Hinkley v. Roadway Express, Inc - Labor Dispute

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's summary judgment in favor of Roadway Express, Inc. and Teamsters Local Union #41 in a labor dispute filed by Randal Hinkley. The court found no evidence that the union breached its duty of fair representation in handling the grievance regarding Hinkley's termination.

Gonzalez Tomasini v. DeJoy - Employment Case Appeal

The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss an employment case against the United States Postal Service. The dismissal was based on a finding that the plaintiff, Orlando González Tomasini, tampered with a witness, his former wife, by attempting to dissuade her from testifying.

BlueRadios Inc. v. Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, P.C. - Legal Malpractice Appeal

The First Circuit Court of Appeals partially reversed and vacated a district court ruling in a legal malpractice case brought by BlueRadios Inc. against law firm Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, P.C. The appellate court found that BlueRadios' claims might not be untimely and that an attorney-client relationship could exist, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Barrett v. United States - Firearms Offenses and Cumulative Punishments

The Supreme Court ruled in Barrett v. United States that a single act violating both 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1)(A)(i) and §924(j) can only yield one conviction, not two. This decision resolves a circuit split regarding cumulative punishments for firearms offenses that cause death.

Hebert v. Donahue - Insurance Policy Dispute

The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision regarding the proceeds of a federal life insurance policy. The court found that the designation of beneficiaries was valid, awarding the proceeds to the deceased's ex-wife and sons rather than his estate.

Supreme Court: Delaware affidavit law not applicable in federal court

The Supreme Court ruled that Delaware's affidavit of merit law does not apply in federal court for medical malpractice cases. The Court held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, which requires a 'short and plain statement of the claim,' displaces contrary state pleading rules.

Stokinger v. Armslist, LLC - Personal Jurisdiction in Online Marketplaces

The First Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed a case concerning personal jurisdiction over Armslist, LLC, an online marketplace for firearms. The court affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court's dismissal of claims related to a firearm sale facilitated by the website.

Supreme Court: Reasonable Time Limit Applies to Void Judgment Motions

The Supreme Court ruled that the "reasonable time" limit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1) applies to motions seeking to vacate void judgments under Rule 60(b)(4). This decision clarifies the procedural requirements for challenging judgments based on alleged defects in service.

Alicea v. Cincinnati Incorporated - Court Opinion

The First Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's summary judgment in favor of Cincinnati Incorporated in a product liability case. The court found a material factual dispute regarding the design defect claim for a laser-cutting system that caused a fatal accident. The ruling allows the estate's design-related claims to proceed.

Supreme Court Rules on Mandatory Victims Restitution Act

The Supreme Court ruled that restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA) constitutes criminal punishment for Ex Post Facto Clause purposes. The Court reversed the Eighth Circuit's decision, holding that the MVRA's restitution provisions are criminal sanctions, not civil remedies.