrected memorandum opinion in Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Instagram, LLC. The court denied defendants' motion to dismiss or stay and granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, impacting insurance coverage disputes.

Harihar v. Commonwealth - Judicial Review of Lower Court Orders

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts affirmed a lower court's denial of a petition seeking relief from multiple lower court orders and judgments. The petitioner, Mohan A. Harihar, appealed the denial of his petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, which sought to void judgments related to a foreclosure and eviction dating back to 2010. The court found that Harihar had not demonstrated an adequate alternative remedy or exceptional circumstances for the court's extraordinary intervention.

Matter of Henderson - Attorney Disciplinary Proceeding

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued a court opinion in the Matter of Craig Lee Henderson on March 5, 2026. The Attorney Grievance Committee seeks an order disbarring respondent, Craig Lee Henderson, due to prior disciplinary actions in California.

De Castro v. West Farms Apts. LLC - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed lower court orders severing third-party actions in the case of De Castro v. West Farms Apts. LLC. The court considered the merits of a motion for leave to reargue, effectively granting it.

People v. Newton - Criminal Appeal Decision

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a judgment against Jamar Newton. The court found the sentence imposed was not excessive. This decision was issued on March 5, 2026.

Schiff v. Intersystem S&S Corp. - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued an opinion in Schiff v. Intersystem S&S Corp. The court modified a lower court's order, granting summary judgment on liability against Intersystem S&S Corp. and on a breach of contract claim for failure to procure insurance.

Matter of Bland - Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued a court opinion in the Matter of Lamon Darrell Bland. The case concerns disciplinary proceedings against a suspended attorney. The opinion was decided and entered on March 5, 2026.

Matter of Cantor - Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued an opinion in the Matter of Matthew Cantor, a suspended attorney. The court denied Cantor's motion for reinstatement and is proceeding with disciplinary charges for the unauthorized practice of law while suspended.

Brooks v. Ghazi et al - Stockholders Suit

A new civil case, Brooks v. Ghazi et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 5, 2026. The case, identified by docket number 3:26-cv-01944, is categorized as a Stockholders Suit under Federal Question jurisdiction. The initial filings include a complaint and proposed summons.

FCA Announces Senior Leadership Appointments

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has announced two senior leadership appointments: Chris Knight as Director of Insurance and David Lymburn as interim Deputy Managing Director of the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR). These appointments aim to strengthen the FCA's capabilities and support its strategic priorities.

FCA warns customers of unsuitable advice from HDH Investment Services

The FCA has warned customers of HDH Investment Services Limited that the firm may have provided unsuitable financial advice. Restrictions were placed on HDH from January 20, 2026, preventing it from conducting regulated activities. Customers who believe they received unsuitable advice are advised to complain and seek advice from another authorised firm.

Environment Agency v. Action Skip Hire Limited - Waste Removal Order

The Environment Agency has ordered Birmingham skip firm Action Skip Hire Limited to pay £9,495.50 for failing to remove waste from a site as previously ordered by a magistrates' court. This follows a prior conviction where the company was fined over £48,000 for operating an illegal waste site.

World HPV Day: Infection Statistics, Cancer Prevention, and Vaccination

This notice from the Virginia Department of Health discusses World HPV Awareness Day, providing statistics on HPV infection, its link to cancer, and prevention methods. It highlights the effectiveness of the HPV vaccine and screening for cervical cancer, along with other prevention steps.

Potomac River Recreational Water Advisory Partially Lifted

The Virginia Department of Health (VDH) has partially lifted a recreational water advisory for the Potomac River, effective March 5, 2026. The advisory remains in place north of Chain Bridge due to elevated E. coli levels following a sewage spill.

In re Tanaka Trust - Trust Dispute Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals filed an opinion on March 5, 2026, regarding an appeal in the matter of the Raymond K. Tanaka Trust. The case involves a dispute over residential property ownership and Lance K. Tanaka's beneficial interests in the trust.

W.C. v. T.C. - Hawaii Family Court Custody Modification Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed a family court's decision denying a mother's motion to modify a custody order for unsupervised visitation. The court found the mother failed to prove a change in circumstances warranting modification.

A.B. v. J.M. - Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued an amended order dismissing the appeal of J.M. in the case A.B. v. J.M. The dismissal is due to a lack of jurisdiction, as the Family Court had not entered a final order for dissolution of marriage, and the appealed order was not independently appealable. The court will take no further action on related orders.

