In re G.M. - Court Denies Father's Motion to Modify Legal Custody

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's denial of a father's motion to modify legal custody of his child. The court found no changed circumstances to warrant modification, citing evidence of abuse predating the prior decree and the father's ongoing criminal conduct.

State v. Ward - Murder, Assault, Counsel Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Davion Ward for murder and felonious assault. The court found sufficient evidence and that the convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, also denying claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and cumulative error.

Anderson v. Jack Cleveland Casino, LLC - Summary Judgment and Statute of Limitations

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Jack Cleveland Casino, LLC. The court found that the plaintiff's complaint was filed outside the applicable two-year statute of limitations and that his status as a vexatious litigator required him to obtain leave from the court before filing.

State v. McFarland - Ohio Court of Appeals Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals ruled in State v. McFarland that a victim's right to privacy under Marsy's Law is subordinate to a defendant's right to compulsory process. The court affirmed the denial of the victim's motion to quash subpoenas for electronic device data, modifying the scope of the order.

Francis v. Cleveland Clinic Found. - Ohio Medical Negligence Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a medical negligence survivorship claim against Cleveland Clinic Foundation. The court found the claim was filed outside the statute of limitations and that the appellant's counsel failed to provide proper notice. The court also upheld the exclusion of a loss-of-chance theory.

Fugo v. Rae - Breach of Contract Case Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Fugo v. Rae, a breach of contract case. The court found that the trial court's award of $1,200 was not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and the defendant's appeal was dismissed due to lack of a cross-appeal.

Kittis v. Cleveland Clinic Found. - Medical Malpractice Opinion Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a jury verdict in favor of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in a medical malpractice case. The court found that the trial court did not err in denying motions for a new trial or mistrial, and any potential error in introducing new causation theories was harmless.

Kurtz v. Indus. Comm. - TTD Compensation Termination

The Ohio Court of Appeals ruled that while temporary total disability (TTD) compensation can terminate upon reaching maximum medical improvement (MMI), the Industrial Commission abused its discretion in ordering recoupment of overpayments. The court granted a limited writ of mandamus and remanded the case for further proceedings.

State of Delaware v. Bryan Azofeifa-Ramirez - Interlocutory Appeal Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied Bryan Azofeifa-Ramirez's application for an interlocutory appeal. The court found that the Delaware Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals in criminal cases, meaning only final judgments can be reviewed.

Delaware Superior Court Denies Motion to Modify Sentence

The Delaware Superior Court denied Kendall Smith's pro se motion to modify his sentence. The court found the motion to be repetitive and procedurally barred under Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b), as per previous denials.

Delaware Superior Court Denies Motion to Modify Sentence

The Delaware Superior Court denied Michael J. Ford's motion to modify his sentence. The court found the motion to be repetitive under Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) and therefore could not consider its merits. The defendant's original sentence involved a period of work release.

Brown v. Delaware - Motion to Modify Sentence Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied JaiaYre Brown's motion to modify her sentence. The court found the motion to be repetitive under Rule 35(b) and therefore could not consider its merits. The defendant had pleaded guilty to Carrying a Concealed Deadly Weapon and Possession of Ammunition by a Person Prohibited.

EU Commission Merger Approval: DigitalBridge / TCGL / County Broadband / Freedom Fibre / Truespeed

The European Commission has approved the proposed concentration involving DigitalBridge, TCGL, County Broadband, Freedom Fibre, and Truespeed. The decision, made under Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, signifies non-opposition to the merger.

£121 Million Funding for Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition

Innovate UK, part of UK Research and Innovation, is offering up to £121 million in grant funding for the Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition 7. The funding is available for UK registered organisations collaborating on innovative clean maritime technologies, with applications opening on March 11, 2026, and closing on July 15, 2026.

EPSRC Prosperity Partnerships 2027 Funding Opportunity

The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) has announced a £40 million funding opportunity for Prosperity Partnerships in 2027. Applications open on March 12, 2026, and close on May 21, 2026. This funding aims to support collaborative research programmes between established businesses and academic partners to foster long-term prosperity in the UK.

Funding for European Social Survey National Coordinator

The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) has announced a funding opportunity for a UK National Coordinator for the European Social Survey (ESS) Rounds 13 and 14. The total fund available is £2.31 million, with applications closing on May 21, 2026.

