Global Ampersand LLC v. Bank of America - Civil Case

Global Ampersand LLC has filed a civil lawsuit against Bank of America, N.A., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by docket number 3:26-cv-01534, was filed on February 20, 2026, and involves a notice of removal from a state court case. TD Bank, N.A. also filed a notice of removal and a certificate of interested entities.

Yee v. Snap, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Yee v. Snap, Inc., was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-01528, was filed under diversity jurisdiction with a nature of suit described as P.I.: Other.

Last Brand Inc. v. Deckers Outdoor Corporation - Antitrust Case Filing

Last Brand, Inc. has filed an antitrust case against Deckers Outdoor Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01540, was filed on February 20, 2026, with the initial complaint and related documents submitted.

Corbett v. Meta Platforms, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A civil case, Corbett v. Meta Platforms, Inc., was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. The filing includes a complaint and a demand for a jury trial.

Hemstalk v. Skywest Airlines, Inc - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Hemstalk v. Skywest Airlines, Inc., was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint seeks damages against Skywest Airlines, Inc. The filing fee was $405.

Sigurdson v. Curbsure, LLC - TCPA Complaint Filed

A complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by Karen Sigurdson against Curbsure, LLC, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The case, Case Number 5:26-cv-01537, was filed on February 20, 2026, initiating litigation under federal question jurisdiction.

Marichalar v. SSA Commissioner - Social Security Case

A civil case, Marichalar v. SSA Commissioner, was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a claim related to Social Security benefits (DIWC/DIWW).

Brannon v. Mountain View Police Department - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, Brannon v. Mountain View Police Department, was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against the Mountain View Police Department. A case management conference is scheduled for May 19, 2026.

Fresno et al v. Noem et al - Civil Rights Case

The City of Fresno and other municipalities have filed a civil rights case against Governor Kristi Noem. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against the US government, citing violations of the Administrative Procedure Act.

JLG 263 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, JLG 263 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01526, involves a complaint against Uber Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC.

Ramos Bernabe v. Noem et al - Immigration Case Filing

A new civil case, Ramos Bernabe v. Noem et al, was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and includes a petition for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Complaint Under the APA.

Machado v. Mental Health Association - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, Machado v. Mental Health Association of San Mateo County et al., was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint filed by Jordan Machado against the County of San Mateo, the Housing Authority of The County of San Mateo, and the Mental Health Association of San Mateo County.

JLG 262 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Civil Suit

JLG 262 has filed a civil suit against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC. The case, filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns personal injury. The filing fee was $405.

Zhaolu v. Transportation Security Administration - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case has been filed by Zhang Zhaolu against the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, based on federal question jurisdiction, was filed on February 20, 2026.

J.C.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Product Liability

J.C.01 has filed a product liability lawsuit against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, Case Number 3:26-cv-01520, was filed on February 20, 2026. The complaint alleges product liability related to personal injury.

Sanchez et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Sanchez et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al, was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from a state court action, with National Railroad Passenger Corporation dba Amtrak as a filing party.

T. v. United States of America - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case has been filed against the United States of America, specifically naming the Federal Bureau of Prisons as a defendant. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-01516, was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Allegheny County Employees Retirement System v Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated - Securities Case

A securities class action lawsuit has been filed by Allegheny County Employees Retirement System against Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated and its executives. The case, filed on February 20, 2026, alleges violations related to securities trading.

Zhu v. Pinterest, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Zhu v. Pinterest, Inc., was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01529, was filed by Ken Zhu against Pinterest, Inc. and involves a complaint and proposed summons.

JLG 261 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Civil Suit

JLG 261 has filed a civil suit against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC. The case, filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns personal injury. The initial filings include a complaint, certificate of interested entities, notice of filing, and proposed summons.

Essintial Enterprise Solutions LLC v. SBA - PPP Loan Forgiveness

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's decision, ruling that payments to independent contractors do not qualify as "payroll costs" for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan forgiveness. This decision impacts how businesses that utilized PPP loans can claim forgiveness.

Abramowski v. Nuvei Corp - Court rejects tendered shares

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a lower court's decision dismissing a lawsuit by shareholders who claimed Nuvei Corp. violated the SEC's Best Price Rule by rejecting their tendered shares. The court found the Best Price Rule is silent on whether tender offerors can enforce restrictions on tendered shares.

Knieling v. Fook - Maritime Injury Appeal

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Knieling v. Fook, ruling that an injured seaman cannot recover future medical expenses if it is unclear what future treatments she may receive. The court upheld the award for past medical expenses and pain and suffering but denied future claims pending further clarity.

Defense Distributed v. NJ Attorney General - 3D-Printed Ghost Guns & First Amendment

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that purely functional computer code, such as that used to 3D-print firearms, may not be protected by the First Amendment. The court affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New Jersey's prohibition on distributing such digital files to unlicensed individuals.

DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Stevens - Foreclosure Appeal

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in a foreclosure case involving DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and the heirs of Carlton Stevens. The court found that the heirs forfeited their affirmative defenses by failing to raise them in response to a summary judgment motion.

Parker v. Spanberger - Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Ray Elbert Parker against state and federal officials. The court found it lacked jurisdiction because the order Parker sought to appeal was neither a final nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, and Parker consented to the dismissal of his claims.

Kyeem King v. State of Maryland - Affirmation of District Court Order

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and dismissed in part the appeal of Kyeem King. The court affirmed the district court's denial of King's motion for bail or release and dismissed the remainder of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This unpublished opinion does not set precedent.

Winslow v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Civil Action Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order dismissing a civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying a motion for injunctive relief. The unpublished opinion noted that such opinions are not binding precedent.

Nawal Ali v. BC Architects Engineers, PLC - Employment Discrimination Appeal

The Fourth Circuit reversed a district court's decision to sanction Nawal Ali's counsel for approximately $57,000 in an employment discrimination lawsuit. The appellate court found that the district court abused its discretion in imposing sanctions, concluding that the counsel did not unreasonably multiply proceedings.

US v. Michael Brandon - Criminal Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. The court found that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applied, even if the initial traffic stop lacked reasonable suspicion.

State AGs and State Attorney Sign Agreement to Combat Human Trafficking

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier and State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to combat human trafficking in South Florida. The agreement establishes a partnership between the Office of Statewide Prosecution and the State Attorney's Human Trafficking Task Force, allocating $1.5 million in operational funds.

Romanian national pleads guilty to selling network access, $250k loss

Romanian national pleads guilty to selling network access, $250k loss

Former NFL player convicted in $328M genetic testing fraud

Former NFL player convicted in $328M genetic testing fraud

Coal executive convicted of bribery, money laundering, wire fraud

Coal executive convicted of bribery, money laundering, wire fraud

Six defendants charged in international ATM jackpotting scheme

Six defendants charged in international ATM jackpotting scheme

Eleven gang members indicted on racketeering, murder, drug charges

Eleven gang members indicted on racketeering, murder, drug charges

Engineer sentenced for 15-year kickback scheme, fraud

Engineer sentenced for 15-year kickback scheme, fraud

California DFPI Enforcement Actions Summary - January 2026

The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) issued a summary of enforcement and non-enforcement actions taken in January 2026. These actions include citations, desist and refrain orders, consent orders, and accusations related to violations of financial laws, including mortgage lending and securities regulations.

New York Encourages RSV Vaccination Amidst High Cases

The New York State Department of Health is strongly encouraging eligible residents to get vaccinated against RSV due to persistently high case numbers and hospitalizations. The notice highlights the availability of vaccines and monoclonal antibodies for various age groups and risk factors, emphasizing their effectiveness in preventing severe illness.

Florida Tornado Emergency Declaration Renewal

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has renewed the state of emergency for North Florida due to tornado damage. Executive Order 26-34 extends Executive Order 24-94 for sixty days, continuing state support for recovery efforts in affected counties.

ESMA Supervisory Briefing on AAR Representativeness Obligation

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a supervisory briefing clarifying expectations for counterparties regarding the active account requirement (AAR) representativeness obligation. The briefing provides guidance on identifying relevant subcategories, reporting trades, and includes an example of compliance.

Delaware Supreme Court Reverses Breach of Contract Dismissal

The Delaware Supreme Court reversed a lower court's dismissal of breach of contract claims filed by insurers against Blackbaud, Inc. The insurers, acting as subrogees and assignees, alleged Blackbaud failed to protect client data after a ransomware attack. The court found the amended complaints adequately pled a breach of contract claim.

Bardy Diagnostics v. iRhythm Technologies - Patent Infringement Lawsuit

The District Court of Delaware issued a memorandum resolving disputed claim constructions in a patent infringement lawsuit between Bardy Diagnostics and iRhythm Technologies. The court held a Markman hearing on January 15, 2026, to interpret claim terms across eight asserted patents involved in the dispute.

SpecialtyCare v. Cigna Healthcare - Motion to Dismiss Recommendation

A US District Court has recommended granting Cigna Healthcare's motion to dismiss a complaint filed by SpecialtyCare, Inc. and affiliated physician groups. The lawsuit concerned Cigna's alleged failure to pay over $1.3 million in arbitration awards related to the No Surprises Act. The court found the plaintiffs' claims were not properly before it.

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi - Rehearing En Banc Ordered

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered a rehearing en banc for the case Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi. This action vacates the previous panel's order and indicates a significant reconsideration of the case's legal issues. The court's decision to rehear the case en banc suggests potential implications for immigration law and appellate procedure.

USA v. Alex Ruiz - Criminal Conviction Affirmed

The Ninth Circuit affirmed Alex Ruiz's conviction for transporting illegal aliens. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of a prior conviction for the same crime under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) and that Ruiz's constitutional arguments were forfeited.

Ratha v. Rubicon Resources LLC - Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act Retroactivity

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court's denial of a motion for relief from summary judgment in a human trafficking case. The court held that an amendment to the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, clarifying civil liability for attempted benefit from human trafficking, has retroactive effect.

Competition Bureau Expands Real Estate Commission Rules Investigation

The Competition Bureau has expanded its investigation into real estate commission rules to include Greater Vancouver REALTORS® (GVR), seeking a court order to gather information. The probe examines whether GVR and the Canadian Real Estate Association's commission rules violate the Competition Act by potentially discouraging competition or leading to higher costs for buyers and sellers.

California AG Reviews Warner Bros. Mergers for Antitrust Concerns

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has issued a statement reviewing proposed mergers involving Warner Bros., Paramount, and Netflix for potential antitrust concerns. The review focuses on market concentration, competition, worker impact, and creative diversity within the media and entertainment industry.

US Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled President Trump's imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) illegal. California Attorney General Rob Bonta celebrated the decision, which is expected to restore order to markets and potentially lead to the return of funds to harmed parties. The tariffs were projected to cost California's economy $25 billion and over 64,000 jobs.