TBC Koloa Town, LLC v. Pizzetta, Inc. - Contempt Order Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals is reviewing a contempt order against Catherine M. Shyne. The court noted significant non-compliance with appellate rules in Shyne's opening brief, potentially impacting the appeal's progression. The case involves a contempt order related to a civil case.

NIA Webinar on Expanding Research in AD/ADRD R25 Programs

The National Institute on Aging (NIA) announced a pre-application technical assistance webinar for individuals interested in applying for the NIA Expanding Research in AD/ADRD (ERA) R25 Postbaccalaureate and Summer Research Education Programs. The webinar will be held virtually on April 8, 2026, and aims to provide guidance on the application process.

NIH ICorps Entrepreneurship Training for SBIR/STTR Awardees

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has announced the ICorps at NIH program, offering entrepreneurship training for Phase I SBIR/STTR awardees. The program aims to help small businesses develop and validate business models for commercialization. Applications are due by March 27, 2026, and April 17, 2026.

United States v. Emory Day - Criminal Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of United States v. Emory Day, docket number 25-1050. The court affirmed the district court's decision regarding a search warrant application based on evidence of child pornography distribution.

Ortiz-Leon v. Bondi - Immigration Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in the case of Diego Ortiz-Leon v. Pamela Bondi. The court affirmed the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision denying asylum and withholding of removal, finding no nexus between the petitioners' protected characteristics and claimed persecution.

United States v. Socrates Martinez-Hipolito - Sixth Circuit Non-Precedential Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision regarding a search warrant in the case of United States v. Socrates Martinez-Hipolito. The court found no error in the district court's decision not to suppress evidence related to the production of child pornography.

United States v. LaVaughn Odom - Sentencing Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the 192-month sentence for LaVaughn Odom, who was convicted of drug trafficking and firearm offenses. The court found the sentence, which was below the Sentencing Guidelines range, to be procedurally and substantively reasonable. The appeal concerned the reasonableness of the sentence imposed by the district court.

United States v. Derek Hahn - Sixth Circuit Non-Precedential Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's sentence of Derek Hahn, who was convicted of using a minor to produce sexually explicit videos. The court found Hahn's sentence of 330 months to be reasonable despite his arguments for a downward variance.

United States v. Dustin Newsome - Sentencing Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence of Dustin Newsome, who was convicted of child pornography offenses. Newsome was sentenced to 420 months imprisonment for inducing minors to send sexually explicit content and possessing child pornography.

Williams v. Gage - Legal Malpractice Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's decision granting summary judgment to a defendant attorney in a legal malpractice case. The plaintiff failed to designate a required expert witness within the court's established deadlines, leading to the dismissal of her claim.

Delaware Court of Chancery: Order Compelling Production of Trial Witness

The Delaware Court of Chancery ordered Summit Healthcare Operating Partnership, L.P. to produce a trial witness after the plaintiff initially declined. The court granted the defendant's motion to compel, allowing the witness to either appear in person or testify remotely within a two-week period.

AIG Specialty Insurance Co. v. Genworth Financial Inc. - Insurance Judgment Affirmance

The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a Superior Court judgment in the case of AIG Specialty Insurance Company et al. v. Genworth Financial Inc. et al. The decision upholds the lower court's rulings on summary judgment motions, concluding the appellate review of the insurance dispute.

Tanaka Trust Dispute - Summary Disposition Order

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii issued a summary disposition order in the trust dispute concerning the Raymond K. Tanaka Trust. This order addresses the appeal from the Circuit Court's final judgment regarding property ownership and Lance Tanaka's beneficial rights in the trust.

Amended order dismisses appeal for lack of jurisdiction

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii issued an amended order dismissing an appeal filed by J.M. The dismissal is due to a lack of jurisdiction, as the Family Court had not yet entered a dissolution of marriage order, rendering the appealed order not independently appealable. The court will take no further action on related orders and motions.

Supreme Court Rejects Application for Writ of Certiorari

The Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi has rejected an application for a writ of certiorari filed by William F. McKenzie and others. This decision means the lower court's ruling will stand, and the case will not be heard by the Supreme Court.

Court affirms denial of mother's motion for unsupervised visitation

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaiʻi affirmed a family court's denial of a mother's motion to modify a custody order for unsupervised visitation. The court found the mother failed to prove a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant further modification.