Gopstein v. Vad - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a lower court's decision denying, in part, a motion for summary judgment in the case of Gopstein v. Vad. The court found that the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact regarding whether the defendant deviated from the standard of care in treating a spinal injury.

People v. Martin - Criminal Conviction Affirmed

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed the conviction of Michael Martin for attempted assault in the first degree and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. The court found no violation of speedy trial rights and deemed any evidentiary errors harmless.

People v. Streeks - NY Appellate Division Opinion

The New York Appellate Division affirmed a judgment convicting Paul Streeks of manslaughter in the first degree. The court found that Streeks' appeal of his sentence was foreclosed by his waiver of the right to appeal as part of his plea agreement.

People v. Jimenez-Rivera - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued an opinion in People v. Jimenez-Rivera on March 12, 2026. The court found that the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid due to overbroad language in the written waiver and deficiencies in the oral colloquy.

People v. Tyreek M. - Criminal Appeal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a judgment against Tyreek M. The court granted the defendant's counsel's application to withdraw, finding no non-frivolous points for appeal. The decision was issued on March 12, 2026.

People v. Morales - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York modified a judgment against Leuris Morales. The court struck the condition of probation requiring payment of surcharges and fees, finding it unrelated to rehabilitation.

People v. Leigh - Appellate Division Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York issued an opinion in People v. Leigh, concerning a defendant's guilty plea to attempted sexual misconduct and criminal contempt. The court addressed whether the defendant was adequately informed of potential fines beyond mandatory surcharges and fees.

Youngs v. Woods - Prison Disciplinary Rule Violation

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York dismissed a petition challenging a prison disciplinary finding. The court found the matter moot as the determination was administratively reversed, expunged from the record, and the surcharge refunded.

Lexington Ins. Co. v. New York Mar. & Gen. Ins. Co. - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York reversed a lower court's decision, finding that New York Marine and General Insurance Company owes further coverage obligations to Lexington Insurance Company. The case involves a dispute over insurance coverage following a tour bus accident and subsequent settlement.

Miller v. State of New York - Judicial Mandatory Retirement Age

The New York Appellate Division ruled on the constitutionality of mandatory judicial retirement ages following the state's Equal Rights Amendment. The court affirmed that existing mandatory retirement laws for judges remain in effect, despite the amendment's inclusion of age as a protected category.

Matter of Hurckes - Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued a legal opinion regarding attorney Michael Alexander Hurckes. The court is considering reciprocal discipline based on an emergency suspension order from the Supreme Court of Florida due to findings of great public harm. The Attorney Grievance Committee seeks to impose reciprocal interim suspension or other appropriate discipline.

Anonymous v. Anonymous - Family Law Appeal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's order requiring a plaintiff to pay all of his children's educational expenses and awarding the defendant $40,000 in counsel fees. The court also affirmed a subsequent finding of contempt against the plaintiff for failing to comply with the prior order.

People v. Cedeno - Criminal Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued a court opinion in the case of People v. Cedeno. The opinion was published on March 12, 2026, under citation 2026 NY Slip Op 01411.

New Empire Bldr. Corp. v. Onboard Hospitality LLC - Appellate Decision

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed an order denying a motion to strike a defendant's answer and impose discovery sanctions. The court found that while the defendant was slow to respond to discovery, the plaintiff also lacked diligence in prosecuting the action.

Gray v. Nassau Life Ins. Co. - Insurance Proceeds Dispute

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss a case against Nassau Life Insurance Company. The dismissal was based on a prior action pending in federal court concerning the same insurance proceeds.

Avison Young LLC v. 459 W 50 ST LLC - Breach of Contract

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a lower court's judgment against 459 W 50 ST LLC and 182 Stanton LLC, ordering them to pay Avison Young LLC $454,000 in unpaid commissions. The dispute centered on the interpretation of a tiered commission structure for the sale of four properties.

Josey v. New York City Dept. of Fin. - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York reviewed a lower court's decision regarding a speed camera violation. The court confirmed the determination of the New York City Department of Finance Parking Violations Bureau, denying the petition to annul the $50 penalty.

