Tasman v. Jusakos - Florida District Court of Appeal Opinion
Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower tribunal's decision in the case of Tasman v. Jusakos. The opinion references a legal standard for individual actions versus derivative ones in corporate matters, citing prior case law. The case involves a dispute between two sets of individuals.
What changed
The Florida District Court of Appeal has affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in the case of Raci Tasman and Dean Tasman v. Luz M. Jusakos and Yani Jusakos. The court's disposition is 'Affirmed,' and the opinion cites Iezzi Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Edgewater Beach Owners Ass’n for the proposition that Florida law requires direct harm and special injury for a member to maintain an individual action over a derivative one.
This ruling signifies the final disposition of the appeal, upholding the previous judgment. For legal professionals involved in similar cases, this decision reinforces the established legal precedent regarding standing in corporate member actions. No new compliance obligations or deadlines are imposed by this appellate court decision; it pertains to the resolution of a specific legal dispute.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 20, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
RACI TASMAN, an Individual and DEAN TASMAN, an Individual, Husband and Wife v. LUZ M. JUSAKOS, an Individual and YANI JUSAKOS, an Individual, Husband and Wife
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 6D2024-1078
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2024-1078
Lower Tribunal No. 2015-CA-002393-O
RACI TASMAN and DEAN TASMAN,
Appellants,
v.
LUZ M. JUSAKOS and YANI JUSAKOS,
Appellees.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.
Lisa T. Munyon and Heather Pinder Rodriguez, Judges.
March 20, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Iezzi Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Edgewater Beach Owners Ass’n,
254 So. 3d 584, 586 n.2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (observing that “Florida requires a
direct harm and special injury to a corporation member, or a special duty owed, for
a member to maintain an individual action compared to a derivative one” (citing
Dinuro Invs., LLC v. Camacho, 141 So. 3d 731, 738-41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014))).
STARGEL, MIZE and PRATT, JJ., concur.
Alan B. Taylor, of Alan B. Taylor & Associates, Professional Association, Orlando,
for Appellants.
Stephen E. Belle, of Stephen E. Belle, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.