PHMSA Removes Obsolete Fax Option from Pipeline Safety Condition Reporting

Content

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

This final rule removes an obsolete provision from the safety-related condition reporting requirements in 49 CFR 191.25.

DATES:

Effective on August 3, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angela Hill, Transportation Specialist, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, 202-680-2034, angela.hill@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In this final rule, PHMSA is removing an obsolete provision from the safety-related condition reporting requirements in § 191.25.
Specifically, § 191.25(c) gives operators the option to file a safety-related condition report by email or by facsimile. PHMSA
no longer allows operators to file a safety-related condition report by facsimile. PHMSA is therefore revising § 191.25(c)
to remove all references to filing a safety-related condition report by facsimile. Safety-related condition reports must be
filed by email to InformationResourcesManager@dot.gov. This correction will remove unnecessary delays in the process of operators filing a safety-related condition report.

Regulatory Analyses and Notices:

A. Legal Authority

This final rule is published under the authority of the Secretary of Transportation set forth in the Federal Pipeline Safety
Laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.) and delegated to the PHMSA Administrator pursuant to 49 CFR 1.97. PHMSA has good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to issue
this final rule without prior notice and comment. PHMSA no longer accepts safety-related condition reports by facsimile and
is simply revising the safety-related condition reporting requirements in § 191.25(c) to account for that fact. PHMSA finds
that notice and comment is unnecessary because the facsimile number in § 191.25(c) is obsolete and serves no useful purpose.

B. Executive Order 12866

E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as implemented by DOT Order 2100.6B (“Policies and Procedures for Rulemaking”) and DOT Order 2100.7 (“Ensuring Reliance upon
Sound Economic Analysis in Department of Transportation Policies, Programs, and Activities”), requires agencies to regulate
in the “most cost-effective manner,” to make a “reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation justify
its costs,” and to develop regulations that “impose the least burden on society.” In arriving at those conclusions, E.O. 12866
requires that agencies should consider “both quantifiable measures . . . and qualitative measures of costs and benefits that
are difficult to quantify” and “maximize net benefits . . . unless a statute requires another regulatory approach.” E.O. 12866
also requires that “agencies should assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives, including the alternative
of not regulating.” DOT Order 2100.6B directs that PHMSA and other Operating Administrations must generally choose the “least
costly regulatory alternative that achieves the relevant objectives” unless required by law or compelling safety need. DOT
Order 2100.6B also specifies that regulations should generally “not be issued unless their benefits are expected to exceed
their costs” except where required by law or compelling safety need. DOT Order 2100.7 requires that “all rulemaking activities
shall be based on sound economic principles and analysis supported by rigorous cost-benefit requirement.”

E.O. 12866 and DOT Order 2100.6B also require that PHMSA submit “significant regulatory actions” to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Executive Office of the President's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
This final rule is a not significant regulatory action pursuant to E.O. 12866; OMB also has not designated this rule as a
“major rule” as defined by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.).

PHMSA has complied with the procedural and analytical requirements in E.O. 12866 as implemented by DOT Order 2100.6B and DOT
Order 2100.7. This final rule does not impose new burdens, as the changes made therein are non-substantive and do not impose
new requirements in the Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations. Similarly, the final rule does not have any adverse effects on
safety.

C. Executive Orders 14192 and 14219

This final rule is considered a deregulatory action pursuant to E.O. 14192, Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation. PHMSA estimates that the total costs of the rule on the regulated community will be de minimis. This final rule requires operators to file a safety-related condition exclusively by email. The non-substantive changes of
this rulemaking do not impose any new requirements on pipeline operators and should improve the clarity and compliance with
the Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations. Nor does this rule implicate any of the factors identified in section 2(a) of E.O.
14219, Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's “Department of Government Efficiency” Deregulatory Initiative, indicative that a regulation is “unlawful . . . [or] that undermine[s] the national interest.”

D. Energy-Related Executive Orders 13211, 14154, and 14156

The President has declared in E.O. 14156, Declaring a National Energy Emergency, a National emergency to address America's inadequate energy development production, transportation, refining, and generation
capacity. Similarly, E.O. 14154, Unleashing American Energy, asserts a Federal policy to unleash American energy by ensuing access to abundant supplies of reliable, affordable energy
from (inter alia) the removal of “undue burden[s]” on the identification, development, or use of domestic energy resources
such as PHMSA-jurisdictional gases and hazardous liquids. PHMSA finds this final rule is consistent with each of E.O. 14156
and E.O. 14154. The final rule will clarify how to file a safety-related condition report in accordance with § 191.25 by removing
language pertaining to filing safety-related condition reports by facsimile. The provisions of this final rule are non-substantive
and will not impose new requirements on pipeline operators; they are intended to promote the ease of operators complying with
the existing regulations.

This final rule is not a “significant energy action” under E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use, which requires Federal agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for any “significant energy action.” Because this
final rule is not a significant action under E.O. 12866, it will not have a significant adverse effect on supply, distribution,
or energy use.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

PHMSA analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in E.O. 13132, Federalism, and the Presidential Memorandum (“Preemption”) published in the
Federal Register
on May 22, 2009. E.O. 13132 requires agencies to assure meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development
of regulatory policies that may have “substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.”

