Mr W Boucher v Tanyard Youth Project Ltd: Employment Tribunal Judgment
Summary
Employment Tribunal in England and Wales issued a judgment by consent in the case of Mr W Boucher v Tanyard Youth Project Ltd (case 6004994/2025) on 23 January 2026. The decision addresses claims under contract of employment, unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, Working Time Regulations, and written statements. The full judgment is available via the UK Government publishing service.
What changed
The Employment Tribunal issued a judgment by consent in case 6004994/2025 between Mr W Boucher and Tanyard Youth Project Ltd. The case was decided under multiple employment law jurisdictions including contract of employment, unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, Working Time Regulations, and written statements.
Employers operating in England and Wales should note that this judgment covers standard employment claims that may arise in their organisations. The tribunal's findings on Working Time Regulations and written statement obligations are areas where compliance reviews may be warranted, particularly for organisations with youth project or charity sector employment practices.
Archived snapshot
Apr 21, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Mr W Boucher v Tanyard Youth Project Ltd: 6004994/2025
Employment Tribunal decision.
From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Employment Tribunal Published 21 April 2026 Country: England and Wales Jurisdiction code: Contract of Employment, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction from Wages, Working Time Regulations and Written Statements Decision date: 23 January 2026 Read the full decision in Mr W Boucher v Tanyard Youth Project Ltd: 6004994/2025 - Judgment by Consent.
Updates to this page
Published 21 April 2026
Related changes
Get daily alerts for UK HMCTS
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from HMCTS.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when UK HMCTS publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.