NYSDOL Opens New Lower Manhattan Career Center

The New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) has opened a new Lower Manhattan Career Center. The center will provide job seekers with career assistance, workshops, resume help, and training programs, while also supporting local businesses in building a skilled workforce.

Presidential Message on Alexander Graham Bell's Legacy

The White House issued a presidential message honoring Alexander Graham Bell on his birthday, celebrating his legacy in communication and innovation. The message reaffirms the administration's commitment to advancing next-generation technologies and securing technological dominance.

Presidential Message on Women's History Month

The White House issued a presidential message celebrating American women's achievements for Women's History Month. The message highlights historical and contemporary female figures and reaffirms the administration's commitment to policies that support women and families.

Court affirms arbitration award for NetApp on employee labor law claims

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's decision to confirm an arbitration award in favor of NetApp, Inc. The employee, Alexander Sorokuno, had sued NetApp for alleged labor law violations and sought civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act. The court found that the arbitration award conclusively determined the employee's lack of standing for his PAGA claim.

Johnson v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal Affirmed

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in Ivan Thomas Johnson v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 3, 2026, with docket number 6D2024-1341. The disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Craig Demonte Griffin v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Ruling

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed a ruling in the case of Craig Demonte Griffin v. State of Florida. The case, with docket number 5D2025-1880, involved an appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. The disposition of the appeal was an affirmation of the lower court's decision.

Curtis L. Duhart v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Curtis L. Duhart v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 5D2025-3143, concerned a criminal matter. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Donald Ray Willett, Jr. v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Donald Ray Willett, Jr. v. State of Florida. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed', indicating no change to the original ruling.

Bryan Pike v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower tribunal's ruling in Bryan Pike v. State of Florida. The case, with docket number 6D2023-2252, involved an appeal from a lower tribunal case number 2009-CF-744. The disposition of the appeal was 'Affirmed'.

Mills v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Mills v. State of Florida. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed,' indicating no change to the original ruling. The case involves a criminal appeal.

Arif M. Khan and Anila Arif v. Chelsea Oaks at Lake Saunders Homeowners Association, Inc. - Appellate Court Opinion

The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida issued an opinion in the case of Arif M. Khan and Anila Arif v. Chelsea Oaks at Lake Saunders Homeowners Association, Inc. The court affirmed the lower court's decision. The docket number for this case is 5D2024-3267.

Gary Baker v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Opinion

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in Gary Baker v. State of Florida. The case, identified by docket number 6D2023-2427, involved an appeal by Gary Baker against the State of Florida. The court's disposition was a final affirmation of the prior ruling.

Delaney v. State of Florida - Appellate Affirmance

The First District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in Delaney v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its disposition on March 3, 2026, with no further details on the specific legal arguments or outcomes provided in this summary.

Laws v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in the case of Frank L. Laws v. State of Florida. The appeal was filed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The disposition of the case was affirmed.

Davidson v. Adams - Florida District Court of Appeal Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in Davidson v. Adams, Estate of Casimir Adams. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 3, 2026, with docket number 1D2024-1663.

Dorsey Jr. v. State of Florida - Appellate Court Opinion

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Dorsey Jr. v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 3, 2026, with docket number 1D2025-0642.

C.E.T., III v. State of Florida - Appellate Case Affirmation

The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in C.E.T., III v. State of Florida. The case, bearing docket number 6D2024-0358, involved an appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County. The disposition of the appeal was an affirmation of the lower court's ruling.

Frank v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Caisy A. Frank v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 5D2024-0388, concerned a criminal matter from Flagler County. The court's disposition was an affirmation of the original ruling.

Duckworth v. Cornwell - Florida District Court of Appeal Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Margaret Duckworth v. William C. Cornwell and True Vine Landscaping. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 3, 2026, with docket number 5D2024-3394.

Jessie Joseph v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in the case of Jessie Joseph v. State of Florida and Ricky Dixon, Secretary of the Department of Corrections. The appeal concerned a lower tribunal case with docket number 24-563CA.

Lane v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal Affirmance

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Lane v. State of Florida. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed' for docket number 1D2025-0711. This ruling pertains to a criminal appeal.

Neil Guy Callahan v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Neil Guy Callahan v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 6D2024-0092, was decided on March 3, 2026, with the disposition being 'Affirmed'.

Kovar Law Group v. Hoyt, Tower Hill Select Insurance Co. - Appeal Decision

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Kovar Law Group v. Hoyt, Tower Hill Select Insurance Co. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed' with no further details provided in this summary document.

Menezes v Pachigalla - Appellate Court Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Menezes v. Pachigalla. The opinion, issued on March 3, 2026, pertains to case number 5D2024-2915.

Lesters Painting v. Peraza - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an opinion in the case of Lesters Painting, Llc, Respondent v. Carl Peraza And Susan Peraza, Appellants. The opinion was filed on November 4, 2025, and pertains to an appeal from the Clark Superior Court.

Erin Peters v. Holly Kenner - Court Opinion

The Washington State Court of Appeals Division III filed an opinion in the case of Erin Peters v. Holly Kenner on March 3, 2026. The opinion is related to an appeal from the Adams Superior Court, with a judgment date of July 26, 2024.

State v. Jung Jung, Jr - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Jung Jung, Jr. The opinion, filed on March 3, 2026, relates to an appeal from Pierce County Superior Court. This is an unpublished opinion and should not be cited.

