DOJ Sues NYPH Hospital for Antitrust Violations
Summary
The DOJ filed an antitrust lawsuit against The New York and Presbyterian Hospital on March 26, 2026, alleging the hospital used its Manhattan market power to force payors into favorable contractual terms that harmed patients and employers. The complaint closely follows a template used in a similar February 2026 lawsuit against OhioHealth, with approximately half of the 60 paragraphs being nearly identical. The NYPH lawsuit differs in that it does not include state law claims (the NY State AG did not join) but contains more documented evidence suggesting the DOJ has incriminating emails from NYPH representatives.
What changed
This JD Supra article summarizes the DOJ's antitrust lawsuit against New York and Presbyterian Hospital, alleging the hospital used dominant market power in Manhattan to restrict payors from offering alternative plans, reduce competition, and force higher prices for inpatient acute care services. The complaint follows a template similar to the OhioHealth lawsuit filed February 20, 2026, with two notable differences: no NY State AG participation and more documented evidence in the form of quoted statements from NYPH representatives.\n\nHealthcare providers and hospital systems operating in concentrated markets should monitor this enforcement pattern. The DOJ's approach reflects a broader strategy seen in the 2016 Carolinas Health System case, which resulted in a 2019 settlement requiring contract modifications. Hospitals with significant market share in defined geographic areas face increased scrutiny regarding payor contracting practices and any language that may restrict patient steering or plan options.
Archived snapshot
Apr 17, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
April 17, 2026
Copy and Paste – New York & Presbyterian Complaint follows OhioHealth Template
James F. Flynn Bricker Graydon Wyatt LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed
Five weeks after filing a nearly identical lawsuit in a Columbus federal court, the same United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) attorneys filed a lawsuit in a New York City federal court against The New York and Presbyterian Hospital (“NYPH”). On March 26, 2026, the DOJ sued NYPH for using its Manhattan-based market power to force payors to agree to favorable contractual terms to the alleged detriment of patients and employers. A similar lawsuit was filed on February 20 against OhioHealth (see prior Friction Point article: OhioHealth Sued by DOJ and State of Ohio for Market Power and Contracting Practices).
At least half of the approximately 60 paragraphs in each complaint are nearly identical. In both complaints, the DOJ alleges that either NYPH or OhioHealth:
- Possess dominant market power in their defined geographic markets;
- Uses its market power to restrict payors from offering alternative plans and provider choices;
- Reduce competition and force patients and employers to pay higher prices for inpatient general acute care hospital services; and
- Violate federal antitrust laws. There are two notable differences with the NYPH lawsuit. Unlike the OhioHealth suit, the DOJ was not joined in the action by the State Attorney General from New York. As a result, the claims against NYPH do not include state law-based claims. Second, the NYPH lawsuit contains more quoted statements attributed to representatives of NYPH, suggesting that the DOJ possesses more incriminating e-mails or documented evidence of incriminating anti-competitive statements.
The DOJ’s playbook goes farther back than earlier this year, however. The OhioHealth and NYPH lawsuits are also very similar to an action filed by the DOJ and the North Carolina Attorney General in 2016 against The Carolinas Health System. In fact, two of the attorneys representing the DOJ in 2016 are also counsel of record in both the OhioHealth and NYPH actions. That action ultimately resulted in an agreed judgment between the parties whereby the Carolinas Health System agreed to void certain payor contract language pertaining to steering patients to Carolinas facilities and to forgo requirements of being in a preferred status within payor plan options. The settlement was reached in 2019 after three years of discovery and litigation.
In all three cases, the DOJ’s actions seek to protect the interests – and profits – of highly-profitable private insurance companies to the detriment of non-profit health systems.
[View source.]
;) ;) Report
Related Posts
Latest Posts
- [Ongoing Program] Level 2 Title IX Informal Resolution Training - May 1st, 2:00 pm - 5:00 pm ET
- Copy and Paste – New York & Presbyterian Complaint follows OhioHealth Template
- [Hybrid Event] 18th Annual Construction Procurement Seminar for Public Entities in Ohio - May 14th, Dublin, OH
- [Event] The 2026 Workplace HR Update: Navigating Compliance, Benefits, and Immigration - May 13th, West Chester, OH See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Bricker Graydon Wyatt LLP
Written by:
Bricker Graydon Wyatt LLP Contact + Follow James F. Flynn + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Antitrust Litigation + Follow Antitrust Violations + Follow Competition + Follow Department of Justice (DOJ) + Follow Enforcement Actions + Follow Health Care Providers + Follow Health Insurance + Follow Healthcare Facilities + Follow Hospitals + Follow Market Power + Follow Payor Contracts + Follow Antitrust & Trade Regulation + Follow Health + Follow more less
Bricker Graydon Wyatt LLP on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Related changes
Get daily alerts for JD Supra Healthcare
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Bricker Graydon Wyatt.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Healthcare publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.