While the final rule may operate to preempt some State requirements, it would not impose any regulation that has substantial
direct effects on the

States, the relationship between the National Government and the States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities
among the various levels of government. Section 60104(c) of the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws prohibits certain State safety
regulation of interstate pipelines. Under the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws, States that have submitted a current certification
under section 60105(a) can augment Federal pipeline safety requirements for intrastate pipelines regulated by PHMSA but may
not approve safety requirements less stringent than those required by Federal law. A State may also regulate an intrastate
pipeline facility that PHMSA does not regulate. The preemptive effect of the regulatory amendments in this final rule is limited
to the minimum level necessary to achieve the objectives of the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws. Therefore, the consultation
and funding requirements of E.O. 13132 do not apply.

F. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires Federal agencies to conduct a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) for a final rule subject to notice-and-comment
rulemaking, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities. The RFA applies only to rules for which an agency is required to first publish a proposed rule (see 5 U.S.C. 603(a) and 604(a)). PHMSA is not required to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking for this final rule, so the
RFA does not apply. However, PHMSA expects the regulatory amendments introduced here will reduce burdens and provide regulatory
certainty for operators by clarifying that PHMSA does not accept facsimiles for safety-related condition reporting, consistent
with its experience operators prefer to submit such reporting by email. Further, these changes are not expected to impose
additional burdens on any operator.

G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) requires agencies to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, and the private
sector. For any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments, in the aggregate of $100 million or more in 1996 dollars ($203 million in 2024) in any given year,
the agency must prepare, amongst other things, a written statement that qualitatively and quantitatively assesses the costs
and benefits of the Federal mandate.

This final rule does not impose unfunded mandates under UMRA because it does not result in costs of $100 million or more (in
1996 dollars) per year for either State, local, or Tribal governments, or to the private sector.

H. National Environmental Policy Act

PHMSA has analyzed this rule pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and has determined it is categorically excluded under 23 CFR 771.117(c)(20), which applies to the promulgation of rules,
regulations, and directives. Under section 9 of DOT Order 5610.1D, PHMSA may apply a categorical exclusion established in
another Operating Administration's procedures. PHMSA followed the requirements outlined in DOT Order 5610.1D to apply a categorical
exclusion issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to this deregulatory action. PHMSA does not anticipate any adverse
environmental impacts from this rule, and PHMSA has determined no unusual circumstances are present under 23 CFR 771.117(b).
PHMSA's Categorical Exclusion Determination memo for this action is available on PHMSA's website. (1)

I. Executive Order 13175

PHMSA analyzed this final rule according to the principles and criteria in E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, and DOT Order 5301.1A (“Department of Transportation Tribal Consultation Policies and Procedures”). E.O. 13175 requires agencies
to assure meaningful and timely input from Tribal government representatives in the development of rules that significantly
or uniquely affect Tribal communities by imposing “substantial direct compliance costs” or “substantial direct effects” on
such communities or the relationship or distribution of power between the Federal Government and Tribes.

PHMSA assessed the impact of the final rule and determined that it will not significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities
or Indian Tribal governments. The rulemaking's regulatory amendments have a broad, national scope; therefore, this final rule
will not significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities, much less impose substantial compliance costs on Native American
Tribal governments or mandate Tribal action. For these reasons, PHMSA has concluded that the funding and consultation requirements
of E.O. 13175 and DOT Order 5301.1A do not apply.

J. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and its implementing regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d) requires that PHMSA provide interested members of the public and affected
agencies with an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping requests. This rulemaking will not create,
amend, or rescind any existing information collections.

K. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis

E.O. 13609, Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation, requires agencies consider whether the impacts associated with significant variations between domestic and international regulatory
approaches are unnecessary or may impair the ability of American business to export and compete internationally. In meeting
shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues, international regulatory cooperation
can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that are or would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation.
International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.

Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465),
prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles
to the foreign commerce of the United States. For purposes of these requirements, Federal agencies may participate in the
establishment of international standards, so long as the standards have a legitimate domestic objective, such as providing
for safety, and do not operate to exclude imports that meet this objective. The statute also requires consideration of international
standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards.

PHMSA engages with international standards setting bodies to protect the safety of the American public. PHMSA has assessed
the effects of the final rule and has determined that its regulatory amendments will not cause unnecessary obstacles to foreign
trade.

L. Cybersecurity and Executive Order 14028

E.O. 14028, Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity, directs the Federal Government to improve its efforts to identify, deter, and respond to “persistent and increasingly sophisticated
malicious cyber campaigns.” PHMSA has considered the effects of the final rule and has determined that its regulatory amendments
will not materially affect the cybersecurity risk profile for pipeline facilities.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 191

Natural gas, Pipeline safety.

In consideration of the foregoing, PHMSA amends 49 CFR part 191 as follows:

PART 191—TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL, INCIDENT, AND OTHER REPORTING

Regulatory Text 1. The authority citation for 49 CFR part 191 continues to read as follows:

Authority:

30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5121, 60101 et seq., and 49 CFR 1.97.

1. In § 191.25, revise paragraph (c) introductory text to read as follows:

§ 191.25 Filing safety-related condition reports.

---

(c) Reports must be filed by email to InformationResourcesManager@dot.gov. For a report made pursuant to § 191.23(a)(1) through (9), the report must be headed “Safety-Related Condition Report.” For
a report made pursuant to § 191.23(a)(10), the report must be headed “Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Exceedances.” All
reports must provide the following information:

---

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 22, 2026, under the authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.97. Paul J. Roberti, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2026-08059 Filed 4-23-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-60-P

Footnotes

(1) PHMSA, Implementing Procedures, https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/planning-and-analytics/environmental-analysis-and-compliance/implementing-procedures.

Download File

Download