DOJ Appoints 42 New Immigration Judges

The Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) announced the appointment of 42 new immigration judges across 16 states. These appointments are part of an effort to reduce the immigration court backlog, which has seen over 380,000 cases resolved since January 20, 2025.

Yan v. City of Diamond Bar - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of Yan v. City of Diamond Bar. The docket number for this case is B339583. This is a standard appellate court filing.

In re M.G. - Juvenile Guardianship and ICWA Inquiry

The California Court of Appeal conditionally reversed and remanded a juvenile guardianship case concerning M.G. The court agreed with the mother that the Department of Human Services failed to conduct a proper inquiry under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The case involves challenges to denial of relative placement and ICWA compliance.

B.S. v. C.V. - Domestic Violence Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a domestic violence restraining order against C.V. C.V. appealed the trial court's decision, arguing insufficient evidence and erroneous exclusion of rebuttal evidence. The appellate court presumed sufficient evidence supported the order due to the absence of a reporter's transcript.

People v. Price - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Price. The court affirmed the judgment but remanded the matter for correction of the abstract of judgment. The opinion is not certified for publication.

People v. Ibarra - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Ibarra. The court affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County after finding no arguable error on appeal.

People v. Salinas - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 8, has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Salinas. The docket number for this case is B344478. No specific compliance actions or penalties are detailed in the provided information.

People v. Vasquez - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Vasquez. The court conducted an independent review of the record and found no arguable issues on appeal for the defendant, Javier Vasquez, who had pleaded no contest to second degree burglary and admitted to violating postrelease community supervision.

People v. Grant - Court Opinion on Penal Code Section 1202.5 Fine

The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, filed an opinion in People v. Grant on March 11, 2026. The court agreed to strike a $41 fine imposed under Penal Code section 1202.5, as the conviction was not for a theft-related offense as required by the statute.

In re A.T. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Third District, issued a non-precedential opinion in the case In re A.T. The opinion was filed on March 11, 2026, under docket number C103132. No external citations are currently known for this opinion.

In re Isaiah M. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case In re Isaiah M. The docket number for this case is E086984. This is a routine filing within the judicial system.

People v. Hoyt - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Hoyt. The case is identified by docket number A172097. No known citations or subsequent citing cases are currently available.

People v. Toca - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Toca. The docket number for this case is B336579. This filing represents a standard judicial proceeding.

People v. Itehua - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Itehua. The docket number for this case is B338674. This filing represents a new entry in the court's record.

People v. Nguyen - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Nguyen. The docket number for this case is A172536. This document represents a standard judicial filing.

People v. Costa CA3 - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of People v. Costa. The docket number is C102798. This is a non-precedential opinion.

People v. Sands - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal filed a non-precedential opinion in People v. Sands, concerning a defendant's eligibility for a youth offender parole hearing. The court affirmed the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion, citing existing case law and statutory ineligibility for those sentenced to life without parole.

In re N.R. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case In re N.R. The docket number for this case is B337391. This document represents a standard court filing.

People v. Gonzalez - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Gonzalez, docket number F088497. This document is a court filing and does not establish new regulatory requirements.

In re K.W. - Juvenile Dependency Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of In re K.W. The appeal concerns the continuation of dependency jurisdiction and family maintenance services for a minor. The court affirmed the juvenile court's order.

People v. Clarke - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal modified a judgment in the case of People v. Clarke. The court amended the judgment to reflect the dismissal of two counts (unlawful possession of ammunition by a felon and public intoxication) as agreed upon in a prior plea agreement, aligning the official record with the terms of the negotiated settlement.

Lockhart vs. Hennepin County - Tax Court Jurisdiction

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed the tax court's decision in Lockhart vs. Hennepin County, ruling that the tax court had subject matter jurisdiction over property tax assessment disputes. The court found that the taxpayer's claims fell within the scope of Minnesota Statutes section 278.01, which provides the exclusive remedy for such matters.

Minnesota Supreme Court Opinion on Civil Commitment Treatment

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision regarding the administration of involuntary intrusive treatments to civilly committed patients. The court held that the existing Price/Jarvis balancing test adequately addresses the statutory requirement for treatment necessary to preserve life or health.

CT Dept of Banking Removes Administrative Orders

The Connecticut Department of Banking has removed administrative orders for Set Forth, LLC and J. Davenport Advisors, LLC from its website. These removals indicate that the associated enforcement actions are concluded or no longer active on the public index.

Pension Fraud Alert: Impersonation Scams Rise

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has issued a fraud alert urging the UK pensions industry to enhance security measures against impersonation scams. Analysis shows a rise in fraud targeting pension savers, with approximately £500,000 lost and £2.5 million at risk between 2021 and 2025.

Brandon Lamont French v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed Brandon Lamont French's convictions for Invasion of Privacy. The court found that the State did not present sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions. This decision impacts the specific case and may set precedent for similar evidentiary challenges in Indiana.

