Latosha Bowlin v. Board of Directors, Judah Christian School - Employment Discrimination

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a Title VII claim brought by three school employees who refused COVID-19 vaccination and testing due to religious beliefs. The court found no religious objection to the testing requirement and that accommodating the employees would contradict state executive orders.

Majeika v. Rhode Island Supreme Court Opinion

The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a property owner's appeal regarding the denial of an onsite wastewater treatment system application. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a continuing violation and lacked standing for a facial challenge to regulations.

Innospec v. Aurorium - Motion to Dismiss

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware issued a Report and Recommendation regarding a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Aurorium Holdings LLC, et al. in the case Innospec Inc. v. Aurorium Holdings LLC. The court reviewed the legal standards for a motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6).

Thomas v. Claymont Associates, LLC - Motion for Judgment on Pleadings

The Delaware Superior Court is considering a motion for judgment on the pleadings in the case of Thomas v. Claymont Associates, LLC. The defendant, Easy Money Group Acquisition Co., LLC, argues it is not responsible for the plaintiff's alleged slip and fall injuries due to lease agreement terms. The court is reviewing whether the motion should be treated as a motion for summary judgment.

Arizona Court of Appeals - Parental Rights Termination

The Arizona Court of Appeals vacated and remanded an order terminating parental rights for M.M. The court found that the Department of Child Safety did not offer reasonable reunification efforts to the father, who was incarcerated. The decision highlights the importance of adequate reunification services in parental rights cases.

Fadlon v. Cleverly - Arizona Court of Appeals

The Arizona Court of Appeals addressed whether a pre-decree ruling on the enforceability of a premarital agreement can be certified as final and immediately appealable. The court also considered the showing required to override a spousal maintenance waiver in a premarital agreement when it leads to public assistance eligibility.

State v. Thomas - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in State v. Thomas, affirming the appellant's convictions and sentences for murder, armed robbery, and burglary. The court corrected the sentencing order regarding non-repetitive counts, excluded assessments, and adjusted presentence incarceration credit.

Champagne v. Bozer - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in Champagne v. Bozer, affirming the removal of a co-trustee but reversing the denial of litigation expense reimbursement. The court found no abuse of discretion in removing the trustee but held that trust language allowed for reimbursement of expenses.

Commonwealth v. Pharrel P. - Juvenile Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential memorandum and order affirming a juvenile's adjudication of delinquency for carrying a firearm without a license and carrying a loaded firearm. The juvenile was committed to the Department of Youth Services until age eighteen.

David Ladd v. Alina Bosch - Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming judgments related to a construction dispute. The court affirmed the dismissal of claims under the New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act and upheld a jury verdict for abuse of process. The decision is primarily directed to the parties involved.

Papadopoulos v. Dunn - Massachusetts Appeals Court Non-Precedential Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Papadopoulos v. Dunn, affirming a lower court's judgment. The court found no evidence of causation presented by the plaintiff, thus upholding the dismissal of the case. This decision serves as persuasive authority but not binding precedent.

Robert X. Jenkins v. Shantal M. Jenkins - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a judgment of contempt against Shantal M. Jenkins for failing to comply with a modification judgment regarding child support payments and providing proof of address. The court found her arguments regarding duress and lack of notification unpersuasive.

Commonwealth v. Dennis L. Coates, Jr. - Criminal Appeal

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential memorandum and order in Commonwealth v. Dennis L. Coates, Jr. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for assault and battery on a family or household member, finding that the prosecutor's closing argument did not improperly refer to facts not in evidence.

Latin America Crime Risk Trends 2025-2026

This notice analyzes political, economic, and financial crime risk trends in Latin America for 2025-2026. It highlights the impact of electoral cycles, US national security policies, and organized crime on financial institutions and corporate governance across the region.

High Court Re-Affirms 'One-Stop' Dispute Resolution in Arbitration Award Challenges

The English High Court has dismissed a challenge to an arbitral award, confirming an arbitrator's jurisdiction in a Section 67 challenge. The ruling reinforces the principle of 'one-stop' dispute resolution, particularly in settlement agreements, and clarifies the scope of an arbitrator's authority.

Importers' Path to Recover IEEPA Tariffs After Supreme Court Ruling

A recent article discusses the implications of a Supreme Court ruling invalidating tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Importers must take affirmative legal action, such as filing suit in the U.S. Court of International Trade, to recover paid tariffs, as refunds are not automatic.

