Gerard v. Cuevas - Unlawful Detainer Rent Case Opinion

This document is an opinion from a California court regarding an unlawful detainer rent case, Gerard v. Cuevas. It provides a judicial interpretation of relevant housing and landlord-tenant laws.

Esparza v. Superior Court Case Information

This notice provides case information for Esparza v. Superior Court, identified by case number E085807. The update is from the California Courts Appellate Cases system. No specific compliance actions or deadlines are detailed.

Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc. - Civil Litigation

This document pertains to the civil case Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc., case number A171546, filed in a US court. The filing represents a new addition to the court's docket, initiating legal proceedings between the named parties.

Antifa member arrested for cyberstalking, threatening ICE officers

Antifa member arrested for cyberstalking, threatening ICE officers

Florida man sentenced to 48 months for tax evasion

Florida man sentenced to 48 months for tax evasion

Defendant pleads guilty to international human and drug smuggling conspiracy

Defendant pleads guilty to international human and drug smuggling conspiracy

Justice Department resolves lawsuit against Pennsylvania borough zoning code

Justice Department resolves lawsuit against Pennsylvania borough zoning code

Florida man pleads guilty to biofuel fraud conspiracy

Florida man pleads guilty to biofuel fraud conspiracy

Engstrom v. United States - Sentencing Reversed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the sentencing of Paul Engstrom in a drug case. The court found that the district court erred in its application of sentencing enhancements, requiring a resentencing. This decision impacts how certain drug offenses are sentenced within the Ninth Circuit.

Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi - Immigration Habeas Corpus

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi, addressing a habeas corpus petition related to immigration detention. The court's decision clarifies legal standards applicable to such cases.

People v. Gomez - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal has made available its opinion in the criminal case People v. Gomez, case number D086608. This update pertains to the availability of the court's decision in this specific appellate matter.

Public Guardian v. A.B. - Court Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has made an opinion available for Case A173111, Public Guardian v. A.B. This update pertains to a court proceeding and does not introduce new regulatory requirements.

Parsonage v Walmart Associates - Case D083831

This document details the case of Parsonage v Walmart Associates, case number D083831, filed in the US Courts. The filing represents a new addition to the court's docket, initiating legal proceedings.

Harris v. Muhammad - Court Opinion

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case of Harris v. Muhammad, Case No. 24-3307. This filing represents a standard procedural step in the judicial process.

Construction Laborers Pension Trust v Funko Inc - Securities Fraud Opinion

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the securities fraud case Construction Laborers Pension Trust v Funko Inc. This ruling addresses allegations of securities fraud against Funko Inc. and its officers.

Jamice Fowler v. Spring Oaks Capital SPV - Appeal

Jamice Fowler has appealed a judgment issued in favor of Spring Oaks Capital SPV. This filing represents the appellant's notice of appeal, initiating the appellate review process for the original judgment. The specific grounds for the appeal are detailed within the court documents.

Higginson v. Kia Motors America - Case Opinion

This document is a case opinion for Higginson v. Kia Motors America. The court's decision addresses specific legal arguments presented in the case. The opinion provides a judicial interpretation of relevant laws and precedents.

Guam Society of Obstetricians v. Moylan - Court Opinion

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Guam Society of Obstetricians v. Moylan. The case concerns a dispute related to medical practice and licensing in Guam. The court's decision clarifies certain legal standards applicable to healthcare providers in the territory.

Justice Department launches fund to compensate victims of investment fraud

Justice Department launches fund to compensate victims of investment fraud

DOJ opposes class action settlement for website accessibility

DOJ opposes class action settlement for website accessibility

Woman sentenced to two years for laundering over $20M

Woman sentenced to two years for laundering over $20M

Justice Department seeks to denaturalize Gurmeet Singh

Justice Department seeks to denaturalize Gurmeet Singh

Florida man sentenced to 327 months for sex trafficking

Florida man sentenced to 327 months for sex trafficking

Justice Department sues to revoke California sex offender's naturalization

Justice Department sues to revoke California sex offender's naturalization

Fuentes v. Empire Nissan - Arbitration Agreement Enforceability

The California Supreme Court is reviewing the enforceability of arbitration agreements in consumer contracts, specifically in the case of Fuentes v. Empire Nissan. This civil appeal concerns whether certain arbitration clauses are unconscionable and therefore unenforceable under state law.

