Changeflow GovPing Healthcare & Life Sciences State AI Healthcare and Chatbot Laws: April 202...
Routine Notice Added Final

State AI Healthcare and Chatbot Laws: April 2026 Legislative Update

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Healthcare
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

Troutman Pepper Locke published its 14th weekly tracking update on proposed state AI legislation for 2026. Nebraska enacted the Conversational AI Safety Act (signed April 14) and Maine enacted LD 2082 prohibiting unlicensed AI-delivered therapy or psychotherapy services (signed April 13). Multiple bills advanced in Iowa, Tennessee, Hawaii, Oklahoma, California, Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, and Rhode Island, covering chatbots, AI pricing, provenance disclosures, employment, health, and personhood.

Why this matters

Organizations deploying AI in healthcare or consumer-facing chatbot applications should inventory their state-by-state exposure given this rapid proliferation of state AI laws. Companies operating in Nebraska should assess compliance requirements under LB 525 (Conversational AI Safety Act), while healthcare organizations in Maine must ensure AI-delivered therapy or psychotherapy services are provided only by licensed professionals.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by Troutman Pepper Locke on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

This JD Supra article summarizes state-level AI legislative activity through April 20, 2026. Nebraska's Conversational AI Safety Act (LB 525) and Maine's AI therapy prohibition (LD 2082) represent enacted laws affecting AI developers, deployers, and healthcare providers. The article tracks bill movements across nine additional states including Iowa, Tennessee, Hawaii, Oklahoma, California, Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, and Rhode Island, covering chatbot regulation, healthcare AI, AI pricing transparency, provenance disclosures, employment AI, and AI personhood.

Affected parties include AI developers and deployers operating in healthcare settings, companies using chatbots for customer service or companion functions, organizations using AI for price-setting, and employers using AI in hiring or workplace decisions. The patchwork of state laws creates compliance complexity for organizations operating across state lines, as requirements vary significantly by jurisdiction. Organizations deploying AI in healthcare or consumer-facing applications should monitor legislative developments in states where they operate.

Archived snapshot

Apr 21, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 20, 2026

Proposed State AI Law Update: April 20, 2026

David Stauss Troutman Pepper Locke + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed

Key point: Nebraska (chatbot) and Maine (health) enacted laws last week, while more than a dozen bills advanced in other states.

Below is the 14th update on the status of proposed state AI legislation in 2026. These posts track state AI bills that can directly or indirectly affect private-sector AI developers and deployers. These posts do not track AI bills that focus on government use of AI; insurance; workgroups; education; legal settings; name, image, and likeness; deepfakes; CSAM and sexual material; and election interference. As always, the contents provided below are time-sensitive and subject to change.

What’s New

Nebraska became the fourth state to enact a chatbot law this year when Governor Jim Pillen signed the Conversational AI Safety Act into law. Meanwhile, Maine Governor Janet Mills signed a bill into law that prohibits any person from providing, advertising, or otherwise offering therapy or psychotherapy services, including through the use of AI, to the public unless the services are provided by a licensed professional.

In other chatbot news, Iowa inched closer to passing a chatbot bill with the House sending an amended bill back to the Senate for concurrence. Tennessee’s Senate passed a bill. Two bills in Hawaii crossed chambers with the House and Senate unable to agree on language. Two Oklahoma bills that previously passed out of their chamber of origin advanced out of opposite chamber committees. In California, two chatbot bills advanced out of committee.

California committees also advanced pricing, disclosure, employment, and health bills last week.

Turning to provenance bills, Arizona is close to becoming the third state — after Utah and Washington — to pass a bill this year. The Arizona House sent an amended bill back to the Senate for concurrence.

In other health care related bill news, bills passed the Colorado, Louisiana, and Rhode Island Houses.

Finally, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis called a special session of the Florida legislature. Among other topics, the proclamation asked the legislature to consider DeSantis’ AI Bill of Rights. That bill passed the Senate during the regular session but was not taken up in the House.

More details on those bills plus updates on all bill movements last week, are included in the post below.

High Risk / Consequential Decisions

These bills regulate AI in high-risk situations, such as financial services or health care and can require disclosures, assessments, and consumer rights.

There were no updates for this category last week.

Chatbot

These bills come in different varieties but, in general, they regulate AI interacting directly with individuals. For example, chatbots that act as companions or interact with individuals in a commercial or health care setting.

Nebraska’s chatbot bill (LB 525) was signed into law on April 14.

Iowa’s chatbot bill (SF 2417) passed the House and was sent back to the Senate for concurrence.

Tennessee’s SB 1700 passed the Senate.

In Hawaii, HB 1782 passed the Senate as amended. The House subsequently disagreed with the amendment and sent the bill back to the Senate. Conversely, SB 3001 passed the House as amended. The Senate subsequently disagreed with the amendment and sent the bill back to the House.

In Oklahoma, SB 1521 and HB 3544 were both reported as “do pass” in committees. Both bills previously passed their chamber of origin.

California’s AB 1988 unanimously passed out of the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee as amended. The bill amends California’s existing chatbot law. AB 1609 passed out of the same committee by a 9-4 vote. The bill regulates customer service chatbots.

Pricing

These bills deal with the use of AI to set prices and in some cases deal with employment.

California’s AB 2564 (surveillance pricing) passed out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee.

Disclosures

These bills generally require organizations to identify when content is generated by AI or otherwise make disclosures regarding the use of GenAI.

California’s SB 1000 passed out of a Senate committee. The bill amends the California AI Transparency Act.

Meanwhile, an Ohio lawmaker filed a watermarking bill (HB 813).

Provenance

These bills require entities to make disclosures regarding the data used to train AI.

Arizona’s SB 1786 passed the House as amended and was sent back to the Senate for concurrence.

Employment

These bills regulate the use of AI in employment settings such as hiring, firing, promotion, compensation, or displacement issues.

California’s AB 1883 (workplace surveillance tools) passed out of the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee.

Health

These bills focus on the use of AI in health care.

Maine’s LD 2082 was signed into law on April 13. The law prohibits any person from providing, advertising, or otherwise offering therapy or psychotherapy services, including through the use of AI, to the public unless the services are provided by a licensed professional.

Colorado’s HB 1195 (use of AI in psychotherapy services) passed the House.

Louisiana’s HB 475 passed the House. The bill requires a health care provider to verbally notify patients prior to recording a visit to be transcribed by AI.

Rhode Island’s HB 7538 passed the House. The bill requires health care providers and health care facilities to inform patients of the use of AI to memorialize patient visits.

California’s SB 903 (mental health professionals) passed out of a Senate committee while SB 1146 (advertisement claims: health-related consumer products and services: digital replicas and synthetic performers) passed through a second Senate committee.

Personhood

These bills generally provide that AI cannot be granted legal status or deemed a person under state law.

Tennessee’s SB 837 passed the legislature. Oklahoma’s HB 3546, which previously passed the House, was reported as “do pass” out of a Senate committee.

AI Bill of Rights

These bills cover multiple issues such as chatbots and providing individuals with rights relating to AI.

On April 15, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued a proclamation calling a special session of the Florida legislature to begin April 28 and last until May 1. Among other topics, the legislature is asked to consider DeSantis’ AI Bill of Rights. That bill passed the Senate during the regular session but was not taken up in the House.

Frontier Models

These bills apply to frontier models and the bills commonly apply only to global-scale tech corporations.

There were no updates for this category last week.

;) ;) Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Troutman Pepper Locke

Written by:

Troutman Pepper Locke Contact + Follow David Stauss + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Artificial Intelligence + Follow Bots + Follow Corporate Counsel + Follow Deep Fake + Follow Disclosure Requirements + Follow Healthcare + Follow Information Technology + Follow New Legislation + Follow Proposed Legislation + Follow Regulatory Reform + Follow Regulatory Requirements + Follow State Legislatures + Follow Consumer Protection + Follow Health + Follow Privacy + Follow Science, Computers & Technology + Follow more less

Troutman Pepper Locke on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Healthcare

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Troutman Pepper Locke.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Troutman Pepper Locke
Published
April 20th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Technology companies Healthcare providers
Industry sector
5112 Software & Technology
Activity scope
AI legislation tracking State regulatory compliance
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Artificial Intelligence
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Healthcare Consumer Protection

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Healthcare publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!