Estate of Jack Williams, Georgia Appeal Dismissed

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 17, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

In Re: Estate of Jack Williams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

• Citations: None known
• Docket Number: A26A0769

• Disposition: Dismissed

• Opinion

• Authorities (0)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (0)

• PDF

Disposition

Dismissed

Combined Opinion

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________
April 17, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26A0769. IN RE: ESTATE OF JACK WILLIAMS, DECEASED.

In this estate administration proceeding, the probate court issued a final order
on September 3, 2025, granting the estate representative’s petition for leave to sell
certain real property. On September 10, 2025, Crandall Postell, a great-grandchild of
the decedent, filed a timely pro se notice of appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-38(a). We lack
jurisdiction.
Postell was represented by attorney Daniel Wilder throughout the probate court
proceedings. And the record on appeal contains no indication that the probate court
issued an order permitting Wilder’s withdrawal.1 A layperson may not represent
himself and also be represented by an attorney. Romich v. All Secure, Inc., 361 Ga. App.
505, 505 (863 SE2d 179) (2021). And “a formal withdrawal of counsel cannot be
accomplished until after the trial court issues an order permitting the withdrawal.” Id.
(quotation marks omitted). Consequently, Postell’s pro se notice of appeal is a nullity,
as he was represented by counsel when he filed it. See Weinstock v. Small, 378 Ga.
App. 319, 320 (925 SE2d 760) (2026) (“[A] pro se notice of appeal filed by a
represented party in a civil case[ ] is a legal nullity and does not confer appellate
jurisdiction to this Court.”); Romich, 361 Ga. App. at 505 (dismissing appeal because
the appellant’s pro se notice of appeal, filed while she was represented by counsel, was

1
In his notice of appeal, Postell instructed the probate court clerk to “to submit
all documents extant in the record including all pleadings, discovery, motions, and
responses contained in the record of the Court.” No withdrawal order appears in
these filings.
a nullity); In the Interest of N. C., 358 Ga. App. 379, 379 (855 SE2d 379) (2021) (same).
We therefore lack jurisdiction to consider this pro se appeal, which is hereby
DISMISSED. See Weinstock, 378 Ga. App. at 320; Romich, 361 Ga. App. at 505; In the
Interest of N. C., 358 Ga. App. at 379.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
04/17/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.