AG Demands Answers on SNAP Funding Lapse
Summary
New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, joined by 23 other attorneys general, has demanded answers from the USDA regarding potential lapses in SNAP funding due to the federal government shutdown. The letter expresses grave concern over the potential harm to millions of Americans, including children, seniors, and veterans, who rely on these benefits.
What changed
Attorney General Raúl Torrez, leading a coalition of 23 state attorneys general, has sent a letter to the Secretary of the USDA demanding clarity on how the department will proceed following an alert that SNAP funding may lapse due to the ongoing federal government shutdown. The letter highlights that approximately 450,000 New Mexicans rely on SNAP benefits and criticizes the USDA's directive to states to hold November issuance files without citing legal authority or providing reasoning, especially given the existence of billions in contingency reserve funds and Section 32 funds that could be utilized.
The attorneys general are requesting specific answers from the USDA by October 27, 2025, concerning the availability and intended use of contingency and other available funds to continue SNAP benefits. The action underscores the potential for severe hardship for 42 million Americans and significant economic disruption if benefits are delayed or suspended. Regulated entities, primarily state agencies administering SNAP, are being directed by the USDA to hold benefit issuance files, creating immediate operational uncertainty.
What to do next
- Monitor USDA response to the AGs' letter by October 27, 2025.
- Prepare for potential disruptions in SNAP benefit distribution.
- Advocate for the use of contingency funds to ensure benefit continuity.
Source document (simplified)
View All Press Releases
Attorney General Raúl Torrez Demands Answers from Trump Administration on SNAP Funding Due to Lapse at End of Month
- October 24, 2025
Albuquerque, N.M. – Attorney General Ra úl Torrez, alongside a coalition of 23 attorneys general, sent a letter today to the secretary of the USDA Brooke Rollins demanding clarity and additional information on how the USDA plans to proceed after alerting states that funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) may lapse in the near future because of the ongoing federal government shutdown. The letter also detailed the grave harm that will be caused to children, seniors and veterans who rely on food assistance for their daily meals.
Nearly 40 percent of SNAP recipients nationwide in FY 2023 were children ages 0-17, and adults ages 60 and older made up another 20 percent.
“Approximately 450,000 New Mexicans rely on these SNAP benefits to feed their families,” said Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “Congress has already appropriated these funds, and several states have contingency funding in place to fill gaps caused by unforeseen interruptions. It is irresponsible to direct states to withhold this contingency funding, a decision which, if upheld, will devastate and cause irreparable harm to families. My office will do everything in its power to ensure these funds continue to be distributed and keep meals on the table for New Mexicans.”
On October 10, 2025, the USDA issued a letter to all state agencies and state agency directors that administer the SNAP program indicating that “if the current lapse in appropriations continues, there will be insufficient funds to pay full November SNAP benefits for approximately 42 million individuals across the Nation.” It also “direct[ed] States to hold their November issuance files and delay transmission to State EBT vendors until further notice,” including “on-going SNAP benefits and daily files.”
This letter indicated, without citing any legal authority, or providing any reasoning, the USDA is prohibiting states from sending already-calculated November allotments to EBT vendors for processing.
The USDA appears to have at least $6 billion in SNAP contingency reserve funds that Congress appropriated for emergency situations like this. The attorneys general argue the federal government should use those funds to continue providing SNAP benefits rather than direct states to suspend already-calculated allotments. Furthermore, the USDA also has access to Section 32 funds that could also be used to provide SNAP benefits during the ongoing shutdown.
While the USDA does have some authority to reduce SNAP benefits, or even suspend or cancel them under certain circumstances, the USDA’s October 10 letter does not indicate that any of the legal requirements to do so have been met.
The attorneys general argue that, if carried out, this directive could cause significant hardship for the 42 million Americans who depend on SNAP to feed themselves and their families. Even a temporary delay will have devastating effects on the American public and the national economy.
The letter sent by the attorneys general asks the USDA to answer the following critical questions by October 27, 2025:
- Does USDA/FNS have contingency funds left over from prior Congressional appropriations? If so, what is the total of those contingency funds?
- Does USDA/FNS have access to any other sources of available funds to pay benefits and administrative costs associated with issuing those benefits?
- Does USDA/FNS intend to use such funds to furnish SNAP benefits, even at a reduced level? If not, why not? And if so, how does the agency intend to execute that plan, and when would States be expected to send their benefit issuance files?
- Assuming USDA/FNS has contingency funds, on what grounds did the agency direct States to “hold” November files, rather than reducing allotments consistent with available funds?
- Should States treat the October 10 letter as a “suspension” of benefits or a “cancellation” of benefits under 7 C.F.R. § 271.7, or neither? AG Letter to USDA re SNAP Benefits Lapse
New Mexico joined in sending this letter with the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia.
Most Viewed
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when AG: New Mexico Press Releases publishes new changes.