SEC Exempts Foreign Companies' D&Os from Insider Reporting

The SEC has issued an order exempting directors and officers (D&Os) of certain foreign private issuers (FPIs) from Section 16(a) insider reporting requirements. This exemption, effective March 18, 2026, applies to D&Os in qualifying jurisdictions like Canada, the EU, and the UK, relieving them of the obligation to report initial ownership and subsequent transactions within two business days.

SEC Exempts Foreign Private Issuer Directors/Officers from Section 16(a) Filings

The SEC has issued an order granting an exemption from Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting requirements for officers and directors of certain foreign private issuers (FPIs). This exemption applies to FPIs incorporated in qualifying jurisdictions with substantially similar disclosure regulations, such as Canada, the EEA, the UK, and others. The order aims to align with the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act.

Court Orders Refund of Invalid Tariffs on IEEPA Goods

The U.S. Court of International Trade ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to refund invalid tariffs charged under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This ruling provides nationwide relief for importers, though an appeal is expected.

US and Hong Kong Stablecoin and Crypto-Asset Regulation Analysis

This analysis compares the regulatory approaches to stablecoins and crypto-assets in the US and Hong Kong as of March 2026. It highlights the US's evolving fragmented approach, including the GENIUS Act, and Hong Kong's unified, purpose-built licensing framework. The document aims to guide market participants through these distinct regulatory landscapes.

UK PSR Seeks Merchant Survey Views on Interchange Fees

The UK Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) is seeking comments on a draft merchant survey questionnaire as part of its review of cross-border interchange fees. The survey aims to gather data on merchants' processing costs for online payments from the EEA to inform fee levels. The deadline for comments is March 5, 2026.

Regulation of AI in Drug Development: US, EU, and UK Approaches

Regulators in the US, EU, and UK are developing approaches to govern the use of AI in drug development, focusing on patient safety and research integrity. Key initiatives include common principles agreed upon by the EMA and FDA, and international harmonization efforts for AI/ML-enabled medical devices.

UK Cryptoasset Prudential Regime Proposals

The UK FCA has proposed a new prudential regime for cryptoasset firms, introducing capital, liquidity, risk management, and governance requirements. This consultation aims to ensure firms have sufficient financial resources and operational continuity. The regime is expected to come into force in October 2027.

Court of International Trade Orders Refunds for IEEPA Tariffs

The Court of International Trade (CIT) has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to issue refunds for tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This decision follows a Supreme Court ruling invalidating these tariffs and applies to importers whose liquidations are not final.

SEC Grants Conditional Reporting Relief for Foreign Private Issuers

The SEC has issued an exemptive order providing conditional relief from Section 16(a) insider reporting requirements for certain foreign private issuers. This relief applies when insiders are subject to substantially similar reporting obligations in their home jurisdiction, aiming to avoid duplicative filings.

UK Employment Rights Act 2025 Reforms

The UK's Employment Rights Act 2025, passed on December 18, 2025, introduces significant reforms to employment law. These changes, phased in from 2026 to 2027, affect industrial action, family leave, statutory sick pay, and dismissal rights, with the establishment of a new Fair Work Agency.

EU Industrial Accelerator Act: Focus on Green and Procurement

The EU has published a proposal for its Industrial Accelerator Act, shifting focus from high-tech sectors to decarbonizing heavy industry and introducing 'Buy European' rules for public procurement. The Act aims to bolster EU industrial capacity and competitiveness, with significant implications for supply chains and international trade relations.

Court Orders Tariff Refunds for Importers

The U.S. Court of International Trade has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to refund duties collected under the now-unlawful IEEPA tariffs. This decision follows a Supreme Court ruling and impacts importers nationwide, with specific actions required for refund eligibility.

Basel Committee Report on Synthetic Risk Transfer Markets

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a report analyzing the growth of synthetic risk transfer (SRT) markets, which provide capital relief for banks managing corporate credit risk. The report identifies trends and supervisory concerns, estimating protected assets at approximately EUR 750 billion.

Net-Zero GHG Emissions News and Views

Baker Botts L.L.P. has published Edition 42 of their 'P2N0 - News and Views on the Drive Towards Net-Zero GHG Emissions' newsletter. This edition, dated March 6, 2026, provides updates and insights on the global efforts to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.

Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs; Trade Court Orders Refund Path

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by the Trump administration were unlawful. Following this decision, the Court of International Trade has ordered a process for importers to seek refunds of these invalidated tariffs.

Colorado Bankruptcy Court Denies Law Firm Employment Application

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado denied an application by the Johnson Law Firm to be employed as attorneys for the Chapter 7 Trustee. The denial was based on the firm's requested contingent fee agreement, which the court found inappropriate for this case.

EU-Canada CETA Trade Agreement Updates and Digital Trade Negotiations Launched

The EU and Canada have advanced their trade relationship under the CETA agreement by adopting an interpretation on investment provisions and expediting dispute resolution for SMEs. They also agreed to amend the GMP Protocol to include active pharmaceutical ingredients and launched negotiations for a Digital Trade Agreement.

EU and Canada Launch Digital Trade Agreement Negotiations

The EU and Canada have launched negotiations for a Digital Trade Agreement (DTA) to facilitate digital trade and enhance consumer protection. This agreement aims to establish clear rules for digital transactions, building on the existing CETA framework and complementing the non-binding Digital Partnership.

Jones v. City of North Las Vegas - Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed an amended opinion in Jones v. City of North Las Vegas, concerning a Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment violation. The court reversed in part and affirmed in part the district court's summary judgment, impacting qualified immunity for officers involved in a search and shooting incident.

Renteria v. Grieg Star AS - Maritime Worker Negligence Appeal

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment for Grieg Star AS in a maritime worker's vessel negligence appeal. Balvina Renteria, an injured longshore worker, alleged negligence under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act.

Crawford Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference - Opinion

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued an opinion in the case of Crawford Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Southern Reporter.

Smith et al. v. ARC Realty et al. - Supreme Court Opinion

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued an opinion in the case of Brian Smith et al. v. ARC Realty et al. The case involves claims of fraud, breach of contract, and conspiracy related to property development around Lake Martin. The opinion is subject to formal revision before publication.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving church property and governance. The case, docketed as SC-2025-0462, addresses petitions for writs of mandamus related to multiple church entities and the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church.

In re Mt. Zion v. Alabama-West Florida Conference - Petition for Writ of Mandamus

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued a notice regarding multiple petitions for writs of mandamus filed by the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. and its Board of Trustees. These petitions are related to various underlying circuit court cases concerning church property and governance.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued a legal opinion regarding a dispute involving the Daleville First Methodist Church and the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church. The opinion addresses multiple related cases filed under various docket numbers.

Armstrong Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference - Mandamus Petition

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued an opinion related to petitions for writs of mandamus filed by the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The case involves disputes concerning church property and governance. The opinion is subject to formal revision before publication.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on ARC Realty Case

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a case involving ARC Realty, LLC and Brian Smith. The opinion addresses a petition for a writ of mandamus related to a dispute over property development around Lake Martin. The case involves claims of fraud, breach of contract, and conspiracy.

Estate of Milner v. Community Health Systems - Wrongful Death Mandamus

The Supreme Court of Alabama is considering a petition for writ of mandamus in a wrongful-death action. The plaintiff initially named the incorrect defendant and failed to substitute the proper party within the statute of limitations. The court will determine if the plaintiff's amended complaint relates back to the original filing date.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued a legal opinion regarding a dispute involving the Sunflower United Methodist Church, Inc. and the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The opinion addresses multiple related petitions for writs of mandamus.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church. The case, docketed as SC-2025-0851, addresses a petition for a writ of mandamus related to church property and governance.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The case, docketed as SC-2025-0514, concerns property and governance issues within the church. The opinion is subject to formal revision before publication.

Baggett Chapel Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference - Writ of Mandamus

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued a legal opinion regarding the case In re: Baggett Chapel United Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference. The opinion, filed on March 6, 2026, addresses a Petition for Writ of Mandamus related to property disputes involving local churches and the conference. This ruling will impact the governance and property rights of United Methodist churches within the conference.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Trinity United Methodist Church Case

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving Trinity United Methodist Church and its conference. The case concerns property and governance issues within the church structure. Multiple related appeals are consolidated under docket number SC-2025-0543.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving church property and governance. The case, In re: Ham Chapel Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc., addresses multiple related petitions for writs of mandamus filed by the Alabama-West Florida Conference.