Tiffany Roseman v. Y2F Ventures, LLC - Appeal Dismissed
Summary
The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed appeal A26A1601 in Roseman v. Y2F Ventures, LLC for lack of jurisdiction. The court held that because the case involved a superior court's de novo review of a magistrate court ruling, appellant Tiffany Roseman was required to follow mandatory discretionary appeal procedures under OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1). Her failure to comply with these procedural requirements deprived the appellate court of jurisdiction to hear the case.
What changed
The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed Tiffany Roseman's appeal against Y2F Ventures, LLC (Case No. A26A1601) for lack of jurisdiction. The court found that Roseman failed to follow the mandatory discretionary appeal procedures required by OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1) when appealing a superior court decision that had reviewed a magistrate court ruling on a de novo basis. This procedural failure deprived the appellate court of jurisdiction to consider the appeal, resulting in automatic dismissal under established precedent (Greig v. Putnam County, 237 Ga. App. 57).\n\nFor practitioners and litigants in Georgia, this case reinforces the critical importance of complying with jurisdictional procedural requirements, particularly when appealing decisions involving magistrate court reviews. Parties who bypass required discretionary appeal procedures lose their right to appellate review entirely. The dismissal has no precedential value on substantive legal issues but serves as a cautionary example of how procedural missteps can end litigation regardless of the merits of the underlying claim.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates
Archived snapshot
Apr 8, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 7, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Tiffany Roseman v. Y2f Ventures, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: A26A1601
Disposition: Dismissed
Disposition
Dismissed
Combined Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
April 07, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A1601. TIFFANY ROSEMAN v. Y2F VENTURES, LLC.
This case originated in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, Tiffany
Roseman filed a petition for review in superior court. The superior court dismissed
the petition for review, and Roseman filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack
jurisdiction.
Because the underlying issue involves the superior court’s de novo review of
a magistrate court ruling, Roseman was required to follow the discretionary appeal
procedures in order to appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1); Greig v. Putnam County, 237 Ga.
App. 57, 57 (513 SE2d 294) (1999). Roseman’s failure to comply with the requisite
procedures deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby
DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
04/07/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for GA Court of Appeals Opinions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from GA Court of Appeals.
The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when GA Court of Appeals Opinions publishes new changes.