Changeflow GovPing Pharma & Healthcare PD-1 Plus Lenvatinib vs Regorafenib for Unresec...
Routine Notice Added Final

PD-1 Plus Lenvatinib vs Regorafenib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Favicon for changeflow.com ClinicalTrials.gov Studies
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registered a new Phase 2/3 clinical trial (NCT07537985) comparing the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor combined with Lenvatinib versus PD-1 inhibitor combined with Regorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UHCC) after failure of first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus sintilimab. The study aims to provide evidence-based guidance for selecting optimal second-line treatment regimens. Estimated enrollment and completion date are listed in the registry.

Published by NIH on changeflow.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

This document is a ClinicalTrials.gov study registration entry for NCT07537985, a new clinical trial evaluating PD-1 inhibitor combination therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients who have progressed after first-line bevacizumab plus sintilimab treatment. The trial compares two treatment arms: PD-1 inhibitor with Lenvatinib versus PD-1 inhibitor with Regorafenib, assessing both efficacy and safety as second-line options.

For clinical investigators and healthcare providers, this registry entry indicates an upcoming Phase 2/3 study in the hepatocellular carcinoma treatment landscape. Patients meeting eligibility criteria may benefit from enrollment, and the results may inform future treatment guidelines for second-line therapy selection in advanced liver cancer.

Archived snapshot

Apr 18, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

← ClinicalTrials.gov Studies

Efficacy and Safety Comparison Between PD-1 Inhibitor Combined With Lenvatinib or With Regorafenib For UHCC After Failure of First-line Treatment

N/A NCT07537985 Kind: NA Apr 17, 2026

Abstract

There is no definitive evidence regarding the therapeutic efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after disease progression following first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus sintilimab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There is insufficient evidence to support which TKI should be combined with PD-1 inhibitors as the optimal second-line treatment option after first-line therapy failure. Data on the application of lenvatinib as a second-line treatment are limited, whereas the efficacy and safety of regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitors have been preliminarily validated [9]. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with either lenvatinib or regorafenib after disease progression following first-line bevacizumab plus sintilimab treatment for unresectable HCC, providing evidence-based guidance for the selection of second-line treatment regimens in clinical practice.

Conditions: Hepatocellulcar Carcinoma

Interventions: Lenvatinib, Regorafenib, PD-1 Inhibitor

View original document →

Get daily alerts for ClinicalTrials.gov Studies

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NIH.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
NIH
Published
April 17th, 2024
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
NCT07537985
Docket
NCT07537985

Who this affects

Applies to
Clinical investigators Healthcare providers Pharmaceutical companies
Industry sector
6211 Healthcare Providers 3254 Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Activity scope
Clinical trial registration Oncology drug study Comparative efficacy study
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Healthcare
Operational domain
Clinical Operations
Topics
Pharmaceuticals Clinical Operations

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when ClinicalTrials.gov Studies publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!