Forsthoff v Continental Casualty Company - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Forsthoff v. Continental Casualty Company, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves an insurance matter and was removed from Alameda Superior Court. The filing fee was $405.

Exelixis Inc. v. Smith - Contract Dispute

Exelixis Inc. filed a contract dispute case against Smith in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, and filed on March 4, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

Sanchez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Sanchez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Santa Clara County Superior Court, with Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC as the filing party.

McPhee v. Reinalt-Thomas Corporation - Civil Case Filing

The Reinalt-Thomas Corporation has filed a Notice of Removal in the case McPhee v. Reinalt-Thomas Corporation, case number 4:26-cv-01894, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was originally filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda.

Harrington v. Albarran - Habeas Corpus Filing

A habeas corpus petition was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in the case of Harrington v. Albarran et al. The filing, dated March 4, 2026, concerns an alien detainee and includes a filing fee of $5.00.

S.R. v. US Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case

S.R. filed a civil case against the US Bureau of Prisons on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge. The filing fee was $405.

Morfin v. Chenega Global Protection - Civil Rights Jobs Case

A civil rights jobs case, Morfin v. Chenega Global Protection, LLC et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 4, 2026. The case, bearing number 5:26-cv-01885, involves a complaint for damages.

Dillon et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al - FOIA Case

A new civil case, Dillon et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on a Freedom of Information Act request and involves plaintiffs seeking information from immigration-related government agencies.

Triumph Labs Inc. v. Kimi Crush Limited - Trademark Infringement

Triumph Labs Inc. has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Kimi Crush Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on March 4, 2026, with case number 3:26-cv-01891. Initial filings include the complaint and proposed summons.

Abrams et al v. Walgreen Co. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Abrams et al v. Walgreen Co., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 4, 2026. The defendant, Walgreen Co., filed a Notice of Removal from San Francisco County Superior Court.

Botros v. AGI Cargo, LLC et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, Botros v. AGI Cargo, LLC et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 4, 2026. The case number is 5:26-cv-01896 and is based on diversity jurisdiction with a nature of suit for Labor: Other.

Aussieker v. Bonneville International Corporation - TCPA Case Filing

A new Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) case, Aussieker v. Bonneville International Corporation, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and a certificate of interested entities.

BOTROS v. AGI CARGO, LLC et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, BOTROS v. AGI CARGO, LLC et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 4, 2026. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns labor law.

Justin v. Dish Delivering Innovation In Supportive Housing - Civil Rights

A civil rights case, Justin v. Dish Delivering Innovation In Supportive Housing, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint related to accommodations under federal question jurisdiction.

A.B. v. United States - Civil Complaint Filed

A civil case, A.B. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge. The case number is 3:26-cv-01886.

Bartone et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al - Civil Fraud Case

A new civil case, Bartone et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01897, is based on diversity jurisdiction and alleges other fraud.

Nelson v. Shutterfly, LLC - TCPA Case Filing

A new Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) case, Nelson v. Shutterfly, LLC, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves allegations related to TCPA violations.

Learmonth v. Jaguar Land Rover - Contract and Product Liability

A new civil case, Learmonth v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims related to contract and product liability, with Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC filing a Notice of Removal from Santa Clara Superior Court.

E.M. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A new civil case, E.M. v. United States of America et al, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves civil rights and names the United States as a defendant. The filing includes a complaint and a request to proceed under a pseudonym.

Dillon et al v. Van Der Hout LLP - Freedom of Information Act

A new civil case, Dillon et al v. Van Der Hout LLP, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on the Freedom of Information Act and names a law firm as the defendant.

Cole v. ByteDance, Ltd et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, Cole v. ByteDance, Ltd et al, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. A recent filing indicates the case has been transferred for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Williams v. Meta Platforms, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Williams v. Meta Platforms, Inc., was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims and has been transferred for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Virginia AG Reminds Consumers of Data Privacy Rights Under VCDPA

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones issued a reminder to consumers about their data privacy rights under the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA). The notice highlights consumer rights such as data confirmation, correction, deletion, and opt-out options for targeted advertising and data sales.

CMA Seeks Views on UK Dentistry Market

The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is seeking views from consumers and dental professionals on the dentistry market. The consultation aims to gather information to inform decisions about dental care and payment in the UK, with a deadline for submissions on March 19, 2026.

CMA Market Study Private Dental Services - Call for Evidence

The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has opened a call for evidence regarding its market study into private dental services. Dental professionals are invited to share their experiences and insights on challenges within the sector, with the evidence submission deadline set for March 19, 2026.

CMA Launches Private Dental Services Market Study

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched a market study into the supply of private dental services in the UK. The CMA is inviting views from consumers and dental professionals by April 2, 2026, on the proposed scope of the study.

CMA Private Dental Services Market Study Engagement Guidance

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched a market study into the UK's private dental services sector, focusing on market performance and potential improvements. The CMA is inviting views on the proposed scope, with a deadline for responses on April 2, 2026.

CMA Call for Evidence: Private Dental Services Consumer Experience

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has opened a call for evidence regarding consumers' experiences with private dental services in the UK. The consultation seeks views on factors influencing choices and payment methods for private treatments and closes on March 19, 2026.

CMA Market Study into Private Dentistry Sector

The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched a market study into the £8 billion private dentistry sector. The CMA is seeking views from consumers and dental professionals to assess market functioning and identify potential issues.

