Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Joseph Michael Hirsch v. City of Dunwoody - App...
Priority review Enforcement Amended Final

Joseph Michael Hirsch v. City of Dunwoody - Appeal Dismissed

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com GA Court of Appeals Opinions
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed appeal A26A1386 filed by Joseph Michael Hirsch against the City of Dunwoody. The appellant failed to file an enumeration of errors and brief within the required 20 days after docketing, despite a court order dated March 17, 2026, granting until March 27, 2026, to cure the deficiency. The appeal was deemed abandoned and dismissed pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 7 and 23(a).

What changed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed appeal A26A1386 because the appellant failed to comply with the notice of docketing and Court of Appeals Rule 23(a), which requires filing an enumeration of errors and brief within 20 days after docketing. Although the court issued an order on March 17, 2026, giving the appellant until March 27, 2026, to file the required documents, the appellant still failed to comply. The appeal was deemed abandoned and dismissed under Court of Appeals Rules 7 and 23(a).

This decision underscores the strict enforcement of appellate procedural requirements by Georgia courts. Litigants filing appeals in Georgia must strictly adhere to docketing notices and deadlines for enumerations of errors and briefs; failure to do so results in automatic dismissal of the appeal regardless of the merits of the underlying case. Parties pursuing appellate review should implement robust docketing and filing procedures to avoid similar procedural default.

What to do next

  1. Monitor for updates if reconsideration or rehearing is sought
  2. Ensure compliance with all appellate procedural deadlines and docketing requirements

Archived snapshot

Apr 8, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 7, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

JOSEPH MICHAEL HIRSCH v. CITY OF DUNWOODY

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Disposition

Dismissed

Combined Opinion

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 07, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A26A1386. JOSEPH MICHAEL HIRSCH v. CITY OF DUNWOODY et al.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this
Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors
and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On March 17, 2026, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and
a brief no later than March 27, 2026. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of
errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is
hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 07, 2026.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes
of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto
affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Named provisions

Court of Appeals Rule 23(a) Court of Appeals Rule 7 Court of Appeals Rule 13

Get daily alerts for GA Court of Appeals Opinions

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from GA Ct. App..

What's AI-generated?

The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
GA Ct. App.
Filed
April 7th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Docket
A26A1386

Who this affects

Applies to
Criminal defendants Legal professionals Courts
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Appellate procedure compliance Brief and enumeration filing Docketing requirements
Geographic scope
US-GA US-GA

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Civil Rights Real Estate

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when GA Court of Appeals Opinions publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.