Searching in State Courts · Search everything

2,529 changes

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Woodhouse v. State Bar of Cal. - Vexatious Litigant Ruling

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's finding that Benjamin Woodhouse is a vexatious litigant. The court held his complaint lacked merit and affirmed orders barring him from future self-represented suits without pre-filing approval and security. This ruling impacts Woodhouse's ability to file future lawsuits.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Ribstein v. Marx - Civil Harassment Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed an order granting a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) against the appellant. The case involves allegations of fraud and a subsequent petition for a CHRO.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Ortega - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Two, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Ortega. The court affirmed the judgments and sentences of defendants Daniel Ortega, Alfonso Keer, and Jaime Chacon, who were convicted of murder.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Sims - Criminal Convictions Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed in part and modified a criminal judgment for Kyle Richard Sims. The court found the evidence insufficient for certain aggravating circumstances related to drug quantities but otherwise upheld the jury's verdicts. The judgment was modified regarding sentencing terms and conduct credits.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Pomona Valley Hospital Med. Center v. Kaiser Foundation - Medical Reimbursement Dispute

The California Court of Appeal reversed in part and remanded a judgment concerning a medical reimbursement dispute between Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan. The case involves approximately $66 million in asserted unreimbursed emergency medical services provided by the hospital to Kaiser members.

Priority review Enforcement Healthcare
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Raubitschek v. County of Los Angeles - Premises Liability Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's summary judgment for the County of Los Angeles in a premises liability case. The court found the sidewalk defect was trivial and could not support liability, affirming the non-precedential opinion.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Montoya - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One, issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Montoya. The court affirmed the judgment, finding no arguable issues after an independent review of the record.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Mercado - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of People v. Mercado, concerning a criminal conviction for attempted murder and assault with a firearm. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case with directions. The appeal addressed jury instructions, prosecutorial misconduct, and cumulative error.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Rogers - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of People v. Rogers. This document is a non-precedential opinion related to a specific legal case. The court has not identified any known citations or subsequent legal actions directly related to this opinion.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Hicks v. City of Albany - Negligence Action

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision to dismiss a negligence action filed by Edwin Hicks against the City of Albany. The dismissal was based on insufficient ante litem notice provided by Hicks regarding his injuries sustained from a stormwater drainage lid. The court found the notice did not adequately describe the alleged negligence.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 2201–2210 of 2,529 changes

1 219 220 221 222 223 253

Get alerts for ""

We'll email you when new changes match this search.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.