Changeflow GovPing Transportation PHMSA Proposes Extending Pipeline Annual Report...
Priority review Consultation Amended Proposed

PHMSA Proposes Extending Pipeline Annual Report Deadlines to June 15, Comments Until June 23

Email

Summary

PHMSA proposes to extend the annual report deadline for operators of gas distribution pipelines, gas transmission pipelines, regulated gas gathering pipelines, Type R gas gathering pipelines, underground natural gas storage facilities, and liquefied natural gas facilities from March 15 to June 15. The proposal also extends the National Pipeline Mapping System information submission deadline for gas transmission and LNG facility operators to June 15. Public comments are accepted through June 23, 2026. Affected pipeline operators should monitor this proposal and consider submitting comments on the proposed deadline change.

“PHMSA continues to support extending the annual reporting deadlines from March 15 to June 15 in §§ 191.11 and 191.17 for gas distribution pipelines, gas transmission pipelines, regulated gas gathering pipelines, Type R gas gathering pipelines, UNGS facilities, and LNG facilities.”

PHMSA , verbatim from source
Why this matters

Operators of gas distribution, transmission, gathering pipelines, underground natural gas storage facilities, and LNG facilities should track this NPRM and prepare to adjust their annual reporting workflows if the June 15 deadline is finalized. The proposed NPMS deadline extension to June 15 aligns with existing hazardous liquid pipeline requirements, creating a uniform reporting calendar across pipeline sectors.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by PHMSA on regulations.gov . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors Regs.gov: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration for new transportation regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 97 changes logged to date.

What changed

PHMSA proposes amending 49 CFR 191.11 and 191.17 to extend the annual report submission deadline for gas pipeline operators from March 15 to June 15. The proposal would also extend the National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) information submission deadline under 49 CFR 191.29(b) for gas transmission and LNG facility operators to the same date. This change would align gas pipeline reporting deadlines with the existing June 15 deadline for hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines under 49 CFR 195.49.\n\nPipeline operators subject to these reporting requirements should review the proposed changes and consider submitting comments by June 23, 2026. The extension would reduce administrative burden by synchronizing multiple reporting deadlines and allowing operators to submit annual report and NPMS data together as a quality control step.

Archived snapshot

Apr 25, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Content

ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY:

This NPRM proposes to extend the annual report deadline for operators of gas distribution pipelines, gas transmission pipelines,
regulated gas gathering pipelines, Type R gas gathering lines, underground natural gas storage facilities, and liquefied natural
gas facilities. This NPRM also proposes to extend the National Pipeline Mapping System information submission deadline for
operators of gas transmission and liquefied natural gas facilities. Annual reports for gas pipeline and gas pipeline storage
facilities would be due on June 15, consistent with existing requirements for hazardous liquid pipelines.

DATES:

Comments must be received on or before June 23, 2026.

ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments identified by the Docket Number PHMSA-2025-0108 using any of the following methods:

E-Gov Web: https://www.regulations.gov. This site allows the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register
notice issued by any agency. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.

Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.

Hand Delivery: U.S. DOT Docket Management System: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Fax: 1-202-493-2251.

For commenting instructions and additional information about commenting, see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sayler Palabrica, Transportation Specialist, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, 202-744-0825, sayler.palabrica@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Discussion

On July 1, 2025, PHMSA published a direct final rule (DFR) extending the deadlines from March 15 to June 15 in 49 CFR 191.11
and 191.17 for operators to submit to PHMSA annual report data for gas distribution pipelines, gas transmission pipelines,
regulated gas gathering pipelines, Type R gas gathering pipelines, underground natural gas storage (UNGS) facilities, and
liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities (90 FR 28047 (July 1, 2025)). PHMSA explained in the DFR that the new deadline would
be consistent with the deadline for submitting annual reports for hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide facilities in 49 CFR
195.49 (90 FR 28047 (July 1, 2025)).

PHMSA received three comments from the public in response to the DFR. The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA)
and Air Liquide Large Industries US, L.P. (ALLIUS) supported the DFR but recommended that PHMSA also extend the deadline for
operators to submit geospatial information (GIS) to the National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS). (1 2) The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) described at length the benefits of Federal pipeline safety information and commented
that delay of operators providing annual report information undermines those benefits. (3) EDF further commented that overtime expenses caused by the annual report deadline can be mitigated with contractor support
and do not necessarily indicate that the report deadline is unduly burdensome.

