United States v. Dustin Newsome - Sentencing Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence of Dustin Newsome, who was convicted of child pornography offenses. Newsome was sentenced to 420 months imprisonment for inducing minors to send sexually explicit content and possessing child pornography.

Williams v. Gage - Legal Malpractice Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's decision granting summary judgment to a defendant attorney in a legal malpractice case. The plaintiff failed to designate a required expert witness within the court's established deadlines, leading to the dismissal of her claim.

Delaware Court of Chancery: Order Compelling Production of Trial Witness

The Delaware Court of Chancery ordered Summit Healthcare Operating Partnership, L.P. to produce a trial witness after the plaintiff initially declined. The court granted the defendant's motion to compel, allowing the witness to either appear in person or testify remotely within a two-week period.

AIG Specialty Insurance Co. v. Genworth Financial Inc. - Insurance Judgment Affirmance

The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a Superior Court judgment in the case of AIG Specialty Insurance Company et al. v. Genworth Financial Inc. et al. The decision upholds the lower court's rulings on summary judgment motions, concluding the appellate review of the insurance dispute.

Tanaka Trust Dispute - Summary Disposition Order

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii issued a summary disposition order in the trust dispute concerning the Raymond K. Tanaka Trust. This order addresses the appeal from the Circuit Court's final judgment regarding property ownership and Lance Tanaka's beneficial rights in the trust.

Amended order dismisses appeal for lack of jurisdiction

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii issued an amended order dismissing an appeal filed by J.M. The dismissal is due to a lack of jurisdiction, as the Family Court had not yet entered a dissolution of marriage order, rendering the appealed order not independently appealable. The court will take no further action on related orders and motions.

Supreme Court Rejects Application for Writ of Certiorari

The Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi has rejected an application for a writ of certiorari filed by William F. McKenzie and others. This decision means the lower court's ruling will stand, and the case will not be heard by the Supreme Court.

Court affirms denial of mother's motion for unsupervised visitation

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaiʻi affirmed a family court's denial of a mother's motion to modify a custody order for unsupervised visitation. The court found the mother failed to prove a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant further modification.

TBC Koloa Town, LLC v. Pizzetta, Inc. - Contempt Order Appeal

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii issued a summary disposition order on an appeal concerning a contempt order. The appeal was filed by Defendant-Appellant Catherine M. Shyne against Plaintiff-Appellee TBC Koloa Town LLC. The court reviewed Shyne's points of error regarding the contempt order and a prior order for judgment debtor examination.

Kim v. Parcel K-Tudor Hall Farm - Interpleader Finality of Judgment

The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland dismissed an appeal in Kim v. Parcel K-Tudor Hall Farm, ruling that an interpleader judgment is not final until all claimant claims are resolved. The court found the appeal premature as the circuit court had not yet completed the second step of the interpleader process.

United States v. Atoris Slater - Criminal Appeal

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. Atoris Slater (Docket No. 22-2838). The case involves a defendant appealing his sentence, which was impacted by the conversion ratios used for marijuana edibles under the Sentencing Guidelines. The court's decision may affect how drug quantities are calculated in similar cases.

Chicago Headline Club v. Kristi Noem - Court Opinion

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a preliminary injunction against federal immigration enforcement activities in Chicago. The court dismissed the appeal as moot after the plaintiffs voluntarily sought dismissal of their case due to the cessation of the enforcement operation.

Chicago Headline Club v. Kristi Noem - Civil Rights

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's preliminary injunction that regulated federal immigration enforcement in Chicago. The court dismissed the appeal after the plaintiffs voluntarily sought to dismiss their case, citing the end of 'Operation Midway Blitz'. This action removes the prior injunction against federal immigration authorities.

Campbell v. Bisignano - Social Security Civil Case

A new civil case, Campbell v. Bisignano, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves Social Security benefits and is classified under Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV. The filing includes a complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Cohen v Hakim: Admar International ownership dispute memorandum opinion

The US District Court for the District of Delaware issued a memorandum opinion in Cohen v. Hakim, concerning an ownership dispute over Admar International, Inc. The court denied a motion to remand the case to state court, allowing the federal litigation to proceed.

West River Fish Consumption Advisory

The Connecticut Department of Public Health has issued an advisory regarding fish consumption from the West River due to a fuel oil spill. Residents are urged to avoid eating fish caught in the affected area until further notice.