Damon D. Clark v. First Merchants Bank - Foreclosure Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's grant of summary judgment to First Merchants Bank in a foreclosure action against Damon D. Clark. The court found that Clark waived his appeal issues by not presenting them to the trial court and that the bank established a prima facie case for foreclosure.

Roe v. United States of America - Civil Rights

A civil rights case, Roe v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint and proposed summons. The case is assigned docket number 4:26-cv-02115.

Lower Duwamish Waterway Cleanup Public Comment Periods

The Washington State Department of Ecology has opened three public comment periods related to the Lower Duwamish Waterway cleanup. These periods cover the Jorgensen Forge site, the South Park Marina site, and a new consent decree for the overall waterway cleanup, with comment periods running through April 22, 2026.

CPUC Consumer Services Supervisor Profile: Heather Dunham

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) published a profile of Heather Dunham, Consumer Services Supervisor in Los Angeles. The article highlights her role in managing consumer complaints regarding utility services and her efforts in staff training and de-escalation.

State AGs Oppose Trump Administration's No-Bond Immigration Detention Policy

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by 10 other State Attorneys General, filed an amicus brief opposing the Trump Administration's "no-bond" immigration detention policy. The brief argues the policy violates due process and federal statutes by mandating indefinite detention without bond hearings for certain non-citizens.

ICO Fines Police Scotland £66,000 for Data Mishandling

The ICO has fined Police Scotland £66,000 and issued a reprimand for serious data mishandling. Failures included excessive mobile phone data extraction and unlawful disclosure of sensitive personal information to a third party, violating UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018.

B&L Tire Service v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority - Prequalification Protest

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed and remanded a decision by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority that rescinded Noll Brothers Inc.'s prequalification status for towing services. The court found the Authority's decision was not supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Dechert v. Totowa Board of Education - Employment Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision granting summary judgment to the Totowa Board of Education in a case brought by employee Stacie Dechert. The court found the opinion non-precedential.

State of New Jersey v. Donqua Thomas - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the conviction of Donqua Thomas for first-degree murder and related weapons offenses. The court's decision, issued on March 11, 2026, upholds the jury's verdict from June 2023.

Toca Madera Scottsdale LLC v Madera Group Investments LLC - Civil Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed an order quashing a subpoena in the case of Toca Madera Scottsdale, LLC v. Madera Group Investments, LLC. The court's decision pertains to a civil dispute originating from alleged unauthorized stock transfers.

McDermott v. City of Plainfield - Civil Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's order granting summary judgment to the City of Plainfield in a civil appeal filed by Karen McDermott. The case involved an incident during an electrical inspection.

George Haffert v. Bell Tower Condominium Association Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion in George Haffert v. Bell Tower Condominium Association. The court affirmed two trial court orders but vacated and remanded one order concerning a dispute over a settlement agreement and related fees.

Law Offices of Gary S. Park, Pc v. Sung H. Jang - Appeal of Sanctions Denial

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision denying a motion for sanctions against a plaintiff. The case involves a dispute between a law firm and a former associate who left to start her own practice, leading to allegations of breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference.

New Jersey v. Hakeem Maloney - Non-Precedential Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the denial of post-conviction relief for Hakeem Maloney. The court addressed claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to expert reports and the right to testify.

In the Matter of Police Chief, Paterson - Civil Service Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court affirmed a Civil Service Commission decision denying the City of Paterson's request to convert the Police Chief title to unclassified service. The court found the City's argument misplaced based on statutory requirements for first-class cities operating under a specific form of government.

PRA Fines UK Insurance Limited £10,625,000 for Solvency II Miscalculation

The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has fined UK Insurance Limited (UKI Limited) £10,625,000 for miscalculating its Solvency II balance sheet during 2023-2024, leading to an overstatement of solvency. This is the first enforcement action where the PRA's Early Account Scheme was utilized.

SBK ART LLC v Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, even though the documents might not be discoverable from the firm's client abroad.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Concealed Carry License Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals amended its opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, a case concerning New York's concealed carry license laws. The court affirmed the dismissal of claims against a state court judge, upholding judicial immunity and federal jurisdiction requirements.

B.B. v. Hochul - Due Process Rights of Foster Children

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's decision in B.B. v. Hochul. The court found that fourteen foster children have standing to sue New York over its certification scheme for relative foster parents, which they allege violates their due process rights. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act and FCRA Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a district court decision concerning CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials under the Fair Housing Act, while also addressing a Fair Credit Reporting Act claim related to conservatorship documentation.

Care One LLC v NLRB - Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and affiliated healthcare facilities. The facilities challenged NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed due to a lack of quorum. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm, thus affirming the denial of the injunction.

Reidy Contracting Group v. Mt. Hawley Insurance - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's decision in favor of Reidy Contracting Group, LLC, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and construed an ambiguous Employers Liability Exclusion against Mt. Hawley.

Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a District Court ruling that Mar-Can Transportation Company is entitled to a $1.8 million reduction in its ERISA withdrawal liability. The court interpreted a key ERISA provision regarding the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch unions.

US v. Cardenas - Court of Appeals Decision

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent. The case is remanded for further proceedings.