Citing the receipt of adverse comments, on October 2, 2025, PHMSA withdrew the DFR in accordance with the requirements in
49 CFR 190.339 (90 FR 47620). PHMSA is reproposing the amendments in the DFR in this NPRM with certain revisions for the reasons
explained below.

PHMSA continues to support extending the annual reporting deadlines from March 15 to June 15 in §§ 191.11 and 191.17 for gas
distribution pipelines, gas transmission pipelines,

regulated gas gathering pipelines, Type R gas gathering pipelines, UNGS facilities, and LNG facilities. That extension would
align with the annual reporting deadline in § 195.49 for hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines that has been in effect
more than a decade. PHMSA does not agree with EDF's comment that creating a uniform annual reporting deadline would undermine
safety. Though useful to PHMSA and to other stakeholders, annual reports do not contain urgent or time-sensitive safety information;
they contain summary information that is generally used to provide an understanding of overall trends in the Nation's pipeline
transportation network. PHMSA's experience with the June 15 reporting deadline for hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines
demonstrates that there is no compelling safety reason to receive such information for gas pipeline facilities by March 15.
To the extent that there is any benefit from PHMSA receiving annual report data a few months earlier, PHMSA does not agree
that it justifies the costs of complying with the March 15 deadline.

As recommended in the comments submitted by INGAA and ALLIUS, PHMSA also proposes to extend the NPMS information submission
deadline from March 15 to June 15 in § 191.29(b) for gas transmission and LNG facility operators. In addition to generating
the same cost savings from extending the reporting deadline described above, PHMSA and operators both compare annual report
and NPMS submissions as a quality control step. Submitting both together will likely improve the quality of both submissions
compared with the separate deadlines under the DFR. PHMSA notes this change is also consistent with the existing June 15 deadline
for submitting NPMS data for hazardous liquid pipelines in § 195.61(b).

Commenting Instructions: Please include the docket number PHMSA-2025-0108 at the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments by mail, submit
two copies. If you wish to receive confirmation that PHMSA received your comments, include a self-addressed stamped postcard.
Internet users may submit comments at https://www.regulations.gov.

Note:

Comments are posted without changes or edits to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. There is a privacy statement published on https://www.regulations.gov.

Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.dot.gov/privacy.

Confidential Business Information: Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated
as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure.
It is important that you clearly designate the comments submitted as CBI if: your comments responsive to this document contain
commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private; you actually treat such information as private;
and your comment is relevant or responsive to this notice. Pursuant to 49 CFR 190.343, you may ask PHMSA to provide confidential
treatment to information you give to the agency by taking the following steps: (1) mark each page of the original document
submission containing CBI as “Confidential;” (2) send PHMSA, along with the original document, a second copy of the original
document with the CBI deleted; and (3) explain why the information that you are submitting is CBI. Submissions containing
CBI should be sent to Sayler Palabrica, Office of Pipeline Safety Standards and Rulemaking Division, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 2nd Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, or by email at sayler.palabrica@dot.gov. Any materials PHMSA receives that is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the docket. Alternatively, you may review the documents in person at the street
address listed above.

II. Regulatory Analysis and Notices:

A. Legal Authority

This proposed rule is published under the authority of the Secretary of Transportation set forth in the Federal Pipeline Safety
Laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.) and delegated to the PHMSA Administrator pursuant to 49 CFR 1.97.

B. Statutory Requirement and Executive Order 12866

The Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. 60102(b)) require that PHMSA prepare a risk assessment that identifies the costs and benefits
associated with a proposed regulatory change. E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as implemented by DOT Order 2100.6B (“Policies and Procedures for Rulemaking”) and DOT Order 2100.7 (“Ensuring Reliance upon
Sound Economic Analysis in Department of Transportation Policies, Programs, and Activities”), requires agencies to regulate
in the “most cost-effective manner,” to make a “reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation justify
its costs,” and to develop regulations that “impose the least burden on society.” In arriving at those conclusions, E.O. 12866
requires that agencies should consider “both quantifiable measures . . . and qualitative measures of costs and benefits that
are difficult to quantify” and “maximize net benefits . . . unless a statute requires another regulatory approach.” E.O. 12866
also requires that “agencies should assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives, including the alternative
of not regulating.” DOT Order 2100.6B directs that PHMSA and other Operating Administrations must generally choose the “least
costly regulatory alternative that achieves the relevant objectives” unless required by law or compelling safety need. DOT
Order 2100.6B also specifies that regulations should generally “not be issued unless their benefits are expected to exceed
their costs” except where required by law or compelling safety need. DOT Order 2100.7 requires that “all rulemaking activities
shall be based on sound economic principles and analysis supported by rigorous cost-benefit requirement.”

