Rate Reform and Regulatory Reform Task Force Reports and Recommendations
Summary
The STB has published summaries of two task force reports: the Rate Reform Task Force issued recommendations in April 2019 for reforming railroad rate methodology, including simplified SAC tests, a new Incumbent Network Cost Analysis approach, and proposals for mandatory arbitration of small rate disputes; the Regulatory Reform Task Force issued a 90-day status report in May 2017 and held a stakeholder listening session in July 2017 pursuant to Executive Order 13,777. Several Rate Reform recommendations have progressed to formal rulemaking in Docket Nos. EP 755, EP 756, and EP 385 (Sub-No. 8), with final rules adopted in 2020.
“The Rate Reform Task Force was established by Chairman Ann Begeman in January 2018 to develop recommendations to reform and streamline the Board's rate methodology for large cases, and to determine how to best provide a rate review process for smaller rate cases.”
Carriers and shippers engaged in STB rate proceedings should review the task force recommendations in detail, as several have progressed to final rules (EP 756 on market dominance and EP 385 Sub-No. 8 on waybill sampling) and others remain under consideration in EP 755 (Final Offer Rate Review). Stakeholders should assess which recommendations—particularly those proposing new rate methodologies, structural remedies for revenue-adequate carriers, or modified Three-Benchmark accessibility—would materially affect their litigation exposure or operational flexibility.
About this source
GovPing monitors US Surface Transportation Board for new transportation regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 2 changes logged to date.
What changed
The Rate Reform Task Force report recommends alternative methodologies for calculating railroad rates, including simplified Stand-Alone Cost tests, a new Incumbent Network Cost Analysis approach, and legislative authority for mandatory arbitration of smaller disputes. The Regulatory Reform Task Force was established under Executive Order 13,777 to review existing regulations for potential repeal, replacement, or modification.
Railroads and shippers engaged in STB rate proceedings should monitor the progress of these recommendations through the rulemaking process. The Board has already adopted final rules in Docket EP 756 (Market Dominance Streamlined Approach) and EP 385 Sub-No. 8 (Waybill Sample Reporting), while Docket EP 755 (Final Offer Rate Review) remains pending.
Archived snapshot
Apr 22, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Home » News & Communications » Agency Task Forces
Agency Task Forces
The Surface Transportation Board currently has two task forces focused on reforming different parts of the agency’s regulations: the Rate Reform Task Force and the Regulatory Reform Task Force.
Rate Reform Task Force
Background
The Rate Reform Task Force was established by Chairman Ann Begeman in January 2018 to develop recommendations to reform and streamline the Board’s rate methodology for large cases, and to determine how to best provide a rate review process for smaller rate cases.
In April 2018, the Board announced that the task force would begin holding informal meetings with stakeholders to discuss options and ideas for reforming the Board’s rate review methodologies. Meetings with stakeholders were held throughout 2018.
Task Force Report
The task force issued its report to the Board in April 2019 (see Press Release). In the report, the task force made the following recommendations:
Offering proposals that the Board could adopt to reduce the cost and complexity of small rate disputes;
Calling for legislation that would permit the Board to require arbitration of small rate disputes;
Suggesting significant simplification of the existing Stand-Alone Cost (SAC) test;
Proposing an entirely new rate methodology called Incumbent Network Cost Analysis that would look at the cost structure of the defendant carrier itself instead of a hypothetical stand-alone carrier;
Suggesting a definition for long-term revenue adequacy and three structural remedies that could be tied to this finding: (1) a rate-increase constraint (limiting carriers from raising rates on certain traffic once long-term revenue adequacy has been achieved); (2) a reversal of the Board’s long-standing “Bottleneck” decisions so that shippers can direct long-term revenue adequate carriers to deliver movements to a feasible interchange of the shipper’s choosing; and (3) a restoration of certain simplifications in the existing Simplified SAC process;
Increasing the accessibility of the Three-Benchmark comparison approach by, among other things, removing limitations on the aggregation of claims, improving sampling procedures, and instituting page limits on arguments surrounding “other relevant factors;” and
Seeking simplification of the market dominance determination.
A copy of the full report can be accessed here: “ Rate Reform Task Force – Report to the Surface Transportation Board ” (April 25, 2019).
