Oregon Seeks $2.25M in Kroger Attorneys' Fees for Blocked Merger
Summary
Oregon, leading a nine-state coalition, filed a $10.3 million attorneys' fee petition against Kroger on April 1, 2026, seeking to recover litigation costs after helping block Kroger's proposed $25 billion merger with Albertsons. Oregon's share totals $2,251,375 — $1,806,287 in fees plus $445,088 in expenses — following a February 27, 2026 court ruling that the states prevailed in FTC et al. v. Kroger. The coalition includes Arizona, California, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, and Wyoming. The proposed merger would have combined two of the largest grocery chains in the United States, eliminating competition in hundreds of communities, with economists and consumer advocates warning of higher prices, reduced wages, and fewer stores.
About this source
GovPing monitors Oregon AG News & Media Releases for new government general regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 17 changes logged to date.
What changed
Oregon, leading a nine-state coalition, filed an attorneys' fee petition totaling approximately $10.3 million against Kroger on April 1, 2026. Oregon's specific share is $2,251,375 ($1,806,287 in fees plus $445,088 in expenses), reflecting the state's investment in litigation that blocked the $25 billion Kroger-Albertsons merger. A February 27, 2026 court ruling found that the states prevailed in FTC et al. v. Kroger and are entitled to recover their legal costs.\n\nGrocery retailers and companies considering large mergers should note that state attorneys general are actively filling gaps left by retreating federal antitrust enforcement. When states win these fights, they can shift the cost of litigation back to the corporations involved — making it financially riskier for companies to pursue mergers that regulators challenge.
Archived snapshot
Apr 2, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
News & Media Releases
- Media Releases
- #### Search by Keyword
- #### Filter by News Category
OCPA Privacy Law Hate and Bias Crimes Voting and Elections
- #### View Prior News
- From:
- To:
Attorney General Rayfield Makes Kroger Pay for the Fight – And Sends a Message to Monopoly-Minded Corporations
April 1, 2026 • Posted in Homepage, Media Release
Oregon leads nine-state coalition in filing $10.3 million fee petition showing states will hold the line where federal enforcers won’t
Attorney General Dan Rayfield today announced that Oregon is seeking more than $2.25 million in attorneys’ fees and costs from Kroger after the state helped block the grocery giant’s proposed $25 billion merger with Albertsons. Oregon led eight other states in filing a fee petition totaling approximately $10.3 million – money the states are entitled to recover after a court ruled they prevailed in the landmark antitrust case.
“When federal enforcers step back, states step up,” said Attorney General Rayfield. “Recovering attorneys’ fees is one way Oregon can sustain that work – making it clear to corporations that when they push deals that harm consumers, they will be held accountable, and Oregon taxpayers won’t be left to foot the bill.”
This follows a February 27, 2026 court decision finding that the states had prevailed in FTC et al. v. Kroger and were entitled to recover their legal costs. Oregon’s share – $1,806,287 in fees and $445,088 in expenses, totaling $2,251,375 – reflects the significant resources the state invested in the litigation. The nine-state coalition’s combined request of approximately $10.3 million, if approved, will be paid by Kroger, not Oregon taxpayers.
This case illustrates what it looks like when states hold the line. As federal antitrust enforcement has retreated, state attorneys general have moved to fill that vacuum – defending consumers, protecting workers, and challenging corporate consolidation that Washington is no longer willing to confront. When states win those fights, the law allows them to shift the cost of litigation back to the corporations that forced it.
The proposed merger would have combined two of the largest grocery chains in the United States, eliminating competition in hundreds of communities across the country – including in Oregon. Economists and consumer advocates warned the deal would lead to higher prices at the checkout line, reduced wages for grocery workers, and fewer stores in communities that could least afford to lose them.
Oregon led today’s filing that included Arizona, California, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, and Wyoming.
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Oregon AG News & Media Releases
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Oregon DOJ.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Oregon AG News & Media Releases publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.