Stearns et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Stearns et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al, was filed on March 13, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a class action complaint based on diversity jurisdiction and nature of suit for contract, with defendants including Meta Platforms, Inc. and Luxottica of America, Inc.

Clemons v. Equifax Information Services LLC - Consumer Credit

A new civil case, Clemons v. Equifax Information Services LLC, was filed on March 13, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on Federal Question jurisdiction and concerns consumer credit.

Roe v. United States - Civil Rights Case Filing

A new civil rights case, Roe v. United States, was filed on March 13, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the Federal Bureau of Prisons as the defendant and is categorized under Civil Rights. The filing fee was $405.

Calamia v. Experian Information Solutions - Consumer Credit Case

A new federal consumer credit case, Calamia v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., was filed on March 13, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves allegations related to consumer credit reporting.

Roe CL 287 v. Uber Technologies - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, Roe CL 287 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 13, 2026. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims against Uber Technologies. The initial filings include a complaint and proposed summons.

JLG 267 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, JLG 267 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed on March 13, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC. The filing fee was $405.

Jane Doe NLG v. Uber Technologies Inc - Personal Injury

A civil case has been filed against Uber Technologies Inc. by Jane Doe NLG in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by number 3:26-cv-02222, was filed on March 13, 2026, with a basis in Diversity and a nature of suit for Personal Injury: Other.

Roe v. United States of America - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, Roe v. United States of America, was filed on March 13, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the Federal Bureau of Prisons as the defendant. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and a motion to maintain anonymity.

Roe v. United States - Civil Rights Case Filing

A new civil rights case, Roe v. United States, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the Federal Bureau of Prisons and is based on civil rights claims. The filing date was March 13, 2026.

Heilman v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. - Civil Complaint

A civil complaint was filed on March 13, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 4:26-cv-02224, initiating a lawsuit by Naomi Heilman against Abercrombie & Fitch Co. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves a personal injury claim.

Pennsylvania Superior Court Adoption Case T.R.S., Appeal of S.L.N.

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a lower court's decree terminating the parental rights of S.L.N. to her child, T.R.S. The court also granted the mother's counsel's application to withdraw, finding the appeal to be without merit.

Com. v. Yost - Pennsylvania Superior Court Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Carrie Lynn Yost. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County.

Com. v. Marfisi, E. - Criminal Case Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision affirming the judgment of sentence for Estalin Marfisi. The appeal challenged the consolidation of cases, admission of evidence, denial of a mistrial, and sentencing aspects.

Com. v. Ostad Sadeghe - PCRA Appeal Dismissed

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the dismissal of a PCRA petition filed by Mohammad Ostad Sadeghe. The court found the petition to be untimely and lacking an exception to the statutory time bar, upholding the lower court's decision.

Pennsylvania Superior Court Opinion on K.B. Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the termination of parental rights for R.B. concerning his son K.B. The court also dismissed the appeal regarding the change in the child's permanency goal to adoption.

Herrmann v. Herrmann - Child Custody Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a lower court's custody order granting sole legal and physical custody to the mother. The father appealed, arguing the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). The court found the appeal to be non-precedential.

Com. v. Olivencia, G. - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Gabriel Omar Olivencia. The court affirmed Olivencia's convictions for simple assault and vacated in part his judgment of sentence for other offenses.

Com. v. Covert, J. - Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has issued a non-precedential court opinion in the case of Com. v. Covert, J. The case is identified by docket number 608 MDA 2025. No known citations or subsequent legal actions are currently associated with this opinion.

Com. v. Myers, E. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion in the criminal appeal of Eric Myers. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence entered by the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.

Pennsylvania Superior Court Opinion on Parental Rights Termination

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed orders terminating the parental rights of K.H. and E.H. to their two minor daughters. The appeals concerned orders entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, which granted petitions from the Allegheny County Office of Children, Youth and Families (CYF). The termination was based on concerns including substance abuse, homelessness, and neglect.

Brown v. Kudranski - Child Custody and School Choice Dispute

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in Brown v. Kudranski, addressing a child custody dispute concerning school choice. The court affirmed an order directing the child to attend school in the father's district.

Commonwealth v. Clary, D. - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the denial of Daniel Khalil Clary's petition for post-conviction relief. The appeal stems from a 2017 incident where Clary was convicted of attempted murder of law enforcement officers and other charges.

Com. v. Ross, W. - Pennsylvania Superior Court Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. Ross, W. The case is identified by docket number 2035 EDA 2025. This opinion does not appear to cite any other authorities or be cited by any other cases.

Commonwealth v. Deas - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Corey Deas, who pleaded guilty to retail theft. The court granted the appellant's counsel's petition to withdraw.

Commonwealth v. D.S. - Criminal Appeal Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential combined opinion by Judge Lazarus in the case of Commonwealth v. D.S. The appeal concerns a judgment of sentence entered following convictions for indecent assault of a minor and endangering the welfare of a child. The court affirmed the judgment.

Potts v. Potts - Custody Dispute Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Potts v. Potts, concerning a custody dispute. The court affirmed the lower court's order granting primary physical custody of the minor children to the mother. The appeal was filed by the father.

Com. v. Bryte, C. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Chanze Stephen Bryte. Bryte was convicted of possession of a firearm prohibited and sentenced to six to twelve years of incarceration.

T.C. v. G.R.C. v. M.N.G. - Custody Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a combined opinion affirming a lower court's order granting primary physical and sole legal custody to the mother and permitting her relocation. The appeal was filed by the maternal grandmother.

