Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Goldman Sachs Derivative Settlement Affirmed
Routine Enforcement Added Final

Goldman Sachs Derivative Settlement Affirmed

Favicon for courts.delaware.gov Delaware Court Opinions
Filed March 31st, 2026
Detected April 1st, 2026
Email

Summary

The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's approval of a third derivative settlement on behalf of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and the award of fees to Plaintiff Shiva Stein and Objector Sean J. Griffith. The affirmance relies on the February 27, 2024 Memorandum Opinion approving the Third Settlement and the August 11, 2025 Letter Opinion awarding fees. This concludes the shareholder derivative action C.A. No. 2017-0354.

What changed

The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's decisions from February 27, 2024 and August 11, 2025, which approved a third derivative settlement on behalf of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and awarded attorneys' fees to Plaintiff Stein and Objector Griffith. The Supreme Court found the lower court's rulings should be affirmed on the basis stated in those opinions. The case involved shareholder derivative claims against directors including Lloyd Blankfein, Michele Burns, and others.

No action is required from regulated entities. This appellate affirmance concludes the litigation in C.A. No. 2017-0354. The settlement approval and fee award are now final and binding on all parties. Companies should be aware that Delaware courts continue to scrutinize derivative settlement terms and fee requests in shareholder litigation.

Source document (simplified)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEAN J. GRIFFITH, § § No. 404, 2025 Objector-Below, § Appellant, § §

  1. § Court Below: Court of Chancery
    § of the State of Delaware SHIVA STEIN, derivatively on § behalf of The Goldman Sachs Group, § Inc., and individually as a § Stockholder of The Goldman Sachs § Group, Inc., § § C.A. No. 2017-0354 Plaintiff-Below, § Appellee, § § LLOYD C. BLANKFEIN, §

  2. MICHELE BURNS, §
    GARY D. COHN, MARK A. § FLAHERTY, WILLIAM W. § GEORGE, JAMES A. JOHNSON, § ELLEN J. KULLMAN, LAKSHMI §

  3. MITTAL, ADEBAYO O. §
    OGUNLESI, PETER § OPPENHEIMER, DEBORA L. § SPAR, MARK E. TUCKER, DAVID §

  4. VINIAR, MARK O. §
    WINKELMAN, and THE § GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., § § Defendants-Below, § Appellees § Submitted: March 25, 2026 Decided: March 31, 2026

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices. ORDER This 31st day of March, 2026, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in the February 27, 2024 Memorandum Opinion approving the Third Settlement, and the August 11, 2025 Letter Opinion awarding fees to Plaintiff Stein and Objector Griffith.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow

Justice

Named provisions

Third Settlement Derivative Settlement Approval

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Del. Sup. Ct.
Filed
March 31st, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
C.A. No. 2017-0354
Docket
C.A. No. 2017-0354

Who this affects

Applies to
Public companies Investors Legal professionals
Industry sector
5231 Securities & Investments
Activity scope
Derivative Litigation Shareholder Suits
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Securities
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Corporate Governance Banking

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Delaware Court Opinions publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.