Order denying Eric Holmes' post-conviction relief motion

The Delaware Superior Court denied Eric Holmes' motion for post-conviction relief. Holmes was convicted of Possession of a Firearm by a Person Prohibited and sentenced as a habitual offender. This order addresses his latest attempt to challenge his conviction.

Order denying reconsideration in Lane v. Healthcare Services Group

The Delaware Superior Court denied a motion for reconsideration in the case of Lane v. Healthcare Services Group. The plaintiff sought reconsideration of an order denying her motion to compel the production of a child abuse report related to her employment termination case.

CLX Logistics LLC v Chase Corporation - Order on Motions to Dismiss

The Delaware Superior Court issued an order addressing motions to dismiss in a breach of contract dispute between CLX Logistics LLC and Chase Corporation. The court's decision pertains to the interpretation of termination and dispute resolution clauses within the parties' Master Transportation Services Agreement.

Andino v. Nexius Solutions - Opinion and Order on Motions in Limine

The Delaware Superior Court issued an Opinion and Order ruling on Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine in the wrongful death case Andino v. Nexius Solutions. The court addressed arguments regarding the admissibility of evidence concerning the negligence of Velex, the employer of the decedents.

Berry v. Commonwealth - Resentencing and Psychiatric Examination

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a lower court's decision allowing a reciprocal court-ordered psychiatric examination of a defendant seeking resentencing. The defendant had presented expert testimony regarding his mental condition, prompting the Commonwealth's request for its own expert evaluation.

Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. - Assisted Living Security Deposit Statute

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. that community fees charged by assisted living residences (ALRs) can be considered lawful if they correspond to ALR-specific intake services. This decision clarifies the application of the security deposit statute to ALRs.

Yarahmadi v. Noem et al - Other Immigration Actions

A new civil case, Yarahmadi v. Noem et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 5:26-cv-02238, is categorized under 'Other Immigration Actions' and was filed on March 13, 2026.

MRC Research Grant Funding Opportunity

The Medical Research Council (MRC) is opening a new applicant-led research grant funding opportunity on April 7, 2026. Funding ranges from £400k to £3.1m, with grants typically covering up to 80% of full economic cost. The opportunity is open to eligible research organisations in the UK.

MRC Partnership Grant Funding Opportunity

The Medical Research Council (MRC) has announced a new partnership grant funding opportunity, opening on April 7, 2026. This grant aims to support collaborative activities between research teams, encouraging interdisciplinarity. Eligibility is restricted to UK-based research organizations and researchers.

Clean Maritime Technology Funding Opportunity

Innovate UK and the Department for Transport are offering up to £121 million in grants for innovative clean maritime technologies. UK registered organisations in collaboration can apply for funding, with the application window closing on July 15, 2026.

FCA bans Kasim Garipoglu from UK financial services

The FCA has banned Kasim Garipoglu from working in UK financial services due to a lack of honesty and integrity. Garipoglu demonstrated a disregard for regulatory requirements, undermined AML controls, and provided false information to regulators.

Liverpool Waste Investigation: Second Arrest, HGV and Excavator Seized

The Environment Agency, Joint Unit for Waste Crime, and Merseyside Police have made a second arrest in an investigation into suspected illegal waste dumping in Liverpool. An HGV and an excavator have been seized as part of the ongoing operation.

Virginia Health District Confirms Three Rabid Animals

The Central Virginia Health District confirmed three rabid animals (one raccoon, two skunks) between March 6-9, 2026, with potential contact with dogs. The notice reminds residents of Virginia's rabies vaccination laws for pets and advises on avoiding wild animals.

State v. Horn - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals filed an opinion in State v. Horn on March 12, 2026. The court affirmed the conviction of Michael Anthony Horn for failure to respond to an officer's signal to stop, rejecting his arguments regarding identification testimony and ineffective assistance of counsel.

State v. Rodriguez - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences of Enrique Rey Rodriguez for aggravated burglary and theft. The court found no merit in Rodriguez's arguments regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and inaccuracies in his presentence investigation report.

Glenn Whiting v. City of Athens, Tenn. - Legal Opinion and Sanctions

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a legal opinion in Glenn Whiting v. City of Athens, Tenn., addressing misconduct by the plaintiff's attorneys. The court imposed sanctions on attorneys Van Irion and Russ Egli for misrepresenting the record, citing non-existent cases, and misstating case law in their briefing.