Ochar v. Apple Federal Credit Union - Civil Action Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Wilson Ochar's civil action against Apple Federal Credit Union and denied his motion to amend the judgment. The court also affirmed the imposition of a prefiling injunction against Ochar.

Wilson Ochar v. Ameris Bank - Appeal Dismissed in Part, Affirmed in Part

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed in part and affirmed in part the district court's order in Wilson Ochar v. Ameris Bank. The appeal regarding the dismissal of consolidated actions was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to a late filing, while the prefiling injunction was affirmed.

Brian Farabee v. Commissioner - Appeal of Habeas Corpus Petition Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Brian Farabee's appeal of a district court order that dismissed his habeas corpus petition. The dismissal was based on Farabee's failure to exhaust state court remedies, and a certificate of appealability was denied.

Johnson v. Adams - Appeal of Pretrial Detainee's Death

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of prison employees and a medical contractor in a lawsuit alleging deliberate indifference to a pretrial detainee's medical needs. The court found no genuine dispute of material fact regarding the defendants' liability for the detainee's death.

US v. Kenneth Hart - Opinion Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's resentencing of Kenneth Wayne Hart to 300 months. Hart was convicted of drug and sex trafficking offenses. The court found his arguments regarding procedural and substantive unreasonableness of the sentence to be without merit.

Crawford v. Prince George's County Schools - ADA Claim Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision granting summary judgment to Prince George's County Public Schools in a failure-to-accommodate claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court denied a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely, finding excusable neglect for an extension.

Elon Musk Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Deposition Protective Order

Elon Musk and several government entities filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals after a district court denied their motion for a protective order. The protective order sought to prevent the deposition of Musk and other high-ranking officials in a case alleging violations of the Appointments Clause and separation of powers principles.

Ochar v. Ameris Bank - Affirmation of Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order dismissing a civil action filed by Wilson Ochar against Ameris Bank and other financial institutions. The court denied the appellant's motions for amended brief, consent orders, recusal, and sanctions.

Bouvet v. Illinois Union Insurance Company - Product Liability Litigation

This document is a published court opinion from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in the matter of Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation. It details the legal arguments and decisions concerning insurance coverage disputes related to these products.

Natalie Thomas v. EOTech, LLC - Employment Law Opinion

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that private parties cannot prospectively shorten the time employees have to sue their employers under Title VII or the ADEA. The court vacated a district court's decision that enforced a 180-day limitations agreement, finding it disrupted statutory remedial schemes.

Bohatikov v. Bohatikova - Hague Convention Child Abduction

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to return two children to Wales under the Hague Convention. The court found the children's habitual residence was Wales and rejected the mother's grave risk defense. The opinion clarifies the application of the Hague Convention and International Child Abduction Remedies Act.

Covidien motion to strike denied in hernia mesh litigation

The District Court for Massachusetts denied Covidien's motion to strike a declaration from Dr. Lucian Newman III in the hernia mesh products liability litigation. The court found that the declaration was properly submitted and did not violate discovery rules or constitute a sham affidavit. This ruling pertains to MDL No. 22-md-03029-PBS.

Duarte v. Frane - Order to Show Cause for Dismissal

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts has ordered plaintiff Eric J. Duarte to show cause within 28 days why his civil action should not be dismissed for failure to complete service of process. The court noted that no proof of service has been filed, and the USMS has not received documents for this action.

FDA Warning Letter to Las Americas Supermercado#2 Inc.

The FDA issued a warning letter to Las Americas Supermercado#2 Inc. for significant violations of the Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) regulation. The inspection revealed the company failed to develop and maintain an FSVP for imported foods, a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

State AGs Announce Takedown of Multi-County Retail Theft Ring

Ten State Attorneys General, led by Florida AG James Uthmeier, announced the arrest of seven individuals involved in a large-scale organized retail theft ring. The ring targeted beauty and fragrance products across multiple Florida counties, causing tens of thousands of dollars in losses to retailers between November 2024 and summer 2025.

State v. Thomas - Withdrawal of Guilty Plea

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea in the case of State v. Thomas. The appellant pleaded guilty to charges including felonious assault and theft.

Wood v. Energex Power, Inc. - Appealability of Reconsideration Denial

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in Wood v. Energex Power, Inc., ruling that an order denying a motion for reconsideration is not a final, appealable order. The court found that the appeal was improperly filed and therefore dismissed the case.

Law Offices of Robert E. Soles, Jr., Co., LPA v. Swinderman - Civ.R. 60(B) Motion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision denying a motion to vacate a default judgment. The appellant failed to establish a meritorious defense or excusable neglect, and the court found no error in the trial court's judgment.

Court Limits Podiatrist Testimony on Spinal Cord Stimulator Necessity

The Delaware Superior Court has limited the testimony of a treating podiatrist regarding the necessity and cost of a spinal cord stimulator. The court found that while the podiatrist could testify about his treatment and recommendations, his expertise did not extend to the specific device or its cost, necessitating referral to a specialist.

Naim Fahridine v. Plume Design, Inc. - Judgment on Pleadings and Summary Judgment

The Delaware Superior Court ruled on motions for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment in the case of Naim Fahridine v. Plume Design, Inc. The court granted in part and denied in part both parties' motions concerning the retirement of a promissory note and associated tax liabilities.

Noah Sharp v. State of Delaware - Postconviction Relief Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied Noah Sharp's motion for postconviction relief and granted the motion to withdraw as counsel for Patrick J. Collins. Sharp was convicted of murder and related charges in October 2022 and sentenced to life in prison.