State v. Deborah K. Blackburn - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Deborah K. Blackburn. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, and pertains to an appeal from Grays Harbor County Superior Court.

Guardianship Of B.r. And I.r. - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II filed an unpublished opinion in the case Guardianship Of B.r. And I.r. The case involves an appeal from a Grays Harbor County Superior Court judgment or order. The opinion was authored by Judge Bernard Veljacic.

State v. Swecker - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division III has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Nicholas A. Swecker, with docket number 40365-3. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, and concerns an appeal from the Spokane Superior Court.

P.s.c., Inc. v. Purdys Public House, Llc - Appeal Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has filed an opinion in the case P.s.c., Inc. v. Purdys Public House, Llc, Et Al. The case involves an appeal from a Pierce County Superior Court judgment. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026.

State v. Stewart-Toliver - Criminal Appeal Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division III has filed an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Martel L. Stewart-Toliver. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, under docket number 40518-4. This filing represents the court's decision on the appeal.

Estate of Carol M. Carey - Estate Law

The Washington Court of Appeals Division III has issued an opinion in the matter of the Estate of Carol M. Carey. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, under docket number 40344-1, stemming from an appeal from Benton Superior Court.

State v. Ross - Criminal Appeal

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Ross, with a file date of March 3, 2026. This is an unpublished opinion and should not be cited per GR 14.1(a). The case involves an appeal from Pierce County Superior Court.

Jason Robert Garcia v. State of Washington - Personal Restraint Petition

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an unpublished opinion regarding a Personal Restraint Petition filed by Jason Robert Garcia. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, and pertains to a case originating from Pierce County Superior Court.

State of Washington v. Gary Brandon Ault - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington State Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Gary Brandon Ault. The opinion was authored by Judge Robert Lawrence-Berrey and filed on March 3, 2026. This document represents the court's final decision on the matter.

Apartment Management Consultants Llc v. State Dept. Of Revenue - Tax Dispute

The Washington Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Apartment Management Consultants Llc v. State Dept. Of Revenue. The court's decision addresses a tax dispute, with the file date for the opinion being November 12, 2025.

Chicago Title Insurance v State Revenue - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Chicago Title Insurance v. State Revenue. The case involves an appeal from a Thurston Superior Court judgment, with the file date for the opinion being March 3, 2026.

MHRA Field Safety Notices - February 23-27, 2026

The MHRA has published a list of five Field Safety Notices (FSNs) issued between February 23-27, 2026, for medical devices. These notices are for informational purposes, and recipients are advised to contact the manufacturer with any questions.

Ninth Circuit Opinion on Corporate Authority and Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion concerning corporate authority and jurisdiction in a bankruptcy case involving Parks Diversified, L.P. The opinion addresses appeals related to the debtor and various holding companies and individuals. The case consolidates multiple appeals concerning these issues.

Ninth Circuit: Bankruptcy Petition Without Corporate Authority Not Jurisdictional

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a bankruptcy petition filed without proper corporate authority is not a jurisdictional defect. This decision clarifies the requirements for filing bankruptcy and impacts how courts handle such cases. The ruling addresses appeals related to bankruptcy proceedings involving Parks Diversified, L.P.

Ninth Circuit: Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Upheld Despite Lack of Corporate Authority

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld bankruptcy court jurisdiction in a case involving Parks Diversified, L.P., despite questions regarding corporate authority. The ruling clarifies jurisdictional boundaries in complex bankruptcy proceedings.

Parks Diversified, L.P. v. Forsythe - Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Appeal

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the bankruptcy case of In re: Parks Diversified, L.P. v. Forsythe. The appeal concerns issues of bankruptcy jurisdiction, corporate authority, and judicial efficiency. The court's decision addresses the scope of bankruptcy court powers and the procedural handling of complex corporate bankruptcies.

Ninth Circuit: Bankruptcy Court Retains Jurisdiction Despite Unauthorized Petition

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a bankruptcy court retained jurisdiction over a case despite the filing of an unauthorized petition. This decision clarifies jurisdictional boundaries in bankruptcy proceedings involving complex corporate structures and multiple related entities.

Ninth Circuit Opinion: Bankruptcy Jurisdiction and Corporate Authority

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion regarding subject-matter jurisdiction and corporate authority in a bankruptcy case involving Parks Diversified, L.P. The court addressed multiple appeals related to the dismissal of certain claims and the scope of corporate authority in bankruptcy proceedings.

Pinilla Perez v. Bondi - Noncitizen Removal Proceedings Deadline

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals granted a petition challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings. The court found the BIA provided insufficient reasons for denying equitable tolling of the 90-day deadline for filing such motions.

US v. Cardenas - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's state of mind, potentially impacting his defense.

Lanesborough 2000 LLC v. Nextres LLC - Court Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided Lanesborough 2000 LLC v. Nextres LLC, affirming in part and vacating in part a district court's judgment on an arbitration award. The court found the contractual waiver of the right to appeal ambiguous and remanded the case for further proceedings regarding an injunction of a state-court action.

Broadcast Music v. North American Concert Promoters - Antitrust Licensing Fees

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the district court imposed unreasonable rates and an expanded definition of gross revenues, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Care One LLC v. NLRB - Court Opinion on Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and its affiliates. The healthcare facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was unlawfully appointed and protected from removal. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm.