Changeflow GovPing Healthcare Sixth Circuit Holds Tennessee PBM Network and S...
Routine Notice Amended Final

Sixth Circuit Holds Tennessee PBM Network and Steering Rules Are ERISA-Preempted

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Healthcare
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

The Sixth Circuit held that Tennessee's PBM laws requiring any-willing-pharmacy access and prohibiting differential copays and steering incentives are ERISA-preempted as applied to self-funded ERISA plans. The court found these laws impermissibly dictate plan structure and administration rather than merely regulating costs. The ruling establishes that employers sponsoring self-funded ERISA plans and their PBMs cannot be compelled to include all willing pharmacies or prohibited from tiered cost-sharing.

Published by Troutman Pepper Locke on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The Sixth Circuit held that two Tennessee PBM laws are preempted by ERISA as applied to self-funded plans. The any-willing-provider provisions require PBMs and covered entities to admit any licensed pharmacy willing to accept network terms, including in preferred networks. The incentive/steering provisions prohibit higher copays, fees, or penalties when members use certain in-network pharmacies and ban financial incentives to steer members to PBM-owned pharmacies. The court found both provisions have an impermissible connection with ERISA plans because they mandate benefit structures and dictate plan choices rather than merely regulating costs.

Employers sponsoring self-funded ERISA plans and their PBMs benefit from this ruling as it protects their ability to design pharmacy networks and cost-sharing structures without state mandates. Plan fiduciaries may challenge state PBM regulations before facing enforcement actions. The ruling does not affect state authority to regulate PBM reimbursement rates. The decision applies to the Sixth Circuit states (Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee) but may influence other circuits.

Named provisions

ERISA Preemption Saving Clause Deemer Clause Any-Willing-Provider Provisions Incentive and Steering Provisions

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Healthcare

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Troutman Pepper Locke.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Troutman Pepper Locke
Published
April 17th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
McKee Foods Corp. v. BFP

Who this affects

Applies to
Employers Healthcare providers Pharmaceutical companies
Industry sector
5242 Health Insurance
Activity scope
ERISA plan administration Pharmacy benefit management Healthcare benefits
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Healthcare
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Pharmaceuticals Employment & Labor Insurance

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Healthcare publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!