Dru M. Guthrie Reprimanded for Rule Violations
Summary
The Idaho State Bar issued a Public Reprimand to attorney Dru M. Guthrie for violating rules of professional conduct, including knowingly disobeying a tribunal's order and failing to comply with discovery requests. The reprimand follows a stipulated resolution where Guthrie admitted to the violations.
What changed
The Professional Conduct Board of the Idaho State Bar issued a Public Reprimand to Idaho Falls attorney Dru M. Guthrie on December 2, 2025. The reprimand stems from violations of Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct (IRPC) 3.4(c) (knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), 3.4(d) (failing to make a reasonably diligent effort to comply with a legally proper discovery request), and 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice). Mr. Guthrie admitted to these violations in a stipulated resolution of a disciplinary proceeding.
The disciplinary action arose from Mr. Guthrie's handling of a client's uninsured motorist claim. Despite his client wishing to cease litigation and court orders requiring timely discovery responses, Mr. Guthrie failed to serve discovery and initial disclosures. This failure led to the dismissal of his client's case on the merits and an assessment of $420 in costs against the client, which Mr. Guthrie personally paid. The Public Reprimand does not limit his eligibility to practice law.
What to do next
- Review Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct 3.4(c), 3.4(d), and 8.4(d)
- Ensure timely compliance with all court orders and discovery obligations
- Confirm client intent to withdraw from litigation and formally dismiss cases as necessary
Penalties
Public Reprimand; $420 in costs assessed against client, paid personally by attorney.
Source document (simplified)
DRU M. GUTHRIE (Public Reprimand) On December 2, 2025, the Professional Conduct Board issued a Public Reprimand to Idaho Falls attorney Dru M. Guthrie based on violations of IRPC 3.4(c) [knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal], IRPC 3.4(d) [failing to make a reasonably diligent effort to comply with a legally proper discovery request], and IRPC 8.4(d) [engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice]. The Professional Conduct Board’s Disciplinary Order followed a stipulated resolution of an Idaho State Bar disciplinary proceeding in which Mr. Guthrie admitted that he violated those Rules. The formal charge case related to the following circumstances. Mr. Guthrie was retained by C.S., who was injured when she was struck by an uninsured motorist while crossing the street. C.S. timely submitted her uninsured motorist (“UM”) claim to her insurer. Mr. Guthrie filed C.S.’s civil Complaint against her insurer for failing to pay the UM claim. Thereafter, based on circumstances in her personal life, C.S. advised Mr. Guthrie that she no longer wished to pursue the civil litigation against her insurer. Mr. Guthrie did not dismiss the civil litigation or take any other steps to advise the Court or opposing counsel that C.S. was no longer pursuing the case. Despite two court orders, Mr. Guthrie failed to timely serve C.S.’s discovery responses and Initial Disclosures. The Court granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss C.S.’s case on the merits as a sanction for her failure to timely serve her discovery responses and Initial Disclosures and assessed $420 in costs against C.S., which Respondent personally paid. The Public Reprimand does not limit Mr. Guthrie’s eligibility to practice law. Inquiries about this matter may be directed to: Bar Counsel, Idaho State Bar, P.O. Box 895, Boise, Idaho 83701, (208) 334-4500.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ID State Bar Public Discipline publishes new changes.