Housing Ombudsman Compensation Guidance

UK Housing Ombudsman News

Published April 1st, 2026

Detected March 24th, 2026

Summary

The UK Housing Ombudsman has released new compensation guidance, effective April 1, 2026, to promote a consistent and fair approach to compensation awards across the sector. The guidance aims to clarify expectations for landlords and residents, drawing on engagement with both parties and analysis of past maladministration cases.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The UK Housing Ombudsman has issued new compensation guidance, effective April 1, 2026, designed to standardize fair compensation awards for housing-related service failures. This guidance follows a review of 'severe maladministration' cases and aims to ensure landlords correctly apply their own compensation policies, offer appropriate awards at earlier stages, and align their offers with the Ombudsman's determinations, which are intended to restore residents to their rightful position rather than serve as punitive fines.

Housing providers must review and update their internal compensation policies and practices to align with the principles outlined in the new guidance by the April 1, 2026, effective date. Failure to do so may result in increased scrutiny from the Ombudsman and potentially higher compensation orders. The guidance emphasizes that fair compensation, alongside non-financial orders like apologies, is crucial for restoring resident trust and preventing complaints from escalating.

What to do next

Review and update internal compensation policies to align with the new guidance.
Train relevant staff on the principles of fair compensation as outlined by the Ombudsman.
Ensure compensation awards are consistent with the Ombudsman's guidance and previous orders.

Source document (simplified)

News Press releases

Housing Ombudsman calls for ‘single vision of fair compensation’ across the sector

3 February 2026

We have released our latest ‘learning from severe maladministration’ report. The report focuses on compensation awards.

It is accompanied by new compensation guidance setting out the key principles for a fair approach to compensation, make clear expectations and encourage consistency. This guidance will be effective from 1 April 2026.

We engaged with landlords and residents to produce this guidance. We spoke to landlords about their experiences through our landlord forums. We took residents comments from our Resident Panel and our casework to feed into the final document.

The report is split into 3 sections. The first looks at landlords’ not applying their own compensation policies correctly. In this section we see a landlord failing to offer compensation despite a resident and her 4 year old child living in damp and mould for 3 years.

The second section looks at when landlords increase the compensation after its stage 2 response. This misses the opportunity to put things right for the resident at an earlier stage. One landlord offered over £2,000 more in compensation when the complaint was referred to us.

The final section examined the difference between our orders and the landlord’s offer. Sometimes the difference was significant. For example, we offered 10 times the compensation to a resident living with a leak for years because the landlord’s award was so low.

In each case, our compensation is not punitive or regulatory fine but seeks to put residents back in the position they would’ve been had service failings not happened.

Learning from severe maladministration report

Compensation guidance

The landlords mentioned in this report are:

Basildon Council
Clarion
Cornwall Council
Freebridge Community Housing
Hexagon Housing Association
Home Group
Hyde Housing Association
Karibu Community Homes
L&Q
London Borough of Haringey
London Borough of Kingston
London Borough of Lambeth
London Borough of Southwark
Peabody
Riverside
Stonewater Richard Blakeway, Housing Ombudsman, said: “Compensation is emotive.

“ When times are hard and budgets tight, for both residents and landlords, this can drive the wrong behaviours. It can result in residents expecting unrealistic redress for failings. Or organisations being institutionally reluctant to compensate.

“There should be a single vision of fair compensation shared across the sector.

“At the heart of compensation is fairness. Individual circumstances will lead to different awards but the core principles driving decision-making should be common.

“N on-financial orders, like apologies, matter greatly too. But fair compensation can go a substantial way towards restoring trust amongst residents and prevent complaints escalating to us.

“A virtuous cycle of improving complaint handling and proactive learning to prevent complaints will longer-term also reduce the need for compensation.”