E.O. 12866 and DOT Order 2100.6B also require that PHMSA submit “significant regulatory actions” to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Executive Office of the President's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
This final rule is a not significant regulatory action pursuant to E.O. 12866; OMB also has not designated this rule as a
“major rule” as defined by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.).

PHMSA has complied with the procedural and analytical requirements in E.O. 12866 as implemented by DOT Order 2100.6B and DOT
Order 2100.7, as well as the requirements in 49 U.S.C. 60102(b) and preliminarily determined

that this proposed rule will result in cost savings by reducing the need for operators of gas distribution, gas transmission,
gas gathering, underground natural gas storage facilities, and liquified natural gas plants to rely on contractors or overtime
to meet the current annual report submission deadline. As detailed in the accompanying Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis,
the proposed 3-month filing extension will result in cost savings of approximately $1 million per year. PHMSA expects these
cost savings may also result in reduced costs for the public to whom pipeline operators generally transfer a portion of their
compliance costs. PHMSA has also preliminarily determined that the proposed rule will not have any adverse safety effects
since annual reports about pipeline infrastructure are not urgently needed, unlike incident and accident data, to assess immediate
safety risks.

C. Executive Orders 14192 and 14219

This proposed rule, if finalized as proposed, is expected to be a deregulatory action pursuant to E.O. 14192, Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation. PHMSA estimates that the total costs of the NPRM on the regulated community will be less than zero. Nor does this rulemaking
implicate any of the factors identified in section 2(a) of E.O. 14219, Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's “Department of Government Efficiency” Deregulatory Initiative, indicative that a regulation is “unlawful . . . [or] that undermine[s] the national interest.”

D. Energy-Related Executive Orders 13211, 14154, and 14156

The President has declared in E.O. 14156, Declaring a National Energy Emergency, a National emergency to address America's inadequate energy development production, transportation, refining, and generation
capacity. Similarly, E.O. 14154, Unleashing American Energy, asserts a Federal policy to unleash American energy by ensuing access to abundant supplies of reliable, affordable energy
from (inter alia) the removal of “undue burden[s]” on the identification, development, or use of domestic energy resources
such as PHMSA-jurisdictional gases and hazardous liquids. PHMSA preliminarily finds this proposed rule is consistent with
each of E.O. 14156 and E.O. 14154. The proposed rule will give affected pipeline operators more time to submit annual reports
for gas pipeline and storage facilities subject to part 191, resulting in lower costs to operators.

However, this proposed rule is not a “significant energy action” under E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use, which requires Federal agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for any “significant energy action.” Because this
proposed rule is not a significant action under E.O. 12866, it will not have a significant adverse effect on supply, distribution,
or energy use.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

PHMSA analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in E.O. 13132, Federalism, and the Presidential Memorandum (“Preemption”) published in the
Federal Register
on May 22, 2009. E.O. 13132 requires agencies to assure meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development
of regulatory policies that may have “substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.”

Though the proposed rule may (when finalized) operate to preempt some State requirements, it would not impose any regulation
that has substantial direct effects on the States, the relationship between the National Government and the States, or the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Section 60104(c) of the Federal Pipeline
Safety Laws prohibits certain State safety regulation of interstate pipelines. Under the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws, States
that have submitted a current certification under section 60105(a) can augment Federal pipeline safety requirements for intrastate
pipelines regulated by PHMSA but may not approve safety requirements less stringent than those required by Federal law. A
State may also regulate an intrastate pipeline facility that PHMSA does not regulate. The preemptive effect of the regulatory
amendments in this proposed rule is limited to the minimum level necessary to achieve the objectives of the Federal Pipeline
Safety Laws. Therefore, the consultation and funding requirements of E.O. 13132 do not apply.

F. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires Federal agencies to conduct an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) for a proposed rule subject to notice-and-comment
rulemaking unless the agency head certifies that the rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. E.O. 13272, Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking, obliges agencies to establish procedures promoting compliance with the RFA. DOT posts its implementing guidance on a dedicated
web page. (4) PHMSA developed this proposed rule in accordance with E.O. 13272 and DOT implementing guidance to ensure compliance with the
RFA. The proposed rule is expected to reduce regulatory burdens by extending the deadline for operators to file annual reports.
Further, the changes proposed here are not expected to impose additional burdens on any operator. Therefore, PHMSA certifies
the proposed rule (if finalized) will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.