Section 5 Meetings
Subsequent to the report’s publication, the Board Members participated in “Section 5” meetings to discuss the recommendations directly with the task force. The required summaries of the meetings prepared by the Board’s General Counsel are below:
- Meeting Summary: May 1, 2019.
- Meeting Summary: May 3, 2019.
- Meeting Summary: May 7, 2019.
- Meeting Summary: May 10, 2019.
Other Information
Subsequent to the report’s release, the Board received two letters from members of the U.S. Senate on the report, which are provided below, along with the Board’s responses:
Letter from Senators Baldwin and Kennedy re. Rate Reform Task Force and Demurrage, July 25, 2019
- STB Response to Senators Baldwin and Kennedy re. Rate Reform Task Force and Demurrage, Aug. 8, 2019 Additional correspondence in response to the task force report can be found on the Non-Docketed Public Correspondence page (look for correspondence with the (†) symbol).
Board Actions
On September 12, 2019, the Board issued two related Notices of Proposed Rulemaking based on recommendations provided in the task force’s report. First, in Final Offer Rate Review, Docket No. EP 755, the Board proposed a new methodology for challenging rates in smaller disputes. Second, in Market Dominance Streamlined Approach, Docket No. EP 756, the Board proposed a streamlined approach for shippers to plead market dominance in rate reasonableness proceedings. More information about these two rulemakings is available here. On August 3, 2020, the Board adopted final rules in Market Dominance Streamlined Approach. More information is available here.
On November 29, 2019, the Board issued another Notice of Proposed Rulemaking based on one of the task force’s recommendations. In Waybill Sample Reporting, EP 385 (Sub-No. 8), the Board proposed new regulations that would simplify the sampling rates for non-intermodal carload shipments and to specify separate sampling strata and rates for intermodal shipments, which would create a more robust Waybill Sample that would assist the Board in its decision-making and analyses. More information about the Board’s proposal is available here. On September 3, 2020, the Board adopted a final rule in Waybill Sample Reporting. More information on the final rule is available here.
Regulatory Reform Task Force
Background
The Regulatory Reform Task Force was established to comply with the spirit of Executive Order 13,777 (EO), issued February 24, 2017. The initial goals of the Regulatory Reform Task Force are to: (i) improve implementation of regulatory reform initiatives and policies pursuant to the EO; and (ii) evaluate existing regulations to identify regulations for repeal, replacement, or modification, consistent with applicable law.
Task Force Reports
The Regulatory Reform Task Force issued a status report 90 days after its creation, followed by a listening session in which stakeholders were invited to present their views on streamlining the agency’s regulations. Subsequent to the listening session, the task force issued a second status report.
- 90-Day Status Report (May 25, 2017)
- Regulatory Reform Task Force, Listening Session Transcript (July 25, 2017)
- Status Report (Nov. 21, 2017)
Board Actions
Based on the task force’s recommendations, the Board has taken a number of actions to streamline its regulations, including:
Finalizing rules to modify its procedures pertaining to Offers of Financial Assistance to improve that process and protect it against abuse. Offers of Financial Assistance, Docket No. EP 729 (STB served June 29, 2017).
Updated its long-standing rules on ex parte communications in informal rulemaking proceedings to permit such communications, subject to disclosure requirements, and to make other clarifications as to when and how interested persons may communicate with the Board about other pending proceedings. Ex Parte Communications in Informal Rulemaking Proceedings, Docket No. EP 739 (STB served Feb. 28, 2018).
Replacing outdated procedural and filing rules, specifically, by allowing payment of filing fees and other payments due to the Board through www.pay.gov; permitting nearly all filings to be made by e-filing on the Board’s website; and eliminating the requirement that paper copies be filed with the Board in nearly all instances. Payment, Filing, and Service Procedures, Docket No. EP 747 (STB served Mar. 22, 2019).
Modifying its regulations to allow water carriers to publish, file, and keep their tariffs electronically in lieu of submitting paper filings. Water Carrier Tariff Filing Procedures, Docket No. EP 743 (STB served May 9, 2019).
Related changes
Get daily alerts for US Surface Transportation Board
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from STB.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when US Surface Transportation Board publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.