Lacy v. Lacy - Louisiana Court of Appeal Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ application in the case of Marqueta Lacy v. Stephen Lacy. One judge noted the writ application's failure to comply with uniform rules regarding opposition or statement of no opposition.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Appeal

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

SBK Art LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK Art LLC's petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. §1782 in aid of foreign litigation. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, even though the documents might not be directly discoverable from the client abroad.

Care One LLC v. NLRB - Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction for Care One LLC and affiliated health care facilities. The facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed due to a lack of quorum. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm, thus affirming the denial.

Mar-Can Transport vs. Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court ruling, directing the Local 854 Pension Fund to reduce Mar-Can Transportation Company's ERISA withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The decision clarifies the interpretation of "unfunded vested benefits" under ERISA Section 1415(c) when an employer switches multiemployer pension plans due to union representation changes.

Reidy Contracting Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage to Reidy Contracting Group, LLC. The court found Reidy was an additional insured and that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and should be construed against Mt. Hawley.

CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions, vacating in part, affirming in part, and reversing in part the lower court's decision. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials under the Fair Housing Act, while also addressing Fair Credit Reporting Act claims.

US v Jimenez - 105 Months Prison Sentence for Felony Conviction

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment sentencing William Jimenez to 105 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release for possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. The court upheld the special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mental health counseling.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Judgment Vacated

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a Tax Court order that granted summary judgment to Joseph Safdieh, ruling that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue can assess penalties for failing to report control of a foreign business. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.

GEICO v. Mayzenberg - Insurance Reimbursement Dispute

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a lower court ruling that allowed GEICO to deny no-fault insurance reimbursements to healthcare providers based on alleged kickbacks for patient referrals. The court remanded the case for further proceedings following a clarification from the New York Court of Appeals.

Bugliotti v. Argentina - Bondholders Sue Over Defaulted Sovereign Bonds

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's dismissal of a lawsuit by bondholders against the Republic of Argentina over defaulted sovereign bonds. The court found that some of the bondholders' claims are timely under New York's COVID-era tolling provisions and that they now have the authority under Argentine law to sue.

Sacaza v. City of New York - Qualified Immunity Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's denial of summary judgment for a New York City detective in a false arrest and malicious prosecution case. The court found that arguable probable cause existed, entitling the detective to qualified immunity.

Jin v. City of New York - Qualified Immunity Appeal

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a lower court's decision, granting qualified immunity to NYPD officers in a false arrest claim. The court found arguable probable cause for the arrest, overturning the denial of summary judgment and emphasizing a case-by-case assessment for domestic violence reports.

United States v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm Conviction Affirmed

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivanjoel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Sufiyan v. Bondi - Asylum, Withholding, CAT Appeal Decision

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals granted in part and remanded a petition for review in Sufiyan v. Bondi. The court found that the Board of Immigration Appeals erred by not determining if the petitioner would be eligible for asylum or withholding of removal but for the material support bar, which prevents him from applying for a waiver. The petition for review of the CAT claim was denied.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Concealed Carry License Application Case

The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New York's concealed carry license application process. The court held that state judges are absolutely immune from individual-capacity suits and that federal courts lack jurisdiction for official-capacity claims due to Article III's case-or-controversy requirement.

Peña Garcia v. Dept of Labor - Workers' Compensation

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis-infused edibles under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, citing federal law.

Miller v. Lamanna - Appeal of Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's dismissal of a former corrections officer's discrimination and retaliation claims. The appellate court found the district court erred by converting a summary judgment motion into a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, considering only the complaint's allegations.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

J&R Paraiso LLC v. Erick Garcia - Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's judgment against Erick Garcia in a case involving a promissory note and business sale. The court upheld the default judgment and dismissed Garcia's counterclaims.

Shaul Moshe Sugar v. David Pollack - Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's order compelling arbitration in the case of Shaul Moshe Sugar v. David Pollack. The dispute involves a joint venture for a real estate project in Indiana.

