Search

C.M. Appeal Fails, Parental Rights Terminated

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the Circuit Court of Kanawha County's order terminating mother C.M.'s parental rights to J.P.-1 and J.P.-2. The court rejected C.M.'s arguments that the circuit court erred in failing to determine whether she was a 'battered parent' at adjudication and in finding aggravated circumstances justifying termination of her rights. The petition arose after the children were hospitalized with severe non-accidental injuries in November 2023.

C.M.04 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

C.M.04 filed a civil diversity case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, and Uber Technologies, Inc. on April 16, 2026. The complaint, filed with a $405 filing fee, raises personal injury and product liability claims. The case is in its earliest stage with only a proposed summons and certificate of interested entities filed alongside the initial complaint.

In The Matter Of The Parental Rights To I.C.M.M.

The Washington Court of Appeals Division I filed a parental rights case opinion (Docket No. 87655-4) on April 6, 2026. The matter involves the parental rights to I.C.M.M., with judgment under review from December 16, 2025. The three-judge panel (Diaz, Bui, Coburn) issued the opinion, with Judge Helson having presided over the underlying dependency proceedings. Counsel appeared for appellant parents, the State Attorney General's Office (Social & Health Services), and guardian ad litems through the King County Dependency CASA Program.

Termination of Parental Rights Affirmed, Racial Bias Claim Fails

The Washington Court of Appeals, Division One, affirmed the termination of Mr. M.'s parental rights to his daughter I.C.M.M., rejecting his claims that the decision improperly relied on racial/ethnic bias and that DCYF failed to provide statutorily required services under RCW 13.34.180(1). The superior court had terminated parental rights in December 2024 after finding parental deficiencies including inability to protect the child from abuse and inappropriate physical discipline.

In re Parental Rights Termination - Racial Bias Claim Fails

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One, affirmed a superior court decision terminating Mr. M.'s parental rights to his biological daughter I.C.M.M. The court rejected Mr. M.'s claims that the termination decision improperly relied on his race and ethnicity and that the Department of Children, Youth, and Families failed to provide required services under RCW 13.34.180(1). The underlying case arose from child removal in March 2019 following criminal charges against both parents for abuse.

Mahi Enterprises vs State By - Interim Custody of Funds

The Karnataka High Court has issued an order regarding the interim custody of Rs. 1,12,15,884/- in the case of M/S Mahi Enterprises vs. State By. The court's decision addresses the quashing of lower court orders and directs the police to de-freeze the petitioner's account.

In re C. C. M. Baskin Minor - Termination of Parental Rights

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's order terminating parental rights for a minor, citing grounds including physical harm to a child and failure to provide proper care. The case involved a fatal car accident where the child was ejected due to lack of restraint.

Doe v. Lyft, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Doe v. Lyft, Inc., was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and falls under the category of Personal Injury: Other.