G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA, 2 U.S.C. §1501 et seq.) requires agencies to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, and the private
sector. For any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments, in the aggregate of $100 million or more in 1996 dollars ($203 million in 2024 dollars) in any given
year, the agency must prepare, amongst other things, a written statement that qualitatively and quantitatively assesses the
costs and benefits of the Federal mandate.

This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates under UMRA. PHMSA does not expect the proposed rule will result in costs
of $100 million or more (in 1996 dollars) per year for either State, local, or Tribal governments, or to the private sector.

H. National Environmental Policy Act

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires that Federal agencies assess and consider the impact of major Federal actions on the human and natural environment.

PHMSA analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with NEPA and issues this draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) because
it has preliminarily determined that the rulemaking will not adversely affect safety and therefore will not significantly
affect the quality of the human and natural environment. The

public is invited to comment on the impact of the proposed action.

I. Executive Order 13175

PHMSA analyzed this proposed rule according to the principles and criteria in E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, and DOT Order 5301.1A (“Department of Transportation Tribal Consultation Policies and Procedures”).
E.O. 13175 requires agencies to assure meaningful and timely input from Tribal government representatives in the development
of rules that significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities by imposing “substantial direct compliance costs” or “substantial
direct effects” on such communities or the relationship or distribution of power between the Federal Government and Tribes.

PHMSA assessed the impact of the proposed rule and determined that it will not significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities
or Indian Tribal governments. The rulemaking's regulatory amendments have a broad, national scope; therefore, this proposed
rule will not significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities, much less impose substantial compliance costs on Native
American Tribal governments or mandate Tribal action. For these reasons, PHMSA has concluded that the funding and consultation
requirements of E.O. 13175 and DOT Order 5301.1A do not apply.

J. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and its implementing regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d) requires that PHMSA provide interested members of the public and affected
agencies with an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping requests. Sections 191.11 and 191.17 require
operators of gas distribution pipelines, gas transmission pipelines, regulated gas gathering pipelines, Type R gas gathering
pipelines, UNGS facilities, and LNG facilities to submit an annual report to PHMSA by March 15 for the preceding calendar
year. PHMSA proposes to extend the annual report submission deadlines from March 15 to June 15 each calendar year in §§ 191.11
and 191.17.

Though PHMSA does not expect an increase in the burden on operators to comply, this adjustment will require a revision to
the instructions for the following forms:

PHMSA F 7100.1-1 Gas Distribution Annual Report;

PHMSA F 7100.2-1 Annual Report for Gas Transmission and Gas Gathering Pipeline Operators;

PHMSA F 7100.2-3 Annual Report for TYPE R (Reporting-Regulated) GAS GATHERING PIPELINE SYSTEMS;

PHMSA F7 100.3-1 Annual Report for Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities;

PHMSA F 7100.4-1 Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Annual Report.

PHMSA will submit the following information collection requests to OMB for approval based on the adjustments in this proposed
rule. These information collections are contained in part 191. The following information is provided for each information
collection: (1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB control number; (3) Current expiration date; (4) Type of request;
(5) Abstract of the information collection activity; (6) Description of affected public; (7) Estimate of total annual reporting
and recordkeeping burden; and (8) Frequency of collection. The information collections will be revised as follows:

  1. Title: Annual and Incident Reports for Gas Pipeline Operators.

OMB Control Number: 2137-0522.

Current Expiration Date: 8/31/2026.

Type of Request: Revision.

Abstract: This mandatory information collection covers the collection of data from operators of natural gas pipelines, underground natural
gas storage facilities, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities for annual reports. Section 191.17 requires operators of
underground natural gas storage facilities, gas transmission systems, and gas gathering systems to submit an annual report
by June 15 for the preceding calendar year.

Affected Public: Operators of natural, and other, gas transmission pipelines, gas gathering pipelines, underground natural gas storage facilities,
and liquefied natural gas facilities.

Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:

Estimated Number of Responses: 2,445.

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 104,596.

Frequency of Collection: Annually.

  1. Title: Annual Report for Gas Distribution Pipeline Operators.

OMB Control Number: 2137-0629.

Current Expiration Date: 06/30/2026.

Type of Request: Revision.

