Admiral Insurance Company v. Lippert Components - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Admiral Insurance Company v. Lippert Components, Inc. The lawsuit concerns competing claims for declaratory relief regarding Admiral's duty to defend its insureds against an underlying personal injury lawsuit.

Keandre Foley v. State of Texas - Failure to Stop & Render Aid

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Keandre Foley for failing to stop and render aid. Foley was sentenced to 12 years in prison for the second-degree felony.

Cleve Wells v. Dustin Lee Chestnut - Landlord & Tenant Case Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) has dismissed the appeal in Cleve Wells v. Dustin Lee Chestnut, case number 10-25-00454-CV. The dismissal is for want of prosecution and failure to follow a directive of the Clerk of the Court.

Mizell v. Coggins - Protective Order Appeal Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, has dismissed the appeal in Kristina Mizell v. Terri Anne Coggins. The dismissal is due to the appellant's failure to file a required docketing statement by the court-imposed deadlines. This action pertains to a protective order case.

Swisher v. State of Texas - Writ of Mandamus/Prohibition

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, has dismissed an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Bryan Lacy Swisher. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case, as such jurisdiction rests with the Court of Criminal Appeals or lower courts.

Benson v. State of Texas - Criminal Appeal Dismissal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, has dismissed the criminal appeal of Akylon Kyle Benson. The dismissal is based on the trial court's certification indicating the defendant had no right of appeal following a plea bargain. The court issued its opinion on March 12, 2026.

Milton Coster Hill v. State of Texas - Sex Offense Case

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, issued an opinion affirming a conviction in the case of Milton Coster Hill v. The State of Texas. The court addressed issues including the denial of a motion to recuse the trial judge, alleged judicial bias, and constitutional challenges to a sex offense statute. The disposition was affirmed.

Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion in Matter of Leoffler Trust

The Colorado Court of Appeals reversed a district court's dismissal of a petition concerning the Leoffler Trust. The court remanded the case, directing further proceedings to determine the petitioner's standing as a beneficiary.

Crook v. ICAO - Unemployment Benefits Case

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a decision by the Industrial Claim Appeals Office denying unemployment benefits to Brenda Crook. The denial was based on a finding of disqualification due to theft. The court found substantial evidence supported the Panel's decision.

Peo v. Thiam - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Abou Thiam for attempt to influence a public servant and forgery. The court found no error in the trial court's handling of jury challenges. The opinion is designated as non-precedential.

Peo v. Devoe - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Frank Adam Devoe. The court found sufficient evidence to support his conviction as a special offender and upheld the trial court's sentencing decisions.

Peo v. Spector - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of People v. Spector. The defendant appealed the denial of a motion to continue his sentencing hearing, which sought additional time for appointed counsel to investigate withdrawing a guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The appellate court found no abuse of discretion by the district court.

Peo v. Hernandez - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in Peo v. Hernandez, affirming a district court's order dismissing criminal charges against Ashley Hernandez. The case involved allegations of witness intimidation and judicial recusal.

Williams v. CDOC - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a pro se inmate's complaint against the Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC) and a prison warden. The inmate alleged violations of CDOC regulations and his due process rights. The court found the complaint failed to establish a quasi-judicial action reviewable by the district court.

Garcia v. Auto Nation North - Appeal of Contract Dispute

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of Auto Nation North in a case filed by Roy Garcia. Garcia's appeal concerned his attempt to purchase a vehicle using a non-negotiable instrument, which Auto Nation refused to accept.

Peo v. Ciarcia - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order denying a postconviction motion filed by Jerry Gerard Ciarcia. The motion concerned his sentencing for sexual assault convictions. The court's decision addresses the application of continuing course of conduct statutes to sentencing.

Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion: Peo v. Duran

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Louis Pete Duran for sexual assault on a child. The court rejected Duran's arguments regarding the withdrawal of his counsel, the definition of reasonable doubt, and the use of a face mask by a witness.

Weatherill v. State Farm - Insurance Disclosure Statute of Limitations

The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled in Weatherill v. State Farm that claims under the insurance disclosure statute (C.R.S. § 10-3-1117) are subject to a two-year statute of limitations, not one year, and accrue upon discovery of the insurer's noncompliance. The court reversed a lower court's decision, remanding the case with directions.

Marriage of Herzik - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's order awarding maintenance in a dissolution of marriage case. The court also remanded the case for a determination of appellate attorney fees. The opinion is designated as non-precedential.

Barba v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office - Workers' Compensation

The Colorado Court of Appeals addressed a novel issue regarding employers' final admissions of liability in workers' compensation cases. The court interpreted a statute concerning medical impairment benefits, clarifying that employers cannot limit maintenance medical benefits to specific treatments.

Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion - In re A.R.

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a probate court's order authorizing the involuntary administration of medications to an individual deemed incompetent to proceed in a criminal case. The court found the order was necessary due to the individual's severe schizoaffective disorder and deteriorating physical condition.

Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion on Dependency and Neglect Case

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment terminating the parent-child legal relationships for two children. The case involved allegations of parental drug use, unsafe living conditions, and failure to comply with a treatment plan.

People v. Thiam - Probation Revocation Appeal

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders revoking Abou Thiam's probation in three separate cases. The revocation was based on new criminal charges, positive drug tests, and failure to comply with counseling and payment requirements.

Montgomery v. Best Buy Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's dismissal of William Montgomery's claims against Best Buy Stores L.P. and Iron Spear Protection Group LLC. The appeals court remanded the case with directions to reinstate the complaint, finding the dismissal for failure to file returns of service was premature.

Peo v. Barrientos - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision regarding a postconviction motion filed by Enrique Augustin Barrientos. The appeal concerned claims of ineffective assistance of plea counsel following a guilty plea to sexual assault on a child.

Russell v. Dept of Local Affairs - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a State Personnel Board decision denying a discretionary hearing to Ebony Russell, an employee of the Department of Local Affairs. The case involved Russell's concerns about contractor bonding and insurance for housing projects funded by state and federal sources.

Emery v. Khumo Developments - Forcible Entry and Detainer Action

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment in a forcible entry and detainer action, ruling in favor of Khumo Developments LLC. The court found that Kendal R. Emery unlawfully detained the property after a foreclosure sale. The opinion addresses Emery's procedural arguments on appeal.

CMA assessing Aldi/Lidl for Large Grocery Retailer designation

The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is assessing whether Aldi and Lidl meet the criteria to be designated as Large Grocery Retailers under the Groceries Market Investigation (Controlled Land) Order 2010. The CMA has launched an Invitation to Comment, which closes on April 13, 2026.

FDA Guidance on Medical Devices for Weight Loss

The FDA has issued guidance for medical devices intended for weight loss, outlining recommendations for non-clinical testing and clinical study design to support premarket submissions. This guidance aims to promote consistency and facilitate efficient review of submissions for devices related to weight loss, reduction, management, or obesity treatment.

City of Milton v. Chang - Municipal Liability for Road Defects

The Georgia Supreme Court vacated lower court decisions in a lawsuit against the City of Milton, ruling that municipal immunity is not waived for road defect claims unless the defect is within the portion of the street intended for travel. The case involved a $32.5 million award to the parents of a man killed in a vehicle accident.

Gines v. State - Murder Conviction Appeal

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the murder convictions and sentences for Jamel Kweisi Gines, Dontravious Mahone, and Michael Jamar Dawson. The convictions stem from a 2016 shooting death, and the appeals addressed numerous claims of error following a December 2018 trial. The court denied motions for new trial and upheld the jury's verdicts.

Georgia Supreme Court: Municipal Liability for Street Negligence

The Georgia Supreme Court clarified municipal liability for street negligence, vacating and remanding a $35 million judgment against the City of Milton. The court ruled that OCGA § 32-4-93(a) does not waive immunity for road defect claims, which must rely on OCGA § 36-33-1(b) if a ministerial duty is implicated.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Fee Schedules for FY 2026

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published a proposed rule to establish fee schedules and fee recovery for fiscal year 2026. This proposal is open for public comment until April 13, 2026.

L. v. United States of America - Civil Case

A new civil case, L. v. United States of America et al., was filed on March 12, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the U.S. Government as a defendant and is categorized under 'P.I.: Other' nature of suit.

