Changeflow GovPing US Courts

Recent changes

1mo ago 9th Circuit Opinions
Favicon for www.ca9.uscourts.gov

USA v. Ho-Romero - Criminal Case Sentencing Vacated

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the sentence of David Ho-Romero and remanded for resentencing. The court found that the district court erred by applying an obstruction of justice enhancement without making a finding of intent. The case involved a guilty plea to methamphetamine importation.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
1mo ago 1st Circuit Opinions
Favicon for www.ca1.uscourts.gov

United States v. Rowell - Sex Trafficking Conviction Appeal

The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Keion Rowell for sex trafficking of a minor. Rowell appealed his conviction, challenging the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, a claim of structural error regarding courtroom sealing, the admission of certain statements, and procedural issues with alternate jurors. The court rejected all of Rowell's arguments.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
1mo ago 1st Circuit Opinions
Favicon for www.ca1.uscourts.gov

Khanal v. Bondi - Immigration Appeal

The First Circuit Court of Appeals vacated an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that dismissed a petition for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. The court found that the BIA failed to consider crucial documentary and testimonial evidence and applied an incorrect legal standard.

Priority review Enforcement Immigration
1mo ago 1st Circuit Opinions
Favicon for www.ca1.uscourts.gov

Cante Mijangos v. Bondi - Immigration Asylum Petition Review

The First Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Cante Mijangos v. Bondi. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish the required nexus between her abuse and her protected status for asylum, affirming the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial.

Priority review Enforcement Immigration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Roe CL 280 v. Uber Technologies - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, Roe CL 280 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed on February 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Sherif v. an Illinois Corporation - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Sherif v. an Illinois Corporation, was filed on February 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a personal injury claim and names Walgreen Co. as a defendant. The initial filings include the complaint and proposed summons.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Babbini et al v. ID5 Technology, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Babbini et al v. ID5 Technology, Inc., was filed on February 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint and proposed summons, initiating litigation against ID5 Technology, Inc.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Cooper v. Aramark Food Co. - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Cooper v. Aramark Food Co. et al., was filed on February 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint filed by Elijah Cooper against Aramark Food Co. and the San Francisco Sheriff Dept. under Federal Question jurisdiction.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Fletcher v. Walmart Inc. - Civil Case Filing

Walmart Inc. filed a Notice of Removal on February 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 5:26-cv-01422. This action moves a previously filed state court case to federal jurisdiction. A scheduling order has been issued with initial deadlines.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Jones v. Mendocino County - Habeas Corpus

A new civil case, Jones v. Mendocino County, was filed on February 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. A notice was issued regarding the completion of the In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 6501–6510 of 6,790 changes

1 649 650 651 652 653 679

Get US Courts alerts

Daily digest of regulatory changes. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get US Courts alerts

We'll email you when new US Courts regulatory changes are detected.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.