Bezkorovayniy et al v. Edlow - Civil Immigration Case

A new civil immigration case, Bezkorovayniy et al v. Edlow, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on March 2, 2026, with case number 5:26-cv-01798, and involves 'Other Immigration Actions'.

Rubin et al v. County of Santa Clara California et al - Civil Rights

A new civil rights case, Rubin et al v. County of Santa Clara California et al, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges violations related to civil rights and seeks damages against the County of Santa Clara and its departments.

V.L. v. United States of America - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Case Number 3:26-cv-01796, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiff, V.L., is suing the United States of America, including the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity.

R.M. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, R.M. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01795. Initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

In Re Ishmael Jackson v. the State of Texas - Mandamus

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, denied Ishmael Jackson's petition for writ of mandamus. The court found that the record provided was insufficient to establish the right to relief, citing deficiencies in meeting the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Jennifer Nutt v. Justin Blackburn - Contract Case Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, has dismissed the contract case Jennifer Nutt and 3CPL Holdings, LLC v. Justin Blackburn, et al. The dismissal was granted upon the appellants' motion. The case involved contract disputes and was docketed under number 03-26-00047-CV.

Assadi v. Batoei - Contract Case Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) dismissed the case Assadi v. Batoei for want of jurisdiction. The court found the appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, as the motion for new trial was not filed within the prescribed thirty-day period after the judgment.

Langston B. Williams Jr. v. Rex Bowers - Contract Suit

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment ordering specific performance of real estate contracts. The appellants argued the contract suit was barred by limitations and that specific performance was improperly awarded. The court found no error in the lower court's decision.

Richard Avina v. Evergreen Estates - Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, has dismissed the case of Richard Avina v. Evergreen Estates for want of prosecution. The dismissal follows the appellant's failure to file a required brief by the court-ordered deadline.

Stephen Kenneth King v. State of Texas - Habeas Corpus Denied

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, denied Stephen Kenneth King's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court's decision was issued on February 27, 2026, and no further action or compliance is required by regulated entities.

City of Taylor v. Marek - Official Capacity Case Abated

The Texas Court of Appeals has abated the appeals in City of Taylor, Texas, et al. v. Robert Marek, et al. for an additional 90 days to allow parties to continue settlement negotiations. The court granted the joint motion to extend the abatement period.

Mark Smith v. Steptoe & Johnson PLLC - Malpractice

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, dismissed the appeal in Mark Smith v. Steptoe & Johnson PLLC for want of prosecution. The dismissal occurred because the appellant failed to file a required brief or motion for extension by the court's deadline.

Eli Woolsey v. Bohemian Bros., LLC - Declaratory Judgment Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, has dismissed the appeal in Eli Woolsey and Kate Woolsey v. Bohemian Bros., LLC, et al. The dismissal was granted upon the appellants' unopposed motion. The case involved a declaratory judgment action.

Com. v. Al Jumaili - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision affirming the judgment of sentence for Mohammed Rasool Kha Al Jumaili. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of evidence for convictions related to terroristic threats, simple assault, and recklessly endangering another person.

Commonwealth v. Mohn, J. - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Mohn, J. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence for Justin Mohn, who was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and various other offenses. The court found that Mohn waived his claims.

Com. v. Abdul-Malik - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Ali Abdul-Malik. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of the evidence for his conviction of Possession of a Firearm Without a License.

Com. v. Collins, M. - Appeal from PCRA Order

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Collins, M. The appeal concerns the dismissal of a petition for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), with the appellant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

Com. v. Rochester - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision affirming a criminal conviction for simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, and harassment. The appellant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence for the REAP conviction.

Commonwealth v. Sackie - PCRA Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the dismissal of a Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition filed by Dakins Roness Sackie. The court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed the lower court's decision based on its thorough opinion.

Com. v. Woods, E. - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the judgment of sentence for Erica T. Woods, who was convicted of charges related to a vehicular accident. The appeal concerned the sentence imposed after a non-jury trial.

Com. v. Flythe - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision affirming the lower court's judgment of sentence for Antarrios J. Flythe on firearms offenses. The appeal challenged the denial of a motion to suppress and the sufficiency of the evidence.

Com. v. Brown-Camp - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed orders granting post-conviction relief to defendants Bryan Brown-Camp and Maurice Smith. The court found that the lower court erred in granting relief on PCRA petitions related to their convictions for third-degree murder and conspiracy to commit robbery.

Stetler v. Eltookhy - Pennsylvania Superior Court Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in Stetler v. Eltookhy, reversing an order that denied a petition to strike/open a confessed judgment. The court also granted the plaintiff leave to amend the complaint to include a co-defendant.

Com. v. Meadows - Probation Violation Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision affirming a lower court's judgment of sentence for Brian Meadows, who appealed the revocation of his probation. The appeal concerned his failure to report to probation officers while incarcerated or in halfway houses in New Jersey.

E.Q. v. M.G.P. - Custody Dispute Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in E.Q. v. M.G.P., vacating a lower court's custody order. The court remanded the case for a new final custody order in compliance with state statutes regarding child custody.