Misiph v. 360° Painting - Expert Testimony Ruling

The District of Massachusetts issued an order on motions in limine regarding expert testimony in the case of Misiph v. 360° Painting. The court ruled on the admissibility of expert evidence presented by both plaintiffs and defendants.

FDA Warning Letter to thesnuslife.com for Nicotine Pouches

The FDA issued a warning letter to thesnuslife.com for selling nicotine pouch products to individuals under 21, deeming them misbranded. The company is required to take prompt action to address violations and ensure compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

FDA Warning Letter to Rio Verde Food Service Inc.

The FDA issued a warning letter to Rio Verde Food Service Inc. on February 27, 2026, citing serious violations of the seafood Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) regulation following an inspection in July 2025. The company's HACCP plan for Live Oysters was found to be inadequate in controlling critical limits for temperature during receiving and storage, and its corrective action plans were insufficient.

State AG Urges PURA to Reject Aquarion Sale

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong urged the Public Utility Regulatory Authority (PURA) to reject the sale of Aquarion Company. The AG cited concerns that the sale would double household water bills, gut consumer protections, and end public oversight, despite PURA's preliminary approval.

Court Denies Motion to Review Pretrial Bond Revocation

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals denied Justin Lloyd's motion to review the trial court's order revoking his pretrial bond. The court found that the defendant's motion was adequate for review but upheld the trial court's decision under an abuse of discretion standard.

State ex rel. Fought v. Industrial Commission of Ohio - Mandamus

The Ohio Court of Appeals denied a writ of mandamus sought by Jason B. Fought, upholding the Industrial Commission's denial of his permanent total disability compensation application. The court found sufficient evidence supported the commission's findings regarding vocational potential and consideration of psychological and physical conditions.

Fields-Arnold v. Cent. State Univ. Bd. of Trustees - Employment Discrimination

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the Court of Claims' decision to grant summary judgment to Central State University Board of Trustees. The appellant failed to satisfy her burden on claims of sex discrimination and FMLA retaliation, waived her hostile work environment claim, and inadequately briefed her race discrimination claim.

State v. Schaumleffel - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in State v. Schaumleffel, ruling that the defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel. The court found that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to withdraw filed by the defendant's attorney.

State v. Shirilla - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's dismissal of a postconviction relief petition filed by Mackenzie Shirilla. The dismissal was based on untimeliness, as the petition was filed on the 366th day after the filing of trial transcripts, exceeding the statutory 365-day deadline.

State v. Jackson - Felony Sentence Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a felony sentence for Jalen Jackson, ruling that the sentence was not reviewable on appeal because the trial court imposed a base sentence within the range agreed upon by the parties in the plea agreement. The opinion addresses R.C. 2953.08 regarding reviewability of sentences.

Carrington Mtge. Servs. v. Israel - Foreclosure Judgment Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision granting summary judgment against a defendant in a foreclosure action and default judgment against an unknown spouse. The court found the defendant failed to present defenses and that a pro se litigant must comply with civil procedure rules.

Jasko v. Sirna Constr., Inc. - Default Judgment Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal concerning a default judgment, ruling that the denial of a motion to vacate was not a final appealable order. The court found the original default judgment was not final due to multiple defendants and missing Civ.R. 54(B) language, and subsequent dismissal for failure to prosecute dissolved interlocutory orders.

State v. Watson - Ohio Court of Appeals Sentencing Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and vacated the sentencing of Brandon Watson, remanding the case for resentencing. The court found procedural errors in how consecutive sentences were imposed, violating state rules and statutes regarding sentencing procedures and courses of conduct.

In re J.R.P. - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a father's motion to terminate shared parenting and reduce his parenting time. The court found the juvenile court did not err in reviewing best-interest factors and did not abuse its discretion.

State v. Galindez - Affirmation of Rape Conviction

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Angelo M. Galindez for sex offenses against a child under ten. The court found no ineffective assistance of counsel and that the convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Goldshtein v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Officer - Abuse of Discretion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision, finding no abuse of discretion in upholding the Cuyahoga County Board of Revision's assessment of property value. The appellant failed to establish sufficient evidence that the board's decision was in error.