ICO Decision: Council incorrectly withheld FOI information

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has ruled that Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council incorrectly withheld information under FOI and EIR exemptions. The council must now reconsider the complainant's requests within 30 days.

ICO Decision: Council correct to withhold park expenditure information

The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision finding Ards and North Down Borough Council was correct to withhold certain park expenditure information under commercial confidentiality exemptions. The ICO does not require the council to take further action.

ICO Decision on DBT Information Disclosure

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision regarding the Department for Business and Trade's (DBT) handling of an information request. While DBT was largely correct in withholding information, the ICO found breaches related to exceeding response times.

ICO Decision on East Hampshire Council FOIA Complaint

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision regarding a complaint against East Hampshire Council concerning a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The ICO found the council was justified in withholding some information but had breached FOIA regulations in its initial handling of the request. No further steps are required from the council.

ICO Decision: Home Office Correct to Deny FOI Request

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has ruled that the Home Office was correct to deny an FOI request concerning Kemi Badenoch by neither confirming nor denying holding the information, citing personal data exemptions. The decision upholds the Home Office's use of Section 40(5B) of the FOIA.

ICO Decision Notice: St John's College Land Info Request

The ICO upheld a breach of regulation 14(3) of the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR) against St John's College for refusing an information request under the wrong legislation. However, the ICO found the request to be manifestly unreasonable under EIR 12(4)(b) and did not require the College to comply.

ICO Orders Lincolnshire Council to Redo FOI Searches

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has ordered Lincolnshire County Council to redo its Freedom of Information (FOI) searches for a court case. The ICO found that the council likely holds additional information relevant to the request and must issue a fresh response.

ICO Decision Notice: Health Board FOI Cost Compliance Upheld

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision notice regarding a Freedom of Information (FOI) request made to Aneurin Bevan University Health Board. The ICO found that the Health Board was justified in relying on the cost of compliance exemption (FOI 12(1)) to refuse the request and met its obligations to offer advice and assistance.

ICO Decision Notice: West Yorkshire Police Speed Camera Info Withheld

The ICO has issued a decision notice regarding West Yorkshire Police's refusal to disclose speed camera information. The Commissioner found that the police correctly applied exemptions under FOIA and that the public interest favoured withholding the information, requiring no further action from the police.

ICO Decision Notice: Ministry of Defence Nuclear Site Events Complaint

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has issued a decision notice regarding a complaint against the Ministry of Defence (MOD). While the MOD was found to have breached information rights regulations by failing to respond within statutory timeframes, the requested information regarding nuclear site events was ultimately exempt from disclosure.

ICO Decision Notice: London Borough of Hillingdon

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision notice against the London Borough of Hillingdon for failing to disclose requested information under the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR). The ICO found that the council wrongly withheld documents and breached multiple EIR regulations, including timeliness requirements.

ICO Decision on Wealden Council FOI Request

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has issued a decision notice regarding a Freedom of Information (FOI) request made to Wealden District Council. The ICO found that the Council breached FOI time limits and partially upheld the Council's reliance on exemptions for personal information and prejudice to public affairs.

ICO Rules BFI Requests Vexatious, No Further Action

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has ruled that the British Film Institute (BFI) was justified in deeming information requests vexatious under FOIA section 14(1). The ICO found no further action was required from the BFI.

ICO Decision: Lambeth Must Disclose School Redevelopment Emails

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has ruled that the London Borough of Lambeth must disclose certain emails related to a school redevelopment project. The ICO found that the Council misapplied exemptions and breached data protection regulations, ordering disclosure within 30 days.

ICO Decision Notice: FOI 10 & 16 Upheld, FOI 12(1) Not Upheld

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision notice regarding a Freedom of Information (FOI) request made to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). FOI requests 10 and 16 were upheld, while request 12(1) was not upheld. The NMC is required to provide reasonable advice and assistance to the complainant.

ICO Upholds FOI Complaint Against Hackney Council

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has upheld a Freedom of Information (FOI) complaint against Hackney Council. The Council failed to correctly interpret and respond to a request for historical business rates data, breaching FOI obligations.

ICO Decision Notice: Public Authority Failed FOI Request

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision notice against the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology for failing to respond to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request within the statutory 20-day period. The ICO requires the department to respond to the complainant within 30 calendar days.

Matadamas-Serrano v. State - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Ruben Matadamas-Serrano for first-degree murder and burglary. The court found no reversible error in the trial proceedings, including claims of Batson error, Confrontation Clause violations, and evidentiary errors.

Vegas Aqua LLC v. Jupitor Corp. - Nevada Supreme Court Civil Case

The Nevada Supreme Court vacated and remanded a district court judgment in the case of Vegas Aqua, LLC v. Jupitor Corp. The court held that a short trial judge exceeded their authority by adjudicating objections to proposed judgments and subsequent post-judgment motions.

Gill v. Gill - Child Custody Case

The Nevada Supreme Court reversed and remanded a lower court's decision that denied a father's motion for child custody and support due to a lack of jurisdiction. The court clarified the application of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) in cases involving foreign proceedings.

Care and Protection of Latifa - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion regarding the care and protection of two children, Latifa and Annette. The court affirmed a lower court's decision to terminate the mother's parental rights, finding her unfit to parent.

B-Dunz, Inc. v. Bilingual Montessori School - Business Dispute

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a lower court's judgment in the business dispute between B-Dunz, Inc. and Bilingual Montessori School of Sharon. The court upheld rulings on directed verdicts, JNOV, and a new trial, affirming the plaintiff's acceptance of a remittitur on damages.

Hull v. Ferrera - Real Property Ownership Dispute

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion in Hull v. Ferrera, concerning the ownership of a portion of Beach Avenue. The court reviewed a Land Court decision regarding real property ownership and deed construction, impacting the town's claim versus private landowners.

Commonwealth v. Levi L. - Juvenile Non-Precedential Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the denial of a juvenile's motion to suppress evidence related to firearm and ammunition charges. The juvenile had conditionally pleaded guilty after the motion to suppress was denied.

Texas Court Requires US Domicile for Chapter 15 Recognition

The US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled in In re Siu-Fung Ceramics Holdings that foreign debtors must have a US domicile, place of business, or property to qualify for Chapter 15 recognition. This decision aligns with the Second Circuit and diverges from the Eleventh Circuit's precedent.

CIT Orders Refunds of IEEPA Tariffs on Unliquidated Entries

The Court of International Trade (CIT) has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to refund tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) on unliquidated and not finally liquidated entries. This ruling benefits all importers who paid these tariffs.

COINS Act Codifies Outbound Investment Security Program

The 2025 COINS Act, signed into law on December 18, 2025, codifies the Outbound Investment Security Program (OISP). While it does not immediately alter existing regulations, it mandates substantive changes to the OISP's scope, with new Treasury Department regulations due by March 2027.

Ninth Circuit Expands Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Tech Platforms

The Ninth Circuit expanded personal jurisdiction over foreign tech companies in data breach cases in Freeman v. 3Commas Technologies OÜ. The ruling allows foreign companies with significant digital activities and knowledge of California customers to be sued in California courts, reversing a lower court's dismissal.

Importers Can Preserve Rights for IEEPA Tariff Refunds

Following a Supreme Court ruling that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize presidential tariffs, importers can take steps to preserve their rights for refunds of paid duties. The US Court of International Trade is expected to address remedies soon, and importers have options including post summary corrections, protests, or lawsuits.

Supreme Court Invalidates Tariffs Imposed Under IEEPA

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, invalidating recent "reciprocal" tariffs and fentanyl-related country measures. The decision will reshape the tariff landscape, with the Court of International Trade and U.S. Customs and Border Protection expected to establish refund procedures for duties paid.

Horizon Sustainability Law News Bulletin - February 2026

DLA Piper's February 2026 sustainability law bulletin covers legislative and policy developments. Key updates include California's CARB hearing on SB 253 and SB 261 regulations, discussing proposed fees, penalties, and potential exemptions for insurers.

ESMA Final Draft RTS on Clearing Thresholds Under EMIR 3

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its final report with draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) amending the clearing threshold regime under EMIR 3. The changes shift the focus from ETD vs OTC to uncleared OTC transactions, with revised thresholds for various derivative classes.

Mideast War Disrupts LNG Contracts and Raises Supply Security Questions

The escalating conflict in the Middle East has disrupted LNG contracts, particularly due to the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on Qatari facilities. This has led to record-high spot prices and is raising urgent questions about supply security and contractual performance for energy companies.

Supreme Court Rules IEEPA Lacks Authority for Reciprocal Tariffs

The Supreme Court ruled in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the President authority to impose reciprocal tariffs. This decision impacts an estimated $175 billion in collected tariff revenues, raising questions about potential refunds.