Harvey v. U.S. Nature-Invest Holdings - Appeal Dismissed as Untimely

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 21, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Reginald Charles Harvey v. U.S. Nature-Invest Holdings, LLC

Court of Appeals of Georgia

• Citations: None known
• Docket Number: A26A1540

• Disposition: Dismissed

• Opinion

• Authorities (1)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (0)

• PDF

Disposition

Dismissed

Combined Opinion

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________
April 21, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26A1540. REGINALD CHARLES HARVEY v. U.S. NATURE-INVEST
HOLDINGS, LLC.

In September 2024, plaintiff U.S. Nature-Invest Holdings, LLC filed a
complaint for declaratory relief and damages, alleging that Reginald Charles Harvey,
without cause, filed a “Preliminary Notice of Lien” and a “Full Deed of
Conveyance” against the plaintiff’s real property. In January 2025, the trial court
entered an order granting the plaintiff’s claim for declaratory relief, and reserving the
damages claims. Harvey filed a motion for reconsideration, which the trial court
denied on February 25, 2025.
On September 11, 2025, the trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss
without prejudice its remaining damages claims, and denied Harvey’s motion for
summary judgment. Harvey subsequently filed multiple motions, asking the trial court
to set aside the judgment, stay the proceedings, and compel arbitration. The trial court
denied the motions in November 2025. Thereafter, Harvey filed more motions making
the same requests, along with requests for the appointment of a special master, and
for summary judgment. On February 6, 2026, the trial court entered an order denying
all the motions. And on March 16, 2026, Harvey filed a notice of appeal. We, however,
lack jurisdiction.
Pretermitting whether Harvey is entitled to a direct appeal, his notice of appeal
was untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment
or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38(a). The proper and timely
filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this
Court. Ebeling v. State, 355 Ga. App. 469, 469 (844 SE2d 518) (2020). Because
Harvey’s notice of appeal was filed 38 days after entry of the trial court’s order, it is
untimely.1 Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
04/21/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1
In February 2026, Harvey also filed a request for a certificate of immediate
review of the February 25, 2025 order denying his motion for reconsideration, which
the trial court dismissed on March 2, 2026, because the time to seek review of the
order had expired. See OCGA § 5-6-34(b) (a certificate of immediate review must be
filed within ten days of the entry of the order). Although the notice of appeal is timely
as to this order, the denial or dismissal of a request for a certificate of immediate
review is not subject to a direct appeal. Price v. State, 237 Ga. 352, 352–53(2) (227
SE2d 368) (1976).