Mario Quesada v. Compassion First Pet Hospitals - Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a jury verdict of no cause found in favor of Compassion First Pet Hospitals and Red Bank Veterinary Hospital in a case brought by Mario Quesada. The opinion is designated as non-precedential.

6 Pomona Management LLC v Nelson Cross - Landlord-Tenant Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court affirmed a lower court's judgment of possession for a landlord in a landlord-tenant dispute. The defendant appealed the decision based on unpaid rent and a broken refrigerator, but the court found no error in the original ruling.

State of New Jersey v. Dashawn T. Carrillo - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion in State of New Jersey v. Dashawn T. Carrillo. The case involves an appeal from a conviction for unlawful possession of a handgun, stemming from a vehicle stop based on a disputed shooting investigation.

Apache Auto Wreckers v. Ridgefield Park Zoning Board - Zoning Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reviewed a zoning dispute involving Apache Auto Wreckers, Inc. and the Village of Ridgefield Park Zoning Board. The court affirmed the trial court's order remanding the matter to the Board to re-open the hearing regarding the plaintiff's application.

DCPP v. A.T. - Guardianship of C.J. III

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued an opinion in DCPP v. A.T., concerning the termination of parental rights for a minor, C.J. III. The parents are appealing the trial court's judgment, arguing deficiencies in the court's analysis regarding the child's best interests and the harm caused by termination.

State of New Jersey v. David D. Martinez - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of State of New Jersey v. David D. Martinez. The defendant was convicted of felony murder, armed robbery, conspiracy, and weapons offenses, and sentenced to thirty years in prison. The appeal raises issues regarding lesser-included offense instructions and the admissibility of lay-opinion testimony.

Ottmann v. Hanlon - Business Dispute Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed most trial court orders in the business dispute between Robert Ottmann and Christopher Hanlon. However, the appellate court reversed the dismissal of a claim based on res judicata, finding the issue regarding a K-1 tax form arose after prior litigation.

New Jersey v. Jaibre Parker - Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the denial of a post-conviction relief petition filed by Jaibre Parker. The court found no error in the lower court's decision not to conduct an evidentiary hearing, upholding the denial of the petition.

OFAC Designations and Removals - Counter Terrorism, North Korea, Narcotics

The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has updated its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List with new designations related to counter-terrorism, North Korea, and narcotics. These updates include adding individuals involved in facilitating North Korea sanctions evasion and disrupting illicit networks.

S. Donahue v. DHS (SCSC) - Commonwealth Court Case

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the State Civil Service Commission's decision to dismiss Sean Donahue's appeal. The court found the appeal was untimely filed and lacked sufficient allegations of discrimination. The case involved claims of discrimination based on political opinion, religion, national origin, and age, as well as misuse of bilingual requirements in hiring.

Save A Lot v. S. Morales (WCAB) - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania reviewed a decision by the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board affirming a penalty and attorney's fees against Save A Lot for failing to timely pay medical expenses. The court affirmed the Board's order, finding the employer liable for penalties and fees.

In re: Appeal of Cresheim Valley Realty Co. LP - Pennsylvania Historic Designation Appeal

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a lower court's decision upholding the Philadelphia Historical Commission's designation of a property as historic. The owner argued the designation would create a default event under their mortgage agreement and violated due process.

T.A. Skinger v. Mercer County TCB - Tax Sale Appeal

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in T.A. Skinger v. Mercer County TCB, affirming a lower court's decision to deny an objection to a tax sale. The court found that proper notice was provided to the appellant regarding the sale of her property.

C. Puleo v. UCBR - Unemployment Compensation Appeal

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a decision dismissing an unemployment compensation appeal as untimely. The court found that the claimant's appeal was filed after the 15-day deadline stipulated by Section 501(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.

K&A Insurance Agency v. Philadelphia Historical Commission - Historic Designation Appeal

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the trial court's decision denying K&A Insurance Agency's appeal of the Philadelphia Historical Commission's designation of a property as historic. The court upheld the designation based on the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance.