Abstract: This information collection request requires operators of gas distribution pipeline systems to submit annual report data to
the Office of Pipeline Safety in accordance with the regulations stipulated in part 191 by way of form PHMSA F 7100.1-1. The
form is to be submitted once for each calendar year, by June 15, for the preceding calendar year. The annual report form collects
data about the pipe material, size, and age. The form also collects data on leaks from these systems as well as excavation
damages. PHMSA uses the information to track the extent of gas distribution systems and normalize incident and leak rates.

Affected Public: Operators of gas distribution pipeline systems.

Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:

Estimated Number of Responses: 1,446.

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 28,920.

Frequency of Collection: Annually.

Requests for copies of this information collection should be directed to Angela Hill at angela.hill@dot.gov. Comments are invited on:

(a) The need for the proposed collection of information for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;

(b) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the revised collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;

(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques.

Send comments directly to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: Desk Officer
for the Department of Transportation, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. Comments should be submitted on or prior to
June 23, 2026.

K. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis

E.O. 13609, Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation, requires agencies to consider whether the impacts associated with significant variations between domestic and international
regulatory approaches are unnecessary or may impair the ability of American business to export and compete internationally.
In meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues, international regulatory
cooperation can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that are or would be adopted in

the absence of such cooperation. International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences
in regulatory requirements.

Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465),
prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles
to the foreign commerce of the United States. For purposes of these requirements, Federal agencies may participate in the
establishment of international standards, so long as the standards have a legitimate domestic objective, such as providing
for safety, and do not operate to exclude imports that meet this objective. The statute also requires consideration of international
standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards.

PHMSA engages with international standards setting bodies to protect the safety of the American public. PHMSA has assessed
the effects of the proposed rule and has determined that its proposed regulatory amendments will not cause unnecessary obstacles
to foreign trade.

L. Cybersecurity and Executive Order 14028

E.O. 14028, Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity, directs the Federal Government to improve its efforts to identify, deter, and respond to “persistent and increasingly sophisticated
malicious cyber campaigns.” PHMSA has considered the effects of the proposed rule and has determined that its proposed regulatory
amendments would not materially affect the cybersecurity risk profile for pipeline facilities.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 191

Pipeline safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

In consideration of the foregoing, PHMSA proposes to amend 49 CFR part 191 as follows:

PART 191—TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL, INCIDENT, AND OTHER REPORTING

  1. The authority citation for part 191 continues to read as follows:

Authority:

30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5121, 60101 et seq., and 49 CFR 1.97.

§ 191.11 [AMENDED] 2. In § 191.11, remove the word “March” and add in its place the word “June”.

§ 191.17 [AMENDED] 3. In § 191.17(a)(1), (a)(2), (b), and (c) remove the phrase “March 15” and add in its place the phrase “June 15”.

§ 191.29 [AMENDED] 4. In § 191.29(b), remove the phrase “March 15” and add in its place the phrase “June 15”.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 22, 2026, under the authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.97. Paul J. Roberti, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2026-08081 Filed 4-23-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-60-P

Footnotes

(1) INGAA, “Comment on Pipeline Safety: Annual Report Filing Timelines” (Sep 3, 2025), https://www.regulations.gov/comment/PHMSA-2025-0108-0003.

(2) Air Liquide Large Industries, “Comment on Pipeline Safety: Annual Report Filing Timelines” (Aug 29, 2025), https://www.regulations.gov/comment/PHMSA-2025-0108-0002.

(3) EDF, “Comment on Pipeline Safety: Annual Report Filing Timelines” (Sept 3, 2025), https://www.regulations.gov/comment/PHMSA-2025-0108-0004.

(4) DOT, Rulemaking Requirements Concerning Small Entities, https://www.transportation.gov/regulations/rulemaking-requirements-concerning-small-entities.

Download File

Download

CFR references

49 CFR 191.11 49 CFR 191.17 49 CFR 191.29 49 CFR 195.49 49 CFR 195.61

Named provisions

Annual Reports for Gas Pipelines Annual Reports for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines National Pipeline Mapping System

Get daily alerts for Regs.gov: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from PHMSA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
PHMSA
Comment period closes
June 23rd, 2026 (58 days)
Instrument
Consultation
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Proposed
Change scope
Minor
Docket
PHMSA-2025-0108

Who this affects

Applies to
Energy companies Transportation companies
Industry sector
2111 Oil & Gas Extraction
Activity scope
Pipeline annual reporting Geospatial data submission Pipeline safety compliance
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Transportation
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Energy Environmental Protection

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Regs.gov: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!