Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal United States v. Cleveland Blackshear, III - Cr...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

United States v. Cleveland Blackshear, III - Criminal Appeal

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com 11th Circuit Published Opinions (CourtListener)
Filed March 26th, 2026
Detected March 26th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentence of Cleveland Blackshear, III. The court granted the appointed counsel's motion to withdraw, finding no arguable issues of merit upon independent review of the record.

What changed

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the convictions and sentence of Cleveland Blackshear, III, in case number 25-12250. The court granted the motion to withdraw filed by Blackshear's appointed counsel, citing the precedent set in Anders v. California, after an independent review of the record revealed no arguable issues of merit.

This decision means the appellant's convictions and sentence stand. For legal professionals involved in criminal appeals, this outcome underscores the importance of thorough record review and adherence to procedural requirements when seeking to withdraw representation due to a lack of meritorious issues. No further actions are required by regulated entities as this is a specific case outcome.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 26, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

United States v. Cleveland Blackshear, III

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Combined Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-12250 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2026 Page: 1 of 2

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit


No. 25-12250
Non-Argument Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

CLEVELAND BLACKSHEAR, III,
a.k.a. Cleve,
Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 4:24-cr-00003-MW-MAF-2


Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and KIDD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Sheryl J. Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Cleveland Black-
shear, III, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw
USCA11 Case: 25-12250 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2026 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-12250

from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursu-
ant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent exam-
ination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Blackshear’s
convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
11th Circuit
Filed
March 26th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
No. 25-12250
Docket
25-12250

Who this affects

Applies to
Criminal defendants
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Criminal Justice
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Judicial Administration

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when 11th Circuit Published Opinions (CourtListener) publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.