L. Dittman v. UCBR - Unemployment Compensation Benefits

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a decision denying unemployment benefits to Laura Dittman. The denial was based on her violation of S & T Bank's telework agreement, which required employees to notify the company before relocating out-of-state. Dittman moved to Colorado without prior notification.

Salt of the Earth Cream Recalled Due to Chemical Hazard

Health Canada has issued a consumer product recall for Salt of the Earth Cedar and Amyris Replenish Cream due to a chemical hazard. The product contains methyl eugenol above the maximum concentration allowed by the Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist. Consumers are advised to stop using the product immediately.

Modofo Tool 5-in-1 Detector Recalled Due to Potential Failure

Health Canada has recalled the Modofo Tool 5 in 1 Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Detector (model HTB-05) due to a potential failure to operate, posing a fire hazard. Approximately 500 units were sold in Canada between October 2025 and March 2026.

Cool Fidget Toy Stress Ball Recalled for Ingestion Hazard

Health Canada has recalled the "Cool Fidget Toy Stress Ball" due to an ingestion hazard posed by small, powerful magnets. The product fails to meet safety performance criteria under the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act. Consumers are instructed to stop using and dispose of the product.

Baixiang Noodles Recalled Due to Undeclared Peanut Allergen

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has issued a recall for Baixiang brand Artificial Spicy Beef Soup Flavor Instant Noodles due to undeclared peanut allergen. Consumers are advised not to use the affected product, and retailers are instructed to remove it from sale.

Health Canada Recall: Cream Chargers Sold for Inhalation Without Market Authorization

Health Canada has issued a recall for various brands of cream chargers sold for inhalation without market authorization. Consumers are warned not to inhale nitrous oxide products recreationally and to seek medical attention if experiencing side effects. Retailers and wholesalers are involved in the recall.

ZoRaw Milk Chocolate Recalled for Undeclared Almond and Peanut

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has issued a recall for ZoRaw brand Milk Chocolate products due to undeclared almond and peanut allergens. Consumers are advised not to consume the affected products.

ICIM Halloumi Cheese Recalled Due to Undeclared Milk

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has issued a recall for ICIM brand Halloumi Cheese due to undeclared sheep milk and goat milk. Consumers are advised not to use, sell, serve, or distribute the affected product.

Bell Canada Withdraws Features of Small Business Service

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has approved Bell Canada's application to withdraw certain features of its Bell Total Connect for Small Business service. The affected features include Soft Client, Mobile Application, and Call Dashboard, due to end-of-life equipment. The withdrawal is effective September 30, 2025.

CRTC Policy Prohibits Fees Barrier to Switching Cellphone and Internet Plans

The CRTC has issued a new policy prohibiting fees that act as a barrier for consumers switching cellphone and Internet plans. These changes, effective June 12, 2026, amend the Wireless Code and Internet Code to empower consumers and align with recent amendments to the Telecommunications Act.

Telecom Consultation on CCTS Fee Structure

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has extended deadlines for a consultation on the fee structure and dispute mechanism of the Commission for Complaints for Telecom-television Services Inc. (CCTS). The revised deadlines for submissions are April 7, 2026, for CCTS responses, April 21, 2026, for interventions, and May 26, 2026, for replies.

Lawrence v. Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP - Opinion Vacating in Part

The Kentucky Supreme Court vacated in part an order from the Court of Appeals in Lawrence v. Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP. The Supreme Court's decision vacates the final three paragraphs of the Court of Appeals' September 12, 2025 Order, which had sua sponte restricted the appellant's ability to file future appeals and imposed sanctions.

USTR Section 301 Investigations into Excess Capacity

The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has initiated Section 301 investigations into structural excess capacity and production in 16 economies. The USTR is seeking public comments on these investigations, with a deadline of April 15, 2026.

Suhr v. Woflow Inc. - Class Action Complaint

A class action complaint has been filed against Woflow Inc. by Jenni Suhr in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified as Case Number 3:26-cv-02161, was filed on March 12, 2026, and concerns alleged contract violations.