Manzo v. Wohlstadter - Errata Sheet Amends Court Opinion
Summary
The First Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an errata sheet to amend a previously issued court opinion. The amendment corrects a minor typographical error on page 3 of the opinion dated March 24, 2026, by inserting the term "[sic]" after the word "contact".
What changed
An errata sheet has been issued by the First Circuit Court of Appeals to amend its opinion in the case of Manzo v. Wohlstadter, originally issued on March 24, 2026. The amendment is minor, specifically addressing a typographical error on page 3, line 26, by inserting "[sic]" after the word "contact". This correction does not alter the substantive findings or rulings of the original opinion.
Legal professionals and parties involved in this specific case should ensure they are referencing the amended opinion. This errata sheet serves to correct the official record and does not impose new compliance obligations or deadlines on external entities. The primary impact is on the accuracy of the case record itself.
Source document (simplified)
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 25-1304 MICHAEL A. MANZO; MICHAEL K. MANZO; LOUIS V. MANZO; PAUL A. AUWAERTER, M.D., Plaintiffs, Appellants,
SAMUEL WOHLSTADTER; NADINE WOHLSTADTER, Defendants, Appellees. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court issued on March 24, 2026, is amended as follows: On page 3, line 26, "[sic]" is inserted after "contact".
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when 1st Circuit Opinions publishes new changes.