People v. Vella - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a judgment convicting Dylan K. Vella of murder in the second degree and other crimes. The defendant appealed the sentence, but his appeal waiver foreclosed review of the sentence's severity.

Walgreen Co. v. Walgreen Co. - Notice of Removal

Walgreen Co. filed a notice of removal on March 12, 2026, to transfer a civil case from Alameda County Superior Court to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, originally filed in state court under case number 26CV166820, is now assigned federal case number 3:26-cv-02193.

FCA: Second Charge Mortgage Firms Need Higher Standards

The FCA has issued a notice to second charge mortgage firms highlighting weaknesses in advice, affordability assessments, and fee transparency. The regulator is calling for firms to raise standards to protect consumers, particularly those consolidating debt, and will continue to monitor the market.

Concept Capital Group placed into administration

The UK's High Court has placed Concept Capital Group (CCG) into administration on March 9, 2026, following FCA proceedings over an alleged unauthorised investment scheme. CCG collected approximately £23m from investors. The FCA's proceedings against other defendants will continue.

Rabid Raccoon Found in Chesapeake; Public Health Advisory Issued

The Virginia Department of Health issued a notice regarding a rabid raccoon discovered in Chesapeake, Virginia. This notice serves as a public health advisory, reminding residents of rabies prevention measures and the legal requirement for pet vaccinations.

Steel v. State - Criminal Appeals Opinion

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a judgment and sentence for John Anthony Steel, who was convicted of a lewd or indecent proposal to a child under 16. The court found sufficient evidence to support the conviction, upholding the maximum sentence of ten years imprisonment.

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Revises Rule 1.7

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has revised Rule 1.7 to update the correct and current address for the Clerk of the Court. This amendment, effective March 9, 2026, ensures communications are directed to the appropriate physical and mailing addresses.

NIH Notice: Expiration of PAR-25-326 Ultra-Rare Gene Therapy Network Access

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) issued a notice announcing the immediate expiration of Funding Opportunity Announcement PAR-25-326 for Ultra-Rare Gene-based Therapy (URGenT) Network Resource Access. No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

United States v. Gregory Kilgore, III - Sixth Circuit Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Gregory Kilgore III's motions to suppress incriminating statements and evidence. Kilgore appealed after pleading guilty to drug and gun crimes.

Scot Gaither v. Tim Lane - Sixth Circuit Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of Scot Gaither's federal habeas petition. The court found that Gaither waived his right to counsel on direct appeal and procedurally defaulted on his claim of ineffective trial counsel. The opinion was filed on March 12, 2026.

United States v. Wydell Dixon - Appeal of Felon in Possession Conviction

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision regarding Wydell Dixon's sentence reduction motion. Dixon, convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, sought a reduction based on an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines, but his sentence was upheld.

Arateco-Munoz v. Bondi - Immigration Appeals

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Diego Arateco-Munoz v. Pamela Bondi. The petitioner sought review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order affirming the denial of his application for post-conclusion voluntary departure, arguing his convictions for driving while intoxicated were improperly considered.

Shepler's Inc. v. City of Mackinac Island - Ferry Regulation Dispute

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's injunction in a dispute between ferry companies and the City of Mackinac Island. The court allowed the City to regulate ferry rates and other aspects of transportation but not parking.

United States v. Elijah Chappell - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Elijah Chappell for unlawful possession of a firearm. The court found no error in the trial proceedings, conviction, or sentence of 120 months imprisonment.

Pamela Lowrance v. CoreCivic, Inc. - Sixth Circuit Non-Precedential Opinion

The Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of a lawsuit against CoreCivic, Inc. and others regarding the alleged inadequate medical care of an incarcerated individual. The court found no federal claim was stated and declined supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims.

Michael Shaut v. CIR - Tax Court Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a Tax Court decision sustaining an income tax deficiency determination against Michael Shaut. The case involved deductions claimed for business expenses, theft loss, and net operating losses related to the fallout from the fraud prosecution of Downing Investment Partners' officers.

United States v. Claibon Burrus - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Claibon Burrus's motion to vacate and motions to suppress. Burrus was sentenced to 260 months for drug and firearm offenses. The court found probable cause for search warrants related to an investigation into a drug overdose death.