Robinson v. Singleton - Child Support Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a combined opinion in Robinson v. Singleton, concerning a child support appeal. The court remanded the case with instructions, noting procedural issues with the trial court's order and opinion.

Com. v. Alexander, L. - Appeal Quashed

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania quashed an appeal filed by Louis E. Alexander. The court found that Alexander was appealing a non-final order, specifically the denial of his motion to disqualify the PCRA court judge. The appeal was dismissed as premature.

Evans Resources, L.P. v. Petroplex Energy, Inc. - Contract Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's summary judgment in favor of Petroplex Energy, Inc. and the Anwars in a contract dispute with Evans Resources, L.P. The court found that Evans Resources, L.P. take nothing from the Anwars.

Dylan Scott Reynolds v. State of Texas - Injury to Child Case Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, has dismissed the appeal in Dylan Scott Reynolds v. The State of Texas. The appellant, found guilty of injury to an elderly individual, voluntarily moved to dismiss his own appeal.

Aashaud McVea v. State of Texas - Murder Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, filed an opinion affirming the conviction of Aashaud McVea for murder. The court addressed six issues raised by the appellant concerning self-defense, jury instructions, evidence admission, and closing arguments.

CMA Consumer Forum Meeting Notes Published

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published the meeting notes from its Consumer Forum held on 10 February 2026. These notes document discussions aimed at ensuring consumer perspectives are integrated into the CMA's ongoing work.

CMA Consumer Forum Terms of Reference Published

The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published the terms of reference for its Consumer Forum. This forum brings together the CMA and UK consumer representative organisations to ensure consumer perspectives are central to the CMA's work.

Candace Lanette Sneed Reinstated to Practice Law

The Supreme Court of Georgia has ordered the reinstatement of Candace Lanette Sneed to the practice of law in the state. This decision follows the Court's review of a compliance notice submitted by the State Bar of Georgia, confirming that Ms. Sneed has met the conditions for reinstatement.

Clemons v. Chex Systems, Inc. - New Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Clemons v. Chex Systems, Inc., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by docket number 4:26-cv-02240, was filed on March 13, 2026, with a basis in Federal Question and concerning Consumer Credit.

NJ Scrap Tire Act Privacy Concerns

New Jersey's Scrap Tire Act, effective January 20, 2026, mandates electronic tracking of scrap tires, potentially conflicting with existing privacy laws. Businesses face criminal liability if tracking violates employee privacy statutes, creating a compliance paradox.

V8 in Chrome Vulnerable to Code Execution

CISA has added a vulnerability in Google Chrome's V8 engine to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. The vulnerability (CVE-2026-3910) allows remote code execution and requires federal agencies to patch by March 13, 2026.

Google Chrome Skia Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

CISA has added a known exploited vulnerability, CVE-2026-3909, affecting Google Chrome versions prior to 146.0.7680.75. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to perform out-of-bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. Agencies are directed to apply mitigations by March 13, 2026.

State AGs Sue to Block Trump Administration Tariffs

Ten State Attorneys General, led by Connecticut AG William Tong, have joined a motion to block the Trump Administration's recent tariffs. The states argue the tariffs are illegal under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 and seek a court order to halt their implementation, citing potential economic harm and increased costs for consumers and businesses.

Living Lands, LLC v. Harold Ward - Environmental Law Appeal

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision in Living Lands, LLC v. Harold Ward, dismissing claims related to West Virginia's environmental reclamation activities. The court found that the plaintiffs' claims were barred by claim preclusion or failed to state a claim under the Clean Water Act.

NAACP v. SC Juvenile Justice - Rehearing En Banc Granted

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted a rehearing en banc in the case of NAACP v. SC Juvenile Justice. Parties are required to file additional copies of their briefs within 10 days, and the case is tentatively scheduled for oral argument.

Sheldon v. Allergan Sales - False Claims Act

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a False Claims Act case involving Allergan Sales, LLC. The decision clarifies the scienter requirement for liability under the Act, impacting how drug manufacturers report rebates and discounts to government programs like Medicaid.

Bolick v. Anderson - Eighth Amendment Conditions of Confinement

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed, vacated, and remanded Bolick v. Anderson. The court found that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim regarding inhumane conditions of confinement against Kirkland officials, but agreed the Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections could not be held liable.

State v. Roper - Enforcement of Settlement Agreement

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's decision to enforce a settlement agreement in a debt collection case. The court found that the agreed-upon terms were clear and constituted a valid contract, affirming the judgment against the appellant. The original debt was for $10,199.02.

State v. Wang - Plea Validity and Sentencing

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the validity of a guilty plea in State v. Wang but reversed the imposition of post-release control at sentencing. The court found the trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C) regarding the plea.

State v. Street - Theft and Receiving Stolen Property Convictions

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment convicting Joshua Street of theft and receiving stolen property. The court found no plain error in failing to merge the convictions, as the later use of the stolen credit card caused separate harm.

IRS Internal Revenue Bulletin 2026-12

The IRS published Internal Revenue Bulletin 2026-12, including Notice 2026-17 and Rev. Proc. 2026-11. Notice 2026-17 announces forthcoming proposed regulations on section 987 foreign currency gain or loss, and Rev. Proc. 2026-11 provides specifications for substitute employment tax forms.

Trump Tariffs Impact on US Households and Trade

A Tax Foundation analysis estimates that new tariffs imposed under Section 122 will increase taxes per US household by $600 in 2026. This follows a Supreme Court ruling that limited the scope of previous tariffs imposed under IEEPA, reducing the average applied tariff rate.