Navellier et al. v. Putnam et al. - Civil Case

This document pertains to a civil case, Navellier et al. v. Putnam et al., identified by case number A172077. The filing indicates a new legal action has been initiated or is being processed within the court system.

People v. Heaps - Appellate Case Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has made available its opinion in the appellate case People v. Heaps, case number B329296. This filing makes the court's decision publicly accessible.

Tiburon LLC v. Tiburon Town - Case Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has made available its opinion in the case of Tiburon LLC v. Tiburon Town. This update pertains to a legal proceeding and does not introduce new regulatory requirements.

Justice Department publishes 3.5 million Epstein Files pages

Justice Department publishes 3.5 million Epstein Files pages

Canadian national pleads guilty to exploiting over 100 children

Canadian national pleads guilty to exploiting over 100 children

USADF official pleads guilty to accepting gratuities, lying

USADF official pleads guilty to accepting gratuities, lying

Former Google engineer convicted of AI tech espionage for PRC

Former Google engineer convicted of AI tech espionage for PRC

Atlanta return preparers enjoined, must repay $600,000

Atlanta return preparers enjoined, must repay $600,000

Wisconsin man pleads guilty to child abuse solicitation

Wisconsin man pleads guilty to child abuse solicitation

Former TD Bank employee pleads guilty to bribery, laundering $5.5 million

Former TD Bank employee pleads guilty to bribery, laundering $5.5 million

US, Bulgarian law enforcement dismantle three major EU piracy sites

US, Bulgarian law enforcement dismantle three major EU piracy sites

Tavares v. Zipcar - Case Information

This document provides case information and links to opinions for Tavares v. Zipcar, a legal case filed in the US court system. It serves as an informational update regarding ongoing litigation.

Court Modifies Published Opinion

The California Courts of Appeal have modified a previously published opinion. This modification does not alter the original judgment of the court. The update is procedural and does not introduce new legal requirements or change the outcome of the case.

Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court - Opinion Modification

The California Court of Appeal has modified its previous opinion in the case of Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court. This modification pertains to the court's prior ruling, but specific details of the changes are not provided in the document title.

Brown v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles

This document details the case of Brown v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles. It appears to be a court filing related to a dispute involving the Department of Motor Vehicles. Further details on the specific nature of the case and its resolution are not provided in the summary.

Disney Platform Distribution v. City of Santa Barbara Opinion

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of Disney Platform Distribution v. City of Santa Barbara. This ruling addresses issues related to cable franchising agreements and municipal authority over telecommunications infrastructure.

Insider trading charges, final judgment against Kevin Van de Grift

Insider trading charges, final judgment against Kevin Van de Grift

Fiedler et al. v. USA - Published Opinion

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a published opinion in the case of Fiedler et al. v. USA, case number 24-5064. This opinion clarifies legal precedent and may affect ongoing litigation involving government entities.

Kalbers v. DOJ - Opinion

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case of Kalbers v. Department of Justice on January 30, 2026. This filing represents a judicial decision on a legal matter involving the DOJ.

Kalbers v. Volkswagen AG - Ninth Circuit Opinion

The Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in Kalbers v. Volkswagen AG, Case 24-1048. This ruling addresses a specific aspect of consumer protection litigation involving the automotive manufacturer.

Knife Rights v. Bonta - Civil Rights

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed an opinion in Knife Rights v. Bonta on January 30, 2026, concerning the constitutionality of certain firearm restrictions. This ruling impacts the interpretation and enforcement of gun laws within its jurisdiction.

Halperin v. Halperin - Published Opinion

The California Courts of Appeal published an opinion in the case of Halperin v. Halperin on January 29, 2026. This publication provides a judicial interpretation and ruling on the matters presented in the case.

P. v. Aguilar - Published Opinion

The California Courts of Appeal have published an opinion in the case of P. v. Aguilar. This published opinion sets precedent for future legal proceedings within the state's judicial system. The specific details of the ruling are contained within the full opinion.

Sellers v. S.C. - Criminal Case Issues

This document pertains to the criminal case issues in Sellers v. S.C. It is a filing within the US court system, indicating ongoing legal proceedings. The specific nature of the issues addressed is not detailed in the provided content.

Justice Dept requires Columbus McKinnon to divest assets for Kito Crosby acquisition

Justice Dept requires Columbus McKinnon to divest assets for Kito Crosby acquisition