Cook v. Philadelphia Federal Credit Union - Appeal of Arbitration Order

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed a lower court's order that overruled preliminary objections to compel arbitration in a putative class action. The case involves claims of improper notice of repossession and disposition of repossessed vehicles filed by consumers against Philadelphia Federal Credit Union.

Commonwealth v. Lassends - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a judgment of sentence for Harold Joel Lassends, who was convicted of Persons Not to Possess Firearms. The court addressed challenges to an evidentiary ruling and the sufficiency of evidence.

US v. Malcolm Moore - Affirmation of Sentence

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the sentence of Malcolm Moore, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found that Moore's prior conviction for assault with a deadly weapon qualified as a crime of violence, supporting the sentencing enhancements applied by the district court.

Tracy Howard v. United Airlines - Civil Complaint Affirmation

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a civil complaint filed by Tracy Howard against United Airlines. The unpublished opinion stated that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The court denied the appellant's motions to supplement the record.

Paytawn Erskine v. Accenture Federal Services, LLC - Appeal of District Court Order

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order dismissing a civil action filed by Paytawn Andrew Erskine against Accenture Federal Services, LLC. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's denial of motions to alter judgment and file a second amended complaint, and its granting of the defendant's motion to dismiss.

Pisner v. Attorney Grievance Commission - Appeal Dismissed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Gary Pisner's appeal of a district court order remanding his case to state court. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to review the remand order, as such orders are generally not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d).

Shakeri v Allen - Affirmation of District Court Decision

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in Shakeri v. Allen, dismissing the plaintiff's civil action. The unpublished opinion found no reversible error in the district court's ruling, which was based on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

US v. Robert Stencil - Affirmation of Recusal Denial, Dismissal of Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and dismissed in part the appeal of Robert Leslie Stencil. The court dismissed the appeal concerning the denial of Stencil's motions due to a late filing of the notice of appeal, while affirming the denial of his motion for recusal.

Marian Shearin v. United States - Civil Action Affirmance

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of Marian Shearin's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appellate court modified the lower court's order to explicitly state the dismissal was without prejudice.

Davis v. Goodwin - Civil Complaint Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a civil complaint filed by William Hercules Davis, Jr. The dismissal was based on the complaint's failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). This unpublished opinion does not set precedent.

US v. Jamie Ewings - Affirmation of Sentence

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Jamie Ewings for theft of government property. The court found no plain error in the acceptance of the guilty plea and affirmed the 13-month sentence as procedurally and substantively reasonable.

US v. Simpson - Affirmation of Wire Fraud Conviction

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of William Simpson, II, for wire fraud related to defrauding the United States of over one million dollars in COVID-19 relief funds. The court found the sentence of 36 months imprisonment to be procedurally and substantively reasonable.

US v. David Starkey - Affirmation of Felon in Possession Conviction

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of David Allen Starkey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no error in the district court's denial of Starkey's motion to dismiss the indictment on Second Amendment grounds and affirmed the sentence imposed.

Watson v. Deberry - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of James R. Watson Jr.'s pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal without prejudice or the denial of the motion for reconsideration.

Tiffany Locus v. Zachariah Ross - Appeal of Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of Tiffany Locus's case for lack of jurisdiction. The court found that Locus failed to challenge the basis for the dismissal in her informal brief, thereby forfeiting appellate review.

Henson v. City of Virginia Beach - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of a pro se appellant's amended complaint. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal of claims brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Motions to supplement the record were denied.

Henson v. City of Virginia Beach - Appeal Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a pro se appellant's amended complaint. The appellant alleged violations under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal for failure to state a claim.

Sammy Mclain Jr. v. Matt Young - Appeal of § 1983 Complaint Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Sammy Mclain Jr.'s § 1983 complaint. The dismissal was based on the complaint being frivolous and failing to state a claim. The appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's orders.

Dodson v. Lutheran Village - Affirmation of Summary Judgment Ruling

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's ruling in Dodson v. Lutheran Village, granting summary judgment to the defendant on claims of religious discrimination and failure to accommodate. The unpublished opinion means the ruling does not set precedent.

Vasquez Escobar v. Bondi - Immigration Review Denial

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review filed by Catalina B. Vasquez Escobar and her son, natives of Guatemala, challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals' dismissal of their asylum and withholding of removal applications. The court found substantial evidence supported the denial.

US v. Anthony Chosewood - Sentence Reduction Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Scott Chosewood's motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The unpublished opinion means this decision does not set precedent.

Capel v. Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of a pro se appellant's amended complaint. The complaint raised claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Fair Housing Act. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal.

Jermaine Capel v. Norfolk Public Schools - Dismissal Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Jermaine Capel's amended complaint against Norfolk Public Schools. The claims were brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal.

C.D. v. Arlington School Board - IDEA Special Education Dispute

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision regarding a special education dispute under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The unpublished opinion upheld the school board's actions concerning a student's eligibility and educational program.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Ubong Christopher Ubokudom. The petition sought to compel the district court to appoint counsel for his daughter and rule on pending motions for injunctive relief. The court found no undue delay or entitlement to mandamus relief.