US District Court NDCA Docket Feed

Abdul Rahim Sabir II v. San Francisco County Sheriff's Office

Plaintiff Abdul Rahim Sabir II, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that unnamed persons at the San Francisco County Sheriff's Office violated his constitutional rights by stripping him naked in front of female staff and filming him without consent. The court conducted a preliminary screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found the complaint fails to state any claim for relief because it lacks sufficient factual information — including the date of the incident, the identities of the specific persons who committed the acts, and the context of the alleged conduct. The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended complaint on or before March 2, 2026, and failure to file by that date may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute.

Reyna v. 23andMe - TRO Denied; Genomic Data Breach Allegations Rejected

The US District Court for the Northern District of California denied a motion for temporary restraining order filed by pro se plaintiffs Joseph Anthony Reyna and C.R. against 23andMe, Inc. and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., stemming from plaintiffs' allegations that their private genomic data was exposed or at risk due to a data breach at 23andMe in October 2023. The Court denied the TRO for multiple independent reasons: plaintiffs failed to give notice to defendants, failed to demonstrate irreparable injury with no evidence their data would be sold or commercialized, and failed to show likelihood of success on the merits since plaintiffs expressly admitted they were not 23andMe customers. The Court also denied motions for a preservation order and for sealing guidance, both without prejudice.

Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. John Doe - Subpoena Order for IP Address Identification

The Northern District of California granted Strike 3 Holdings LLC's ex parte application for leave to serve a Rule 45 subpoena on AT&T Internet to identify a defendant whose IP address 99.121.63.154 was allegedly used for copyright infringement. The court found good cause under 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B) and related precedent, ordering the ISP to provide the defendant's true name and address and to notify the subscriber by certified mail with a copy of the order. Information disclosed may only be used for protecting and enforcing the plaintiff's rights in its complaint.