United States v. Austin David Stafford - Sixth Circuit Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision in United States v. Austin David Stafford, upholding his convictions for producing child pornography. The court rejected Stafford's arguments regarding the factual basis for his guilty pleas and the district court's jurisdiction.

United States v. John Lohden, Jr. - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences of Dayton Peterson and John Lohden, Jr. The defendants were convicted of kidnapping, robbery, and impersonating an officer, with sentences of 30 and 39 years respectively. The court rejected their numerous arguments on appeal.

EMCO Corp. v. Armor Machine & Mfg. Ltd. - Contract Dispute

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of EMCO Corp. v. Armor Machine & Mfg. Ltd. The court addressed a contract dispute concerning the purchase of a custom machine, focusing on delivery delays and contract cancellation. The ruling affirmed the district court's findings.

Glenn Whiting v. City of Athens, Tenn. - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of motions to recuse and the grant of sanctions against Glenn Whiting and his attorney in a case involving lawsuits stemming from the City of Athens, Tennessee's annual fireworks show. The court found no abuse of discretion in the lower court's rulings.

United States v. Kevin Willie Carter - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's sentencing of Kevin Willie Carter. The court found no error in the application of two Guidelines enhancements for leadership role and maintaining a premises for drug trafficking, upholding Carter's 264-month sentence.

United States v. Terrell Lamar Williams - Sixth Circuit Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision to revoke Terrell Lamar Williams' supervised release and sentence him to 30 months imprisonment. Williams committed fraud and violated terms of his release by faking drug tests and driving with a suspended license.

Doe v. Diocese of Covington - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision granting summary judgment to the Diocese of Covington in a case alleging inadequate response to racial harassment. The court found no violation of federal or state law based on the facts presented.

SEC v. Elanco Animal Health Inc. - Proposed Plan of Distribution

The SEC has issued a notice regarding a proposed plan of distribution for $15 million in civil penalties collected from Elanco Animal Health Inc. Elanco was fined for misleading revenue statements made between Q1 2019 and Q1 2020. The public has 30 days to comment on the distribution plan.

SEC v. Vanguard Group - Administrative Proceeding and Settlement

The SEC has issued a second extension order in the administrative proceeding against Vanguard Group, Inc. The Division of Enforcement has requested an extension until July 31, 2026, to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution for a Fair Fund totaling $146.4 million, stemming from Vanguard's settlement of misleading statements regarding tax consequences to investors.

SEC Approves Amended Distribution Plan for Compass Minerals Disclosure Violations

The SEC has approved an amended distribution plan for Compass Minerals International, Inc. following disclosure violations. The amendment corrects a scrivener's error in the plan of allocation, ensuring fair distribution of the Fair Fund to harmed investors.

Export Licence Transmission Issue Resolved

The Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU) has confirmed that a transmission issue affecting export licences to the Customs Declaration Service (CDS) has been resolved. Normal declarations can now resume.

Seventh Circuit Court Opinion on Sterigenics LLC Insurance Dispute

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the Sterigenics LLC v. National Union Fire Insurance Company case. The court certified a question of Illinois law regarding pollution exclusions in insurance policies to the Illinois Supreme Court, which has now provided an answer resolving the dispute.

Peterson v. Collins - Due Process in VA Physician Removal

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision upholding the removal of Dr. John Peterson from his position at the Veterans Administration. The court found that Peterson received adequate due process during the disciplinary proceedings.

Levian et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Levian et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, assigned number 3:26-cv-02236, was filed on March 13, 2026, with a filing fee of $405. The nature of the suit is listed as P.I.: Other under Diversity jurisdiction.

Wright v. Dicampli - Summary Judgment Motion Ruling

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware issued a summary judgment motion ruling in Wright v. Dicampli. The court addressed claims of prisoner Franklin Wright against correctional officers regarding alleged Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment violations. The ruling focuses on the defendants' motion for summary judgment.

Court of Chancery dismisses case with prejudice, denies fee-shifting

The Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed the case GGH-RE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LIMITED v. GOLUB CEE INVESTORS, LLC with prejudice. The court granted the respondent's motion to dismiss for failure to retain substitute counsel and failure to prosecute, and denied the request for fee-shifting.

Kentucky Court of Appeals Opinion Affirming and Remanding

The Kentucky Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming and remanding a contempt finding and sanction against N.L. and B.L. The case involves the Cabinet for Health and Family Services and minor children, with multiple docket numbers cited.

Kentucky Court of Appeals - Dismissal of Appeal

The Kentucky Court of Appeals issued an Opinion and Order dismissing an appeal filed by E.L.B., Jr. The court found the case moot, relating to child custody and the constitutionality of a state statute. The dismissal pertains to docket numbers 2025-CA-0831 and 2025-CA-0892.

Keith Rose v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Criminal Case Appeal

The Kentucky Court of Appeals reviewed a conviction for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest. The court reversed the disorderly conduct conviction due to insufficient evidence and improper jury instructions but affirmed the conviction for resisting arrest.

Kharboutli v. Four Seasons Solar Products - Reversing and Remanding

The Kentucky Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's dismissal of Four Seasons Solar Products, LLC in a case brought by Majed Kharboutli. The court found that the trial court erred in dismissing the case under CR 12.02(f), indicating further proceedings are necessary.

Kentucky Court of Appeals Opinion Affirming Case 2025-CA-0080

The Kentucky Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming a lower court's decision in case 2025-CA-0080. The case involves dependency, neglect, or abuse proceedings initiated by the Cabinet for Health and Family Services regarding minor children. The appellate court upheld the trial court's findings.

Martin v. Jones - Kentucky Court Affirms Non-Precedential Opinion

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Martin v. Jones, upholding the interpretation of Trust and Transfer on Death (TOD) documents. The court found no error in the lower court's ruling regarding the distribution of Single Investment Accounts.

Regina & Associates v. Finance Cabinet - Affirming Bid Protest Denial

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision upholding the denial of bid protests by the Finance and Administration Cabinet. The case involved the interpretation of Kentucky's Model Procurement Code regarding competitive sealed bidding and best value awards for state contracts.

Great Point, LLC v. Austin Wilkerson - Court Opinion Affirming

The Court of Appeals of Kentucky issued an opinion affirming a lower court's decision in Great Point, LLC v. Austin Wilkerson. The case involved a dispute over a "conditional approval" of a "retail coffee shop with drive-through" development plan by the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Planning Commission.

Arizona Court Opinion on Parental Rights

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision regarding parental rights termination. The court found that while abandonment grounds were proven, terminating the father's rights was not in the child's best interest. The decision is non-precedential.

State v. Friedel - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential decision in State v. Friedel, docket number 1 CA-CR 25-0289 PRPC. The court granted review of the petitioner's request for post-conviction relief but ultimately denied the relief sought.

Arizona Appeals Court Opinion on Parental Rights Case

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to terminate parental rights for two children. The father appealed, arguing insufficient diligent effort was made for reunification services. The court found that reunification services were provided and that the termination was appropriate.

Stephen Stoute v. Joseph Aoun - Breach of Contract Appeal

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a breach of contract and discrimination lawsuit filed by Stephen Stoute against Northeastern University and its trustees. The plaintiff appealed after the Superior Court dismissed the case, including claims related to admission to the university's college of engineering.

Stanley Webb v. George Leontire - Legal Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential summary decision in Stanley Webb v. George Leontire. The court affirmed a lower court judgment, allowing cross-examination on criminal matters and upholding the defendant's earned fee.

Commonwealth v. Jean P. Durand - Criminal Assault and Battery Appeal

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a conviction for assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon causing serious bodily injury. The court found sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction despite the defendant's claim of not being criminally responsible due to mental illness.

Agnitti v. Philip Morris USA Inc. - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion in Agnitti v. Philip Morris USA Inc., affirming a jury verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed jury instructions related to claims of negligence, product defect, fraud, and violations of the Consumer Protection Act.

Commonwealth v. Greg McCollum - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court vacated judgments against Greg McCollum for operating under the influence (OUI) and negligent operation of a motor vehicle. The court found the verdicts and subsequent offense finding to be in error and set them aside.

Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion on Marcie's Care

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a Juvenile Court judgment that found parents unfit and granted permanent custody of a child to the Department of Children and Families (DCF). The decision addresses parental unfitness due to housing, educational, and medical neglect, as well as substance use and mental health issues.

Colorado Bankruptcy Court Opinion on Homestead Exemption

The US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado issued an opinion regarding a Chapter 7 Trustee's objection to a debtor's claim of homestead exemption. The case involves the debtors' assertion of a homestead exemption over two adjacent properties, one with a single-family home and the other